Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Oakhill secure training centre

Inspected 1 Dec 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Team Leader

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    1 Dec 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Team Leader

  • Postcode verified

    MK5 6AJ

  • Name on report verified

    Oakhill secure training centre

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisesecure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings15w+20
  • What needs to improve16w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
31
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
10 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 1%What needs to improve 1%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

Oakhill secure training centre

Chalgrove Field Oakhill Milton Keynes MK5 6AJ

p.1

Monitoring visit

Inspected under the secure training centres inspection framework

p.1

Information about this secure training centre

Oakhill secure training centre is operated by G4S Care and Justice Services. The centre provides accommodation for up to 80 children aged 12 to 17 years who are serving a custodial sentence or who are remanded to custody by the courts. There were 34 children resident at the time of this monitoring visit.

p.1

Information about this secure training centre

Education and healthcare are provided on site in separate dedicated services. Both services are delivered by G4S .

p.1

Information about this secure training centre

Inspection dates: 30 November to 1 December 2021

p.1

This monitoring visit

As a result of the serious and widespread failures found at the full inspection of 4 to 8 October 2021, the joint inspectorates invoked the urgent notification process. This process is set out in the joint inspection framework for secure training centres.

p.1

This monitoring visit

This monitoring visit was unannounced. The purpose of the visit was to ensure that children are safe and that adequate steps have been taken by G4S to safeguard and protect the welfare of children.

p.1

This monitoring visit

A safeguarding working group has been established by the centre to address the outstanding and delayed referrals to local authority children’s services seen at the last inspection. The group is made up of staff from across the centre, including from education and health. Over 230 cases have been subject to reassessment and review, and where necessary referred to external agencies for further action and/or investigation. The cases reviewed to date have highlighted a number of concerns, although these do not relate to the risk of significant harm to children. The quality of safeguarding outcome records is improving. The head of safeguarding identifies areas of learning and development. However, there remains some delay in the completion of staff practice supervision where this is a required outcome of a safeguarding concern.

p.1

This monitoring visit

Improvement in quality assurance processes means that the head of safeguarding highlights any gaps in practice. She tracks any patterns and trends. This is very new and in the developmental stage, with bespoke ‘You Count’ action plans for staff to support improved practice and to better protect children.

p.2

This monitoring visit

Partnership working with external agencies has been re-established. External quality assurance and benchmarking systems ensure that safeguarding matters are now referred to the relevant agencies within appropriate timescales.

p.2

This monitoring visit

Senior leaders have committed to increasing the size of the safeguarding team to include appropriately qualified and experienced staff. If progressed, this development plan has the potential to ensure that the safeguarding service responds effectively to all safeguarding matters.

p.2

This monitoring visit

The interim director has focused on eliminating the inconsistencies that undermined behaviour management at the previous inspection. Many staff spoke about managers being more visible and being supported when they were faced with poor behaviour by children. Focus groups regarding behaviour management and Minimising and Managing Physical Restraint (MMPR) are appreciated by staff and have led to an increase in staff confidence.

p.2

This monitoring visit

Oversight of the incentives scheme has improved. There is a new focus on being ‘open and honest’ when communicating with children about their behaviour and incentives levels. Inspectors found that most children could only access the incentives they were entitled to.

p.2

This monitoring visit

While there was a reduction in incidents of violence in November, levels over the previous six months remained high when taking into account the reduced population of the centre. Previous delays in incidents being reviewed at the weekly restraint minimisation meeting have been addressed. However, records of this meeting were poor. This hinders the ability of managers to track actions.

p.2

This monitoring visit

In recent months, the use of force has reduced from the very high levels seen in the summer. CCTV footage of incidents is reviewed by a duty manager within 24 hours and quality-assured by an MMPR coordinator. Some restraints reviewed by inspectors could have been avoided. There are examples of poor communication and staff not turning on their body-worn cameras. Most of these issues have been identified by the MMPR coordinators. There is a small backlog of five incidents awaiting quality assurance. Safeguarding referrals relating to the use of force are now made promptly when required.

p.2

This monitoring visit

The responses to children’s, professionals’ and parents’ complaints have improved. Since the last inspection, consultation with children has taken place and an analysis of complaint responses has been made. 70% of children engaged in the consultation. Children said that they feel confident that they will be listened to. Inspectors found that matters in several discrimination incident reporting forms had not been addressed. Inspectors were assured that these matters would be investigated as a matter of urgency.

p.2

This monitoring visit

The dining room has been closed since the beginning of the first national lockdown in March 2020. Plans to reopen it have not been achieved and have been delayed further due to recent positive COVID-19 test results for children and staff. Food continues to be delivered to children’s living units in polystyrene boxes. Staff do not encourage and role- model the use of plates and cutlery and some children continue to eat from polystyrene boxes with their fingers. These eating arrangements do not treat children with dignity and respect and senior leaders have given assurance that this will be addressed.

p.3

This monitoring visit

The children’s living environment has notably improved, and a programme of refurbishment has started. Although the house units are much cleaner, staff have not always ensured that all living areas are kept to a good standard. Some kitchens had ingrained dirt on cabinets and inside cookers.

p.3

This monitoring visit

Residential staff are now able to access key information that informs them about the day- to-day care needs of the children. The information is up to date and relevant in identifying any risks to children. Staff understand this information, which enables them to help keep children safe. One child said to inspectors that ‘Staff are not here for the money; they are here because they actually care about us.’

p.3

This monitoring visit

Since the last inspection, there has been another change of interim director. The new interim director started work on 8 November 2021. He has made a palpable difference in a very short period. He is child-focused and clear in his priorities to improve and sustain the standard of care and safety for children at the centre. The interim director and his senior leadership team are visible and known across the centre to children and staff.

p.3

This monitoring visit

Staff feel better supported through regular supervision that is now taking place. There is an investment and understanding by staff of the centre’s newly and clearly defined priorities for improvement. Staff are given clear and consistent messages by leaders. They spoke to inspectors with energy and enthusiasm about being refocused and repurposed.

p.3

This monitoring visit

The immediate serious and widespread concerns identified in the key recommendations from the last inspection have been addressed, meaning children are safer. However, it is very early days, and the changes have not yet been embedded. It was very apparent to inspectors that the reduction in population has enabled staff to engage more meaningfully with children, and to use the spaces available for positive activities and engagement with children. The lower numbers mean that living units were seen to be far less cramped.

p.3

This monitoring visit

The centre is about to experience further change with the imminent appointment of a permanent director. While this is positive, fragility remains in the existing leadership team and staff workforce and the very recent impetus and improvement requires extensive consolidation to provide a good level of safe care to children.

p.3

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

4–8 October 2021 Inspection Inadequate 13 September 2021 Monitoring visit Not applicable 24 May 2021 Monitoring visit Not applicable

p.4

Recommendation

◼ ensure that the recommendations from the October 2021 inspection are fully addressed, embedded and sustained.

p.4

Information about this inspection

The purpose of this visit was to monitor the action taken and the progress made by the secure training centre since its last inspection.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The centre was inspected under the secure training centres inspection framework.

p.5

Information about this inspection

This inspection was carried out in accordance with Rule 43 of the Secure Training Centre Rules (produced in compliance with Section 47 of the Prison Act 1952, as amended by Section 6(2) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994), Section 80 of the Children Act 1989. Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector’s power to inspect secure training centres is provided by section 146 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006.

p.5

Information about this inspection

Joint inspections involving Ofsted, Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) and the Care Quality Commission (CQC) are permitted under paragraph 7 of Schedule 13 to the Education and Inspections Act 2006. This enables Ofsted’s Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector to act jointly with other public authorities for the efficient and effective exercise of her functions.

p.5

Information about this inspection

All inspections carried out by Ofsted, HMIP and CQC contribute to the UK’s response to its international obligations under the UN Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture (OPCAT) and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. OPCAT requires that all places of detention are visited regularly by independent bodies – known as the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) – which monitor the treatment of and conditions for detainees.

p.5

Inspectors

Pauline Higham, Senior Her Majesty’s Inspector, Lead Inspector, Ofsted Shaun Common, Senior Officer Secure Estate, Quality Assurance Manager, Ofsted Jo Stephenson, Regulatory Inspection Manager, Ofsted Elaine Allison, Regulatory Inspection Manager, Ofsted Gary Turney, Inspector, Care Quality Commission Angus Jones, Team Leader, Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion