Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Beacon Hill Academy

Inspected 4 Nov 2021 · published 7 Dec 2021 · URN 137705

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Nov 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Alexander Laney, Alun Williams, Helen Reeves, Mike Onyon

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    DY3 1BP

  • Name on report verified

    Beacon Hill Academy

  • URN verified

    137705

Page 2 of 7
Page 2 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−17Mixedmore positive than 9% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedimprovingwell ledsafewell plannedpositiveeffectively
Criticismnot alwaysweaknessesconcernsdeclinedtoo manyconcerntoo slowdisruption

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1000w−17
  • Safeguarding113w−15
  • What needs to improve27w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,109
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 56
Average sentence
12 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%Safeguarding 7%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of Beacon Hill Academy High Arcal Drive, Sedgley, Dudley, West Midlands DY3 1BP

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Good 3 and 4 November 2021

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

This is an improving school. It is well led and expectations of all are now high. The staff form a united team, committed to seeing the school continue to improve.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are benefiting from an increasingly effective quality of education. They study an appropriate range of subjects and learn well in many of them. However, there are weaknesses in how the curriculum is taught in some subjects. Pupils do not learn as well as they should when this is the case. The school has not done enough to promote reading.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Behaviour has improved considerably over recent years. Most pupils behave well and have positive attitudes to learning, but a minority do not. The school is usually calm and orderly, in lessons and at social times. However, to achieve a calm working environment, too many pupils are removed from lessons by leaders.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are safe and well cared for. Staff deal with bullying effectively. Pupils have increasing confidence in staff to support them when problems arise.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school provides a good range of opportunities to develop pupils’ interests and talents. Many pupils, especially those in lower years, enjoy school and are happy. Most pupils attend school regularly.

p.2

better?

Following the school’s last inspection, standards declined sharply. Behaviour deteriorated, attendance became a cause for concern and achievement declined. Over the last two years, leaders have arrested the decline and the school has improved in all areas. The principal and senior leaders lead with honesty and integrity. They are well supported by the Dudley Academies Trust (DAT). Staff value and appreciate the school’s leaders. They are proud to work in the school and morale is good.

p.2

better?

School leaders, supported by staff from DAT, have put in place effective curriculum plans in all subjects. These ensure that pupils’ learning should build from year to year. These plans are being delivered well in some subjects, for example in iMedia and mathematics. In some other subjects, pupils are learning less well. For example, teachers do not routinely check pupils’ understanding. They do not spot or address pupils’ misconceptions. As a result, pupils do not remember what they have been taught.

p.2

better?

The use of assessment is not always effective. Tests and other assessment activities do not always match curriculum content. Sometimes, pupils are tested on content they have not yet been taught. Consequently, assessment information is not as useful as it should be. 3 and 4 November 2021

p.2

3

Leaders have in place strategies to support pupils who struggle with reading. Staff are seeking to broaden pupils’ vocabulary and encourage a love of reading. Several of these strategies have been introduced only recently. Leaders have yet to develop an overarching strategy to promote reading. This work has been too slow.

p.3

3

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are supported well. Teachers plan for their needs and teaching assistants provide helpful support in class. Pupils allocated to the school’s autism spectrum disorder base usually learn with their peers in all subjects. Their learning shares the strengths and occasional weaknesses experienced by other pupils.

p.3

3

Leaders, supported by DAT, have tackled previous high levels of disruption to lessons. Classrooms are now typically places where pupils can learn and teachers can teach. However, this has been achieved at a cost. ‘Supporting Expectations’ (SE) is a room where pupils are placed, usually for five lessons, as a result of inappropriate behaviour. While in SE, pupils are encouraged to reflect on their actions. They complete work, although not necessarily the work they would have completed in class. The number of pupils placed in SE, although falling, is too high. Boys and disadvantaged pupils are over-represented in SE.

p.3

3

The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development is good. Careers education is thorough and well planned. The personal, social, health and economic education programme is comprehensive and delivered well. As COVID-19 restrictions were lifted, the school was quick to reinstate extra-curricular activities and off-site visits. These contribute well to pupils’ broader development.

p.3

3

Trustees possess considerable expertise and provide effective support and challenge for leaders.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders make sure that all staff have been well trained in safeguarding and that they understand their responsibility to keep pupils safe. As a result, staff are alert to the signs that pupils might need extra support. They pass on to leaders any concerns they have. Leaders deal with concerns appropriately, involving outside agencies when necessary. They ensure that pupils get the support they need.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff and most parents agree that pupils are safe in school. A small number of parents who responded to Parent View, Ofsted’s online inspection questionnaire, expressed concerns about pupils’ safety. Inspection evidence did not support these concerns. 3 and 4 November 2021

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The delivery of the curriculum varies in quality between subjects and within subjects. This variability includes teachers’ choice of pedagogy and their checking of pupils’ understanding. Leaders’ monitoring does not always identify these shortcomings. Leaders should ensure that the curriculum is delivered well in all subjects.  Assessment is not always used well. Tests and assessment tasks do not always tell staff what pupils have, and have not, learned and remembered. Information generated from such assessments is not always useful. Leaders should ensure that assessment is well focused on telling staff what pupils have, and have not, learned and remembered.  The school’s work to promote reading has not had a sufficiently high priority. Although plans and strategies are in place, they lack strategic oversight. Leaders should prioritise improving pupils’ reading, especially those pupils whose reading

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

inhibits their ability to be successful in their studies.  Although improving, there remains too much inappropriate behaviour in school. This results in too many pupils being removed from their lessons and missing out on learning. Leaders should continue to improve behaviour in the school so that far fewer pupils have to be removed from lessons.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 3 and 4 November 2021

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10199563 Type of school Secondary Comprehensive

p.5

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1045

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 12 and 13 November 2015, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school joined DAT in September 2017.  The principal took up his post in May 2020.  All the school’s senior leaders have taken up their posts since the last inspection.  The school does not make any use of alternative provision.  The school has specially resourced provision for 10 pupils with autistic spectrum disorder. This is funded by the local authority.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspector(s) carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation. 3 and 4 November 2021

p.5

6

 Inspectors met with the principal, and other senior leaders. They also met with four trustees, including the chair of the trust board and the chair of the local advisory committee.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: mathematics, science, languages, iMedia and business studies. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers and pupils, and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors considered safeguarding by meeting with designated safeguarding lead and other members of the safeguarding team, scrutinising policies and records relating to child protection and examining the safeguarding checks made on staff before they join the school.  Inspectors considered responses from staff to their online inspection questionnaire.  Inspectors spoke informally with pupils at break time and lunchtime. They

p.6

6

observed the school at these times.  Inspectors considered responses to Parent View, including written responses.

p.6

Inspection team

Alun Williams, lead inspector Her Majesty's Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Mike Onyon Ofsted Inspector 3 and 4 November 2021

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion