Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Nuneaton Academy

Inspected 23 Sept 2021 · published 13 Dec 2021 · URN 136158

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    23 Sept 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Herminder Channa, Ian Tustian, Julie Griffiths, Sal Yunus

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    CV10 7PD

  • Name on report verified

    The Nuneaton Academy

  • URN verified

    136158

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationInadequate

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−13Mixedmore positive than 68% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelywell preparedeffectiveambitioussuccessfulsaferespectfulfeel safe
Criticismpooryet totoo manyat risknot effectivelytoo oftennot consistentlyconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1069w−18
  • Safeguarding104w+10

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,141
shorter than usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 53
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of The Nuneaton Academy Radnor Drive, Nuneaton, Warwickshire CV10 7PD

p.1

Inspection dates: 22 and 23 September 2021

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 22 and 23 September 2021

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils do not learn the curriculum well enough. Too often they do not fully understand what they have been taught. Leaders want pupils to learn the curriculum well. This is yet to happen effectively.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders are ambitious for the school and the community it serves. Pupils develop the personal skills and knowledge they need to be successful. They learn how to stay safe, look after their own well-being and be respectful. They are well prepared to make informed decisions about their future.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils reported that bullying in school is infrequent. They say that when it does occur, staff deal with it appropriately. Pupils report that staff do not tolerate inappropriate language, such as homophobic language, if they hear it.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Most lessons are calm and orderly. Pupils behave in lessons and listen respectfully to staff and to each other. Staff and pupils understand the systems for dealing with poor behaviour. These have helped to improve behaviour. However, these systems can mean pupils miss out on lesson time and they do not routinely catch up on missed learning.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel safe in school. Pupils told inspectors that during social times, others generally behave well, although there are some instances of poor behaviour. Many pupils attend the wide range of enrichment activities on offer.

p.2

better?

Staff do not implement the curriculum effectively. Leaders from across the multi- academy trust have considered what pupils should learn in subjects. Curriculum plans are sequenced well. However, there is a disconnect between these plans and what pupils experience in lessons. Teachers often move onto new learning before pupils have a secure understanding of what they have learned before. Pupils do not have the building blocks in place to grasp new learning. Teachers do not identify these gaps and misconceptions in pupils’ knowledge readily enough. This means that pupils are not learning the intended curriculum. Instead, they are often simply trying to remember a series of disconnected facts.

p.2

better?

Leaders expect teachers to use a range of strategies to support pupils in lessons. However, in many instances, these hinder learning. For instance, pupils often resort to simply waiting for, and then copying down answers without understanding the context, vocabulary or meaning. This means that pupils are not learning how to study effectively or overcome stumbling blocks as they learn.

p.2

better?

Leaders have plans in place to promote reading across the school, but these have yet to inspire pupils to read regularly or for pleasure. Staff read to pupils in tutor time, but pupils do not have the background knowledge to appreciate the texts and so do not see this as valuable. 22 and 23 September 2021

p.2

3

Leaders expect pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) to learn the same curriculum as other pupils. However, teachers do not consistently meet the needs of pupils with SEND in lessons so that they learn well. In too many instances, pupils with SEND are removed from lessons because of their behaviour. As a result, pupils miss out on important aspects of the curriculum and the support from an expert teacher. There is a similar negative pattern for disadvantaged pupils.

p.3

3

Pupils’ personal development is a strength of the school. Pupils participate in a range of activities and clubs. Leaders track pupils’ attendance at these and actively encourage other pupils to attend. Leaders rightly see the school as an integral part of the wider community. The personal, social and health education (PSHE) curriculum has been thoughtfully constructed. Pupils learn about the right things at the right time. For instance, pupils learn extensively about digital safety in Year 8 PSHE lessons. Pupils receive timely information about careers and further education. This means that they are well prepared for their next steps.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

All staff are trained well to know the possible signs that indicate a pupil is at risk. They know the systems for reporting these and the need to report any concern, no matter how small.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders work with external agencies well to keep pupils safe. They are working hard to continue to strengthen links with families. Staff know pupils well. Pastoral systems support the safeguarding work of leaders and this is effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders have recognised the potential risks to pupils in relation to online sexual abuse. They are raising awareness of this issue effectively with staff and pupils.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Pupils are not learning the planned curriculum well enough. Their experiences in many lessons do not adequately enable them to develop their knowledge. Teachers do not sharply check that pupils have the fundamental building blocks in place. Hence, pupils understanding is frequently shallow. This leaves them ill- equipped to cope with the demands of the curriculum. Leaders must urgently tackle this disconnection so that pupils remember the content they have been taught, linking new knowledge to what they already know.  Teachers’ professional development has lacked subject specificity. As a result, they are overly reliant on general pedagogical techniques that often lead to pupils trying to learn a series of disconnected facts. As a result, pupils’ understanding is often disjointed. Leaders should make sure that teachers and staff are well trained to deliver the planned curriculum effectively. 22 and 23 September 2021

p.3

4

 Leaders do not support disadvantaged pupils or pupils with SEND well enough. Leaders expect staff to adapt their classroom practice so that pupils with SEND learn the curriculum and disadvantaged pupils engage in lessons. This is not yet happening well. Too many disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND are removed from lessons due to their behaviour, hence missing out on valuable teacher expertise. Leaders must make sure that teachers understand how to help these pupils so that they learn and behave well.  Leaders have been too slow to prioritise reading. Detailed plans are now in place. However, many pupils do not enjoy reading and too few read for pleasure. Leaders must act to make sure that reading permeates all aspects of school life and that pupils develop a love of reading, so that they read widely and often.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 22 and 23 September 2021

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10201023 Type of school Secondary comprehensive

p.5

School details

Website https://nuneatonacademy.midlandat.co.uk/

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 19 and 20 September 2017, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 In September 2020, a new school principal was appointed.  The Nuneaton Academy is one of four secondary schools that comprise The Midland Academies Trust.  The school makes use of two registered alternative providers for a very small number of pupils.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation.

p.5

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform. 22 and 23 September 2021

p.5

6

 During the inspection, inspectors held discussions with the principal and other leaders. They held discussions with teachers, members of the raising achievement board and the trustees of the multi-academy trust, including the chair of the board of trustees.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in English, science, art, geography, history, and modern foreign languages. For each of these subjects, inspectors met with subject leaders, carried out visits to lessons, spoke to pupils and looked at some of their work.  Inspectors attended an assembly and visited tutor time.  Inspectors met with members of staff individually and in groups, and spoke to pupils formally and informally at various points in the inspection. Inspectors also took account of responses to pupil and staff surveys, as well as Ofsted Parent View.  An inspector spoke with staff at an alternative provision.  Inspectors looked at records relating to behaviour, attendance and safeguarding.

p.6

6

 Inspectors reviewed safeguarding arrangements by checking the school’s approach to staff recruitment, scrutinising policy documents and meeting with the designated safeguarding lead.

p.6

Inspection team

Ian Tustian, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Herminder Channa Ofsted Inspector 22 and 23 September 2021

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion