Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

HMP Elmley

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Saul Pope

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Saul Pope

  • Postcode verified

    ME12 4DZ

  • Name on report verified

    HMP Elmley

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisesecure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings18w0
  • What needs to improve288w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
306
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 1%What needs to improve 24%About the inspection 75%

Full report text

HMP Elmley Prison education standalone progress monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Saul Pope, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Address:

Church Road Eastchurch Sheerness Kent ME12 4DZ Progress monitoring visit: HMP Elmley, 22 and 23 June 2021

p.1

Ofsted context and focus of visit

On 17 March 2020, all Ofsted routine inspections were suspended due to the COVID- 19 pandemic. As part of our phased return to routine inspections of education, skills and work activities in prisons and Young Offender Institutions (YOIs), Ofsted is carrying out progress monitoring visits. The visit was conducted by Ofsted alone without HMI Prisons. The visit was conducted on site. At the time of the visit, the establishment was at stage 3 of Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Services’ (HMPPS) recovery roadmap and had been at that stage for six weeks.

p.2

Ofsted context and focus of visit

Progress monitoring visits aim to inform prisoners, employers and government on how establishments are meeting the education and skills needs of all prisoners during this period and how leaders are planning to reinstate a full education, skills and work curriculum. The focus of these visits is on the theme set out below. A progress judgement is made against the theme. That progress judgement will be one of the following: insufficient, reasonable or significant progress.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders have not ensured that the curriculum fully meets the needs of prisoners. Too few prisoners access in-cell study, such as work packs on vocational topics, mathematics or English. There are too few face-to-face activity places, particularly in the education provision. Leaders, including regional leaders, have taken an overly cautious approach to the number of prisoners they allow to join face-to-face classes. Too many prisoners are on courses that are not challenging enough. Leaders have focused too closely on prisoner interest in a topic, rather than need, when allocating prisoners to courses.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Prison leaders have not ensured that all prisoners can benefit equally from education activities. Vulnerable prisoners and foreign national prisoners can only attend classes in a narrow range of subjects. Prisoners in some work activities benefit from outreach mathematics and English classes, whereas those in neighbouring workshops do not. This has prevented prisoners from catching up on missed learning time.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders, managers and residential unit staff do not place a high enough priority on ensuring that prisoners arrive at education classes on time or attend classes frequently enough. As a result, prisoners enrolled on face-to-face classes arrive late, or too often refuse to attend. Prisoners attend at higher rates in workshops. They work diligently in teams to complete tasks, for example, in the laundry or industrial Progress monitoring visit: HMP Elmley, 22 and 23 June 2021 cleaning. However, too many prisoners with wing-based roles do not work with the same diligence.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Too few prisoners have completed an induction. Prisoners who complete their induction do not benefit from useful information, advice and guidance (IAG) to fully understand their options for education, skills and work. In too many cases, those who complete mathematics and English initial assessments at induction do not find out the results of their assessments. Prisoners rightly express frustration at the delays in joining education, skills or work activities that result from a slow and poor- quality induction process.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Too few prisoners have benefitted from useful IAG during their sentences. A high proportion have not completed action plans, which staff can use to offer relevant support. Although staff who are responsible for IAG are working to reduce the backlog, they have not made sufficient efforts to provide advice and guidance remotely, for example, through the use of the prison’s in-cell telephony system. Leaders have not prioritised access to IAG services for prisoners who are close to the end of their sentences.

p.3

Insufficient progress

During face-to-face lessons, teachers explain concepts carefully to help prisoners develop their understanding. The small number of prisoners who attend vocational classes use their new skills well to produce work that is of a high standard. Prisoners who undertake in-cell work mostly benefit from well-designed work packs. In a small number of cases, level 2 work packs do not provide prisoners with enough challenging activities.

p.3

Insufficient progress

In too many cases, teachers do not use information such as the results of diagnostic assessments or skills scans to plan lessons. Although teachers provide learners with useful written feedback on their work, this does not always have the necessary impact. Too many prisoners do not make use of teachers’ comments and suggestions to make improvements to written tasks. In other cases, teachers provide prisoners with the correct answers where they have made mistakes, rather than revisiting topics to help prisoners make corrections themselves.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers do not have a thorough understanding of the support needs of prisoners. Prisoners with learning difficulties do not benefit from in-depth specialist screening to provide a thorough understanding of their needs, or plans to help teachers and instructors offer support during their work and education activities.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders have accurately identified groups of prisoners who have historically not engaged well with education activities. They have been successful in encouraging a far greater proportion of learners from ethnic minority backgrounds to enrol on face- to-face classes. Leaders rightly recognise that they need to do more to support other groups to engage more, such as those from a Traveller background.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders have developed ambitious and realistic plans for the next stage of the recovery roadmap. They plan to introduce far more face-to-face activities. Leaders Progress monitoring visit: HMP Elmley, 22 and 23 June 2021 also rightly recognise that they need to develop better links with employers to support prisoners who are close to release. They have similarly ambitious plans for greater employer engagement.

p.3

Recommendations

◼ Leaders should ensure that a larger proportion of prisoners can access meaningful education, skills and work activities.

p.4

Recommendations

◼ Leaders should ensure that prisoners receive thorough IAG which helps them to develop their future work, education and career plans.

p.4

Recommendations

◼ Leaders should ensure that prisoners arrive punctually to all education, skills and work activities, and attend planned education classes.

p.4

Recommendations

◼ Leaders and managers should identify all prisoners who need support for learning difficulties, ensuring they benefit from an in-depth screening of their needs and useful support from staff. Progress monitoring visit: HMP Elmley, 22 and 23 June 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Recommendations

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Recommendations

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Recommendations

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Recommendations

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion