Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

Miss Emily's

Inspected 24 Nov 2021 · published 30 Dec 2021 · URN EY554449

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Karen Cox

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Walmsley, Ann Jeanette

  • Group reference verified

    RP513661

  • Inspection date verified

    24 Nov 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Karen Cox

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    PR5 5SZ

  • Name on report verified

    Miss Emily's

  • URN verified

    EY554449

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−4Mixedmore positive than 84% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositivemake good progresseffectivelyhappyenjoyeffectivesafecaring
Criticismnot effectiveunsafecompromisedfailfailureconcernconcernsnot consistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings797w−2
  • Safeguarding272w−8

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,037
about usual (typical 972)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 51
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
5
typical 1
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%Safeguarding 17%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of Miss Emily's 1-5 Emily Street, Lostock Hall, Preston, Lancashire PR5 5SZ

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Children's safety is compromised. This is because staff do not make sure that emergency medication that children may require is readily available, should they need to administer it. In addition, staff do not make sure some of the resources in the outdoor area are in good repair and safe for children to use.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Not all children's needs are met effectively. Babies are not able to access the outdoor area daily, which impacts on their overall health and well-being. While pre- school children are settled and explore with increasing confidence, children in the toddler room do not enjoy the same quality of experiences. This is because staff do not effectively engage with children as they play or have a detailed understanding of their individual learning needs and next steps. Furthermore, changes to nominated key staff mean that not all children's individual learning needs are known and planned for accordingly. Children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and children who speak English as an additional language, are not given the precise support they need to help them to make good progress.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Staff show kindness, concern and a caring nature towards the children, who in turn demonstrate that they feel happy and secure. Staff recognise the impact that COVID-19 has had on children. As a result, they have supported children to develop their skills in sharing, turn taking and being confident in social situations. Staff promote positive behaviour. They remind children of the nursery's expectations. Children are able to follow simple instructions and behave well. Overall, children have a positive attitude to learning and enjoy exploring the activities and resources that staff provide. For example, pre-school children enjoy learning about numbers. They calculate how many blocks they will need to match the number on the cards they have chosen.

p.2

need to do better?

n Staff do not ensure that children's medication is available to administer, should an emergency situation arise. For example, children who require an inhaler are able to attend without their medication on site and readily available. This compromises children's safety and well-being. n Although there are risk assessment procedures in place, these are not comprehensive. For example, staff fail to identify and remove items outside that have become unsafe for children to use, due to wear and tear. However, risk assessments in the indoor areas are implemented effectively. n Not all babies have daily access to outdoor play. This is because staff take the decision to keep all children indoors to meet the needs of children who have additional health care concerns. This has an impact on those children who prefer to learn outdoors, as staff are not able to provide babies with important outdoor

p.2

need to do better?

24 November 2021 learning experiences to fully promote their overall good health and physical development. n Staff do not consistently interact with children, particularly those with SEND, to support their learning. For example, staff sit behind children and do not engage in conversations, model language or make eye contact. This approach does not help children to develop their communication, language and social skills. Furthermore, staff do not obtain precise information about children with SEND to help to close gaps in their learning and prevent them from falling further behind. n Changes to children's key persons are not implemented swiftly enough to ensure all children have a named person who knows them well. Consequently, staff do not always have a precise understanding of how to meet children's individual needs to support their learning and development. Additionally, some parents are not aware of who their child's key person is to ensure effective lines of

p.2

need to do better?

communication. n Procedures to manage staff performance are not effective. Staff do not benefit from regular and purposeful supervision in order to develop their knowledge and skills. This prevents staff from making the necessary improvements to the quality of their teaching and interactions with children. n Staff working with pre-school children help them to become skilful communicators. They ask children thought-provoking questions and encourage children to talk about what they are doing. Staff use descriptive language and repetition to ensure that children are able to hear a wide range of vocabulary. However, despite babies and toddlers being happy and engaged in activities, staff do not recognise the potential impact that the consistent use of dummies has on children's communication development. n The very recently appointed manager has a clear vision for improvement. She demonstrates passion and commitment to bring about rapid and positive

p.3

need to do better?

changes. She has enthusiastically already implemented changes to the environment, which have had a positive impact on children's engagement levels and their eagerness to learn.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Inconsistencies in risk assessment, and a failure to ensure that children have the medication that they need, compromises children's safety and has a significant impact on the ability of leaders and staff to safeguard children. Staff demonstrate a suitable understanding of safeguarding issues. They attend training to enable them to identify the possible signs and symptoms that may indicate a child is suffering from abuse or neglect. There is a whistle-blowing policy in place which is known and understood by staff. All staff undergo suitability checks as part of their recruitment process. This helps to ensure that they are safe to work with children.

p.3

Due date

ensure that all medication that children require is available and easily accessible in the event of an emergency situation 03/12/2021

p.4

Due date

improve systems for risk assessment, in particular the outdoor area, to ensure that any potential hazards are identified and quickly removed to minimise risks to children 03/12/2021

p.4

Due date

ensure that children with SEND, and those who speak English as an additional language, are supported swiftly and appropriately to meet their individual requirements and help them to make good progress 03/12/2021

p.4

Due date

review the existing key-person arrangements to ensure that all children have a named key person to support their individual needs and progress 03/12/2021

p.4

Due date

ensure that outdoor activities are planned and taken by all children on a daily basis in order to support their health, well-being and physical development 03/12/2021

p.4

Due date

implement effective systems for supervision, coaching and professional development of staff to improve the quality of teaching and learning 03/12/2021

p.4

Due date

ensure staff understand how to successfully support children's communication and language development. 03/12/2021

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number EY554449 Local authority Lancashire Inspection number 10214717 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises Registers Early Years Register Day care type Full day care

p.5

inspection

Total number of places 31 Number of children on roll 33 Name of registered person Walmsley, Ann Jeanette

p.5

reference number

Telephone number 07791412770 Date of previous inspection 4 October 2019

p.5

Information about this early years setting

Miss Emily's registered in 2017. The nursery employs eight members of staff. Of these, the manager holds a qualification at level 6 and six staff hold qualifications at level 3 or above. The nursery operates Monday to Friday from 7.30am to 6pm, all year round. The nursery provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.

p.5

Inspection activities

n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The inspector spoke with parents, staff and children at appropriate times throughout the inspection. n A learning walk was completed with the manager to discuss the curriculum intent and how the provision is organised. n The inspector completed a joint evaluation of an activity with the learning and development manager. n The inspector held a meeting with the manager, learning and development manager and the provider. She reviewed a variety of documents, including evidence of the suitability of staff, qualifications, first-aid certificates and policies. n The inspector observed interactions between staff and children during activities and assessed the impact of teaching on children's learning.

p.6

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Inspection activities

24 November 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion