Other · Ofsted report
HMP Lewes
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Nigel Bragg
- Postcode verified
BN7 1EA
- Name on report verified
HMP Lewes
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff should use this information to plan and review prisoners’ participation in relevant ESW that meets their needs fully. p.4
- Progress monitoring visit: HMP Lewes, 28 and 29 September 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. p.4
- It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. p.4
- It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. p.4
- If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . p.5
- You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. p.5
- To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk . p.5
- You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn . p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes2
“HMP Lewes Prison education standalone progress monitoring visit report” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 331
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 31, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
HMP Lewes Prison education standalone progress monitoring visit report
p.1
Name of lead inspector: Nigel Bragg, Ofsted Inspector
p.1
Address:
1 Brighton Rd Lewes East Sussex BN7 1EA Progress monitoring visit: HMP Lewes, 28 and 29 September 2021
p.1
Ofsted context and focus of visit
On 17 March 2020, all Ofsted routine inspections were suspended due to the COVID- 19 pandemic. As part of our phased return to routine inspections of education, skills and work activities in prisons and Young Offender Institutions (YOIs), Ofsted is carrying out progress monitoring visits. The visit was conducted by Ofsted alone without HMI Prisons. The visit was conducted on site. At the time of the vis it, the establishment was at stage 2 of Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Services’ (HMPPS) recovery roadmap and had been at that stage for one day.
p.2
Ofsted context and focus of visit
Progress monitoring visits aim to inform prisoners, employers and government on how establishments are meeting the education and skills needs of all prisoners during this period and how leaders are planning to reinstate a full education, skills and work curriculum. The focus of these visits is on the theme set out below. A progress judgement is made against the theme. That progress judgement will be one of the following: insufficient, reasonable or significant progress.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders have very recently prioritised the education of prisoners with low English and/or mathematics skills and those who speak English as an additional language. The use of part-time places has been increased to maximise the number of prisoners who can access education, skills and work (ESW). Occupancy rates for ESW are high, but the number of available places is low. Consequently, a significant proportion of the prison population is not gainfully occupied.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers have yet to implement a recovery plan that ensures prisoners can participate in an appropriate ESW curriculum. Progress to increase the range and variety of vocational training, such as catering, has been slow. The prison’s two workshops remain closed despite the easing of the national COVID-19 pandemic restrictions and those imposed by HMPPS. Until very recently, the potential to deliver classroom-based learning has not been exploited. The prison has no employer links to inform curriculum development. Leaders and managers have not implemented an appropriate ESW strategy for the small minority of young offenders.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Prisoners have no access to the available information technology (IT) facilities. Curriculum planning has failed to give the adequate staffing and use of classroom- based IT classes sufficient priority. Consequently, prisoners have no opportunity to develop the digital skills needed for employment on release. The Virtual Campus is not in use. This hinders prisoners’ learning and achievement, including those who are studying Open University and distance-learning courses. Progress monitoring visit: HMP Lewes, 28 and 29 September 2021 Leaders and managers have rightly identified that the rate at which prisoners fail to complete their planned learning goals is too high. The prison is making good progress in ensuring that prisoners receive recognition for their partial achievements. The allocation of prisoners to accredited courses is not effectively informed by the available information.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Too many of the prisoners working on the accommodation units are underemployed. The prison places an over-reliance on unit-based officers selecting prisoners for roles. This practice is not closely linked to plans that support prisoners’ rehabilitation and successful resettlement.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Information, advice and guidance (IAG) arrangements are not effective. Prisoners receive in-cell IAG packs, but the return rates are low. The proportion of prisoners who have not received adequate initial IAG, including help through the use of face- to-face interviews, is high. Consequently, prisoners have not benefitted from the help they need to make informed and realistic decisions about their career options.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Few prisoners have received an appropriate induction to the full ESW curriculum. Induction packs do not include information on all the available activities. Too often during induction, prisoners’ starting points and assessment needs fail to be checked effectively. However, prisoners who start an education course have their skill levels and support needs correctly identified.
p.3
Insufficient progress
In-cell learning packs are generally of a good standard. Prisoners value them, particularly those who have previously been disengaged from learning. Leaders and managers have responded well to prisoners’ feedback by, for example, introducing basic French and Spanish language in-cell packs. Prisoners are provided with good- quality learning materials, such as coloured overlays or foreign-language dictionaries. Those completing in-cell packs receive appropriate additional learning materials. Teachers provide prisoners with appropriate ‘through-the-door’ teaching. However, this is not always frequent enough to meet prisoners’ needs. Strategies to help prisoners catch up with their studies are effective.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Teachers provide prisoners with encouraging written and verbal feedback on their performance. Feedback usually identifies prisoners’ spelling and grammar errors. However, not all teachers routinely give prisoners sufficient written guidance on how to improve their work or avoid repeating mistakes.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Education staff have a good understanding of prisoners’ individual needs and use this information well to plan their lessons. For example, prisoners who find concentrating difficult have access to ‘time-out’ tables, away from the class. In the newly introduced classroom-based courses, teachers give prisoners effective learning support. However, education staff have only recently started collaborating effectively with other prison services, including the mental health team, to access specialist support. Progress monitoring visit: HMP Lewes, 28 and 29 September 2021 Education staff have undertaken appropriate training programmes to improve their professional competence. Prisoner instructors have not received any ESW related training to help them develop in their coaching and training roles.
p.3
Recommendations
◼ Leaders and managers should rapidly implement a recovery plan that delivers a full ESW curriculum to meet the needs of the prison population.
p.4
Recommendations
◼ Prisoners should have access to IT training and facilities that help them to develop digital skills that contribute to successful rehabilitation and resettlement on release.
p.4
Recommendations
◼ Leaders and managers should introduce and implement effective IAG arrangements to ensure that all prisoners make informed and realistic career decisions.
p.4
Recommendations
◼ All prisoners should participate in a comprehensive and effective induction to the ESW provision that includes the identification of their starting points. Staff should use this information to plan and review prisoners’ participation in relevant ESW that meets their needs fully. Progress monitoring visit: HMP Lewes, 28 and 29 September 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Recommendations
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Recommendations
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Recommendations
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.5
Recommendations
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion