Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 11 Nov 2021 · published 15 Dec 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Eleanor Belfield

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    11 Nov 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Eleanor Belfield

  • Postcode verified

    SR4 8PG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+62Positivemore positive than 87% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisehigh-qualitypositivestrongambitiouseffectivelyimprovedconfidentlove
Criticismrequires improvementconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings727w+71
  • Leadership121w+56
  • What needs to improve148w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
993
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
5
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 73%Leadership 12%What needs to improve 15%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Nicola White Principal Christ’s College Pennywell Road Sunderland Tyne and Wear SR4 8PG

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Christ’s College

Following my visit to your school on 11 November 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Christ’s College

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Christ’s College

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. I discussed the ongoing impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Christ’s College

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action in

order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action in

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action in

 ensure that governors have a strong understanding of the curriculum and its impact on pupils’ learning, so that they can support and challenge leaders effectively.

p.1

Context

Since joining the school in September 2020, you have made a number of changes to the leadership structure, supported by the Emmanuel Schools Foundation. There have been several key appointments to the school, including a leader for phonics, a special educational needs and disabilities coordinator (SENDCo) and a new lead for early years. Fourteen teachers joined the school in September 2021. You currently have a vacancy for a primary headteacher. A new chair of governors recently took up post.

p.2

Main findings

You and other leaders are taking the right actions to improve the school. As a result, all areas identified in the last inspection have improved. Staff feel supported by you and your leadership team. They know that you are mindful of workload, and that you will listen to their concerns. There is a real sense of staff working together to bring about sustained change.

p.2

Main findings

The responses received to the Ofsted’ Parent View survey show that parents are increasingly positive about the school. Pupils agree. They said that the teachers are friendly and help them learn. There is little bullying and if it occurs, pupils are confident that staff will sort it out.

p.2

Main findings

You and senior leaders from the trust have focused on developing middle leadership. Subject leaders have received training and support to develop high-quality and ambitious curriculum plans. Primary and secondary subject leads have worked together to develop clear plans from early years to key stage 4. These plans now set out the important knowledge that leaders want pupils to know and remember over time. Topics are carefully sequenced to build on what pupils already know.

p.2

Main findings

A positive reading culture is developing across the school. The refurbished libraries are vibrant and inviting spaces. Pupils can choose from a range of high-quality books. Pupils of all ages take part in different schemes to encourage them to develop a love of reading. In the primary phase, staff are skilled at teaching phonics. Books for practising reading are now carefully matched to the sounds children know. The leader for phonics carefully monitors the progress pupils make. Those who are struggling to read are supported to catch up quickly. Some pupils in key stage 3 are not fluent readers. You recognise that some would benefit from support with their phonics.

p.2

Main findings

You appointed an experienced SENDCo, who took up post in September 2021. She has keen oversight of all pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). There is now careful analysis of their attendance, attainment and progress. This helps inform interventions to ensure that every pupil is supported to meet their potential. The SENDCo has worked rapidly to improve the support plans for many pupils with SEND. Plans now include the views of pupils and parents. Teaching staff have been trained to review and update support plans. Staff said that this has helped them get to know pupils better and provide the right support. Some plans still need to be reviewed. This is a priority for leaders.

p.2

Main findings

You value the support you have received from the trust around curriculum development. Teachers benefit from working with staff from other trust schools. Teachers said that subject networks allow them to share practice, such as on the use of assessment.

p.3

Main findings

Governors are provided with rich information and analysis regarding the school’s performance. However, governors do not hold leaders to account sufficiently well for all aspects of the school’s work. They do not routinely challenge school leaders on areas such as improving the curriculum.

p.3

Additional support

You value the support that you receive from a headteacher from the trust executive leadership team, who has been commissioned to be your school improvement lead. This has helped you to prioritise the areas for further development and take decisions to improve the curriculum.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you, other senior leaders and curriculum leaders for English, mathematics and science. I also met with the phonics leader and the SENDCo. I spoke with a group of staff and a group of pupils. I met the chair and two other members of the school improvement board, as well as the trust’s chief executive officer and school improvement lead, to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

I visited a range of lessons and looked at pupils’ workbooks in maths and history. I reviewed minutes of the school improvement board meetings and looked at other policies and documents. I considered the 66 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Emmanuel Schools Foundation multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Sunderland. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion