Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Oakwood High School

Inspected 10 Nov 2021 · published 15 Dec 2021 · URN 140459

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

James Duncan (lead), Katherine Spurr

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Nov 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    James Duncan, Katherine Spurr

  • Postcode verified

    S60 2UH

  • Name on report verified

    Oakwood High School

  • URN verified

    140459

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+6Mostly positivemore positive than 10% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveenjoyhigh expectationsoutstandingwell ledfeel safeeffectivelyconsistently
Criticismconcernsinconsistenciespoorseriousnot alwaysseriouslynot well plannedstruggles

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1353w+4
  • Safeguarding86w+17

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,435
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 55
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Safeguarding 4%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Oakwood High School Moorgate Road, Rotherham, South Yorkshire S60 2UH

p.1

Inspection dates: 9 and 10 November 2021

p.1

Outcome

Oakwood High School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy attending Oakwood High School. They feel safe and enjoy their lessons. They have access to a broad range of subjects regardless of their background, ability or any individual needs. Leaders recognise the potential of every pupil and ensure that any barriers to learning are addressed.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils have access to many extra-curricular activities. These include local, national and international trips. After-school clubs add to pupils’ academic, creative and sporting experiences. Visitors are invited into the school to help enrich pupils’ learning. High- quality support is provided to pupils in preparing them for life after school. Older pupils benefit from a structured work experience programme.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils respect each other. They respect the diversity of the pupil population. They know that teachers and other staff will support them if they have concerns. Pupils and parents and carers consider incidents of bullying to be rare. However, when problems do arise, they have confidence that these will be addressed quickly.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Staff have high expectations of all pupils. Most pupils behave well in and out of lessons. If a pupil struggles to self-regulate their behaviour, leaders provide them with personalised support. This is one part of leaders’ effective ‘care, prepare and repair’ pastoral programme.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders have designed a challenging and exciting curriculum that considers pupils’ aspirations and interests. In key stage 3, pupils study all subjects in the national curriculum. Younger pupils who need additional support with reading or mathematics get the help they need. Parents and pupils all praise the transition arrangements in place before pupils join in Year 7. 9 and 10 November 2021

p.1

2

In key stage 4, leaders offer subjects closely linked to local careers, such as those in engineering and health and social care. Leaders have high ambitions for all pupils. Some pupils, for example, study more than one modern foreign language in key stage 4. All pupils are given the opportunity to study triple science.

p.2

2

Senior leaders undertake regular checks on pupils’ learning. They have used this information to evaluate each subject. Their own evaluations are accurate. As such, they have been able to target support to certain subjects. In mathematics, for example, the subject leader has been supported to improve the curriculum. Teachers have been provided with coaching. This support is helping. Pupils speak highly of their lessons in mathematics and can remember more of what they have been taught.

p.2

2

Although all subject leaders’ plans are well thought through, there remain some inconsistencies in the implementation of these in lessons. Leaders are already aware of this. They have identified subjects that need support to improve, including science, geography and history. Leaders are now turning their attention to these subjects. Addressing this will help ensure that pupils are able to recall more of what they have been taught.

p.2

2

Pupils who require additional support receive it quickly and effectively. Pupils who speak English as an additional language receive help from specialists. The needs of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are well known and understood. Teachers use this information to create ‘class profile’ documents that set out precisely how they are meeting the needs of all pupils. Although pupils who require additional help to read receive appropriate support, the wider culture of reading is less well established. Many pupils do not read often or widely. The lessons that younger pupils currently have in the school library are not well planned and are not helping to broaden their vocabulary.

p.2

2

Pupils behave well, especially in lessons. The number of exclusions is low. When incidents of poor behaviour do occur, leaders provide effective support for pupils. As a result, many pupils do not make the same mistakes again. Pupils understand why sanctions such as detentions are used, and say that these are used consistently. Some pupils are livelier out of their lessons, for example at lunchtime. However, leaders provide effective supervision. Pupils benefit from leaders’ efforts to provide a calm, purposeful learning environment.

p.2

2

The school’s personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) provision supports pupils with their wider development. In addition to a weekly timetabled PSHE lesson for every pupil, leaders enrich learning in other ways. For example, Year 7 pupils are challenged to widen their own cultural experiences though ‘passports for learning’. Pupils in Year 10 take part in a work experience programme. All pupils have access to a broad extra-curricular offer.

p.2

2

The school is well led. Leaders value the opinions of staff and are mindful of their workload and well-being. Inspectors could clearly see why 98 per cent of staff who responded to the inspection staff survey said that they were proud to work at Oakwood. The responses to Ofsted’s parent questionnaire showed that the vast majority of parents would also recommend the school. 9 and 10 November 2021

p.2

3

There have been several recent changes to the local governing body. A new chair has recently been appointed. Training has been provided to support the chair in this role. All statutory responsibilities are met. However, governors are less well informed about the curriculum. They have not received training in this area. Governors do not always effectively challenge leaders’ decisions and opinions.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders take safeguarding seriously. They make appropriate checks on new members of staff to ensure that they are safe to work with pupils.

p.3

Safeguarding

Systems to keep pupils safe are in place and embedded. Pupils who require help are identified quickly. Support is arranged, including with external agencies where appropriate. Record-keeping is detailed and secure. Pupils know where to go for help and speak highly of the pastoral care they receive. They know the risks they face locally, nationally and online.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 There are inconsistencies in the implementation of the school’s curriculum. Pupils’ experiences in subjects vary. In subjects including English, mathematics and graphics, there is clear evidence of the work leaders have done to improve the way in which subject plans are planned and delivered. Leaders should ensure that these strategies are now deployed in other subjects, including science, geography and history.  Governors have provided leaders with support throughout the pandemic to help the school run well. However, their focus on the school’s curriculum has been diluted, and therefore they have not been able to support and challenge leaders as well as they could. Ensuring that governors are more aware of the school’s curriculum is important for the school to make further improvements to its quality of education.  The work leaders are doing to create a culture of reading is not fully developed. Pupils

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

are not exposed to books or other texts as often as they could be. Some pupils read rarely. This is not supporting leaders’ work to broaden pupils’ vocabulary. Leaders should ensure that improving the reading culture in the school is addressed.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good or outstanding school, because it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within 9 and 10 November 2021

p.3

4

one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the section 8 inspection a section 5 inspection immediately.

p.4

4

This is the second section 8 inspection since we judged the predecessor school, Oakwood High School, to be good in December 2012.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 9 and 10 November 2021

p.4

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,039

p.5

Date of previous inspection

27 September 2016, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school uses one alternative provision: The Chislett Centre.

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of the Inspire Multi-Academy Trust.

p.5

Information about this inspection

This was the first routine inspection the school had received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders, and have taken that into account in their evaluation.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors met with the headteacher, the senior leadership team, the special educational needs coordinator and several members of teaching and non-teaching staff. The lead inspector also met with the chief executive officer of the trust, in addition to representatives from the local governing body.  To evaluate the quality of education, inspectors carried out deep dives in English, mathematics and computer science. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject 9 and 10 November 2021

p.5

6

leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also spoke to other subject leaders and reviewed their curriculum plans. Additional lesson visits were conducted across all subjects. The inspection team reviewed the PSHE curriculum and other strategies used to support pupils’ wider personal development.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour around the school site and in lessons. Inspectors spoke to several members of staff to understand their views about the conduct of pupils. The team also spoke to pupils, formally and informally, to discuss their perceptions of behaviour. Behaviour and attendance records were reviewed.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors met the school’s designated safeguarding lead, child protection officer and human resources manager. The school’s

p.6

6

safeguarding policies and procedures and other records were reviewed. The checks that the school makes when appointing new staff were checked.  The inspection team considered the views of 88 members of staff and 248 pupils who responded to Ofsted’s surveys. Inspectors also took into account the 48 responses to Ofsted’s survey, Parent View.

p.6

Inspection team

James Duncan, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Katherine Spurr Her Majesty’s Inspector 9 and 10 November 2021

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion