Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
16 Dec 2020
- URN verified
EY373876
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 1
- Words of findings
- 313
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills is leading Ofsted's work into how regulated early years and childcare providers in England have delivered child- centred practice and care, within the context of the restrictions placed on society during the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic.
p.1
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right. On 27 August 2020, we received concerns that this provider was not meeting some of these requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
As a result of the safeguarding concerns we received, we suspended the provider's registration because we believed children may be at risk of harm. Suspension allows time for the provider to take steps to reduce or eliminate the risk of harm to children. The provider has appealed twice to the Health, Education and Social Care First-tier Tribunal to have his suspension lifted. They have heard both appeals and the suspension remains in place. The provider may not provide childcare for which registration is required while the suspension is in place and may commit an offence if they do so.
p.1
Summary of outcome
Following our investigation into the concerns we took steps to cancel the provider's registration. The provider appealed to an independent external tribunal, the Health, Education and Social Care First-tier Tribunal, and it did not uphold the appeal. The provider's registration is therefore cancelled and they are no longer registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion