Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

HMP/YOI Swinfen Hall

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Suzanne Wainwright

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Suzanne Wainwright

  • Postcode verified

    WS14 9QT

  • Name on report verified

    HMP/YOI Swinfen Hall

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−33Criticalmore positive than 10% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisesecure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings36w0
  • What needs to improve319w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
355
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 3%What needs to improve 24%About the inspection 73%

Full report text

HMP/YOI Swinfen Hall Prison education standalone progress monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Suzanne Wainwright, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Address: Swinfen Lichfield Staffordshire WS14 9QT Progress monitoring visit: HMP/YOI Swinfen Hall, 8 and 9 June 2021

p.1

Ofsted context and focus of visit

On 17 March 2020, all Ofsted routine inspections were suspended due to the COVID- 19 pandemic. As part of our phased return to routine inspections of education, skills and work activities in prisons and young offender institutions (YOIs), Ofsted is carrying out progress monitoring visits. The visit was conducted by Ofsted alone without HMI Prisons. The visit was conducted on site. At the time of the visit, the establishment was at stage 3 of Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Services’ (HMPPS) recovery roadmap and had been at that stage for three weeks.

p.2

Ofsted context and focus of visit

Progress monitoring visits aim to inform prisoners, employers and government on how establishments are meeting the education and skills needs of all prisoners during this period and how leaders are planning to reinstate a full education, skills and work curriculum. The focus of these visits is on the theme set out below. A progress judgement is made against the theme. That progress judgement will be one of the following: insufficient, reasonable or significant progress.

p.2

Reasonable progress

From March 2020, prison leaders suspended all face-to-face learning and training due to the COVID-19 pandemic national restrictions and the restrictions imposed by HMPPS. Instead, prisoners completed in-cell learning packs. Leaders recognised the challenges of learning this way and worked hard to improve the quality of the packs that prisoners received. For example, they tailored packs to prisoners’ additional learning needs.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders identified that prisoners’ initial participation in in-cell learning was low. When restrictions eased, leaders prioritised prisoners who found independent learning difficult to attend face-to-face learning and receive learning support. However, the requirement that prisoners remain in group ‘bubbles’ currently limits the number of prisoners who can join face-to-face education, skills and work (ESW) activities.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Throughout the pandemic, leaders have kept essential workshops open, such as tailoring, grounds maintenance, waste management, and industrial cleaning. Prisoners have continued to work towards accredited qualifications in both in-cell learning and prison industries. For example, prisoners achieved level 1 food hygiene qualifications to work in the serveries.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders have developed a clear and well-thought-out strategy to return to a full ESW curriculum. They have set specific milestones that, with appropriate risk assessment, Progress monitoring visit: HMP/YOI Swinfen Hall, 8 and 9 June 2021 are designed to gradually reopen more classrooms and vocational and work activities. They have planned how they will use these activities wisely.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders ensured that all prisoners who fell behind with their in-cell learning caught up. Those who could not sit formal examinations have now been able to do so. However, the current curriculum does not meet the needs of all prisoners. It does not provide more substantial learning programmes for those on longer sentences, or take into account fully what prisoners have achieved previously in other establishments.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Throughout the period of national restrictions, prisoners had limited access to careers information, advice and guidance. This service is now in place and suitably qualified advisers support prisoners. Managers ensure that advisers meet new prisoners at the expected contracted intervals. However, prisoners who have been at the prison for a while do not yet have access to the same levels of information, advice and guidance.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Through the recruitment of new staff, leaders have ensured that staff carry out assessments of all new prisoners’ starting points. They have successfully overcome the significant backlog in assessments arising from staff vacancies. All prisoners have now completed an initial assessment of their English and mathematical skills.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Managers ensure that tutors are well prepared to support the needs of prisoners who attend education. Since returning to learning in formal classroom settings, prisoners have accelerated the progress they make, particularly in English and personal and social development courses. They produce work that is of a high standard. Tutors mark submitted work accurately. They provide useful feedback to prisoners on how to improve their work.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Instructors in prison workshops provide effective coaching and training. During national restrictions, prisoners used in-cell learning packs to help them to understand their job roles and the behaviours and expectations required of them. Prisoners in workshops demonstrate safe working practices, particularly in the fencing workshop where they use power tools, including nail guns.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Workshop instructors make specific links between English and mathematical skills and the high-quality commercial work that prisoners complete. For example, in the tailoring workshop, prisoners spend 30 minutes per day working on English and mathematics workbooks. Consequently, prisoners can explain clearly how they apply their mathematical skills to controlling stock and monitoring production targets. Instructors make good use of personal learning plans to agree behavioural and personal development targets. They review these frequently to celebrate prisoners’ progress.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Throughout the national restrictions, prisoners had prompt access to the learning resources and materials that they needed to complete their in-cell learning, such as dictionaries and calculators. However, they could not and cannot yet access Progress monitoring visit: HMP/YOI Swinfen Hall, 8 and 9 June 2021 information and communication technology (ICT), such as computers, including the Virtual Campus. This hinders the development of their ICT skills and prevents prisoners on distance-learning programmes from progressing more quickly in their learning.

p.3

Reasonable progress

As tutors could not access residential units, prisoners completing in-cell training have not received sufficient additional learning support. Residential units do not have in- cell telephony, or other useful technology, to support communications between prisoners and tutors. Tutors provided some ‘through-the-door’ coaching, when permitted. Prisoners on distance-learning courses do not have face-to-face or telephone access to their tutors. All communication is via the postal system, which reduces the timeliness of the support that prisoners need during their studies.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Staff refer prisoners who they assess as requiring additional learning support, have pre-existing education, health and care plans, or whose performance at work causes concern to specialist staff for further assessments. Prisoners receive an appropriate support plan to help them progress and/or improve their performance.

p.4

Recommendations

◼ Prison leaders must ensure that the education and skills curriculum meets the needs and interests of prisoners serving long sentences and those who have already completed many learning and skills programmes in previous establishments.

p.4

Recommendations

◼ Prison leaders must ensure that they provide appropriate careers information, advice and guidance to prisoners who are serving longer sentences to better prepare them for their subsequent resettlement.

p.4

Recommendations

◼ Leaders must ensure that prisoners have access to digital resources that will support them to progress more quickly in their learning and training, including the Virtual Campus.

p.4

Recommendations

◼ Managers must ensure that, as the number of prisoners attending education increases, they recruit sufficient support staff to meet the learning needs of all prisoners. Progress monitoring visit: HMP/YOI Swinfen Hall, 8 and 9 June 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Recommendations

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Recommendations

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Recommendations

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Recommendations

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion