Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Sacred Heart Catholic College

Inspected 7 Oct 2021 · published 7 Dec 2021 · URN 104961

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Oct 2021

  • Inspectors AI-checked

    Christine Veitch, David Woodhouse, Dean Logan, Dympna Woods, Michael Pennington

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management AI-checked

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    L23 5TF

  • Name on report verified

    Sacred Heart Catholic College

  • URN verified

    104961

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−6Mixedmore positive than 75% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyconsistentlywell-designedeffectiveambitiouswell-plannedhigh qualityfeel safe
Criticismweaknesseslackconcernsseriouspoorlyfaileddeclinenot high expectations

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1312w−13
  • Safeguarding90w+45

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,360
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 53
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
20%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Safeguarding 4%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

Inspection of Sacred Heart Catholic College Liverpool Road, Crosby, Liverpool, Merseyside L23 5TF

p.1

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 6 and 7 October 2021

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel safe at Sacred Heart Catholic College. Most pupils treat each other well and are happy in school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Teachers want pupils to do well. However, staff do not have consistently high expectations of what all pupils can achieve. This is especially the case for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and disadvantaged pupils.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Serious weaknesses in the leadership of the school mean that pupils, including students in the sixth form, do not receive the education that they deserve. As a result, pupils and students do not achieve as well as they should across the curriculum.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders have taken some steps to improve pupils’ behaviour. That said, pupils are often late to lessons and staff do not deal with this effectively. Too often, some pupils behave poorly in lessons or around the school. This disrupts other pupils’ learning. Pupils are confident that staff manage any incidents of bullying appropriately when they occur.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Many pupils enjoy being involved in the wider life of the school. Through charity events such as the annual ‘5K run’, they demonstrate their commitment to the school’s values of ‘effort, kindness, community spirit and empathy’. Pupils described the rich programme of sporting activities available to them.

p.2

better?

Poor-quality leadership has failed to address many of the issues raised at the previous inspection. Leaders and governors do not demonstrate the knowledge and expertise required to achieve the improvements that are necessary at the school. They have taken too long to seek the external support that they need. As a result, there is considerable dissatisfaction from parents and carers about their children’s experiences at the school over time.

p.2

better?

Leaders have not done enough to improve the quality of education for pupils, including students in the sixth form. Although leaders provide a suitably wide range of subjects for pupils and students to study, some curriculum plans lack ambition. They do not set out clearly the knowledge that pupils should learn.

p.2

better?

Weaknesses in how well the curriculum is designed prevent some teachers from choosing the most appropriate activities to deliver new learning. Sometimes, teachers do not use assessment effectively in order to check on whether pupils and students have remembered new knowledge. There are times when teachers do not identify and address pupils’ misconceptions effectively. This prevents some pupils from building on their earlier learning. Consequently, pupils, including students in the sixth form, do not achieve as well as they should. 6 and 7 October 2021

p.2

3

Leaders provide appropriate support for the small number of pupils who need help with their reading. This is helping these pupils to read accurately and fluently. This is particularly the case for those pupils who are at the earliest stages of learning to read and those pupils who speak English as an additional language.

p.3

3

Leaders have appropriate systems in place to ensure that the needs of pupils with SEND are identified. That said, across the school, leaders do not provide teachers with sufficient information to support this group of pupils to achieve well. Some teachers do not have the knowledge that they need to deliver the curriculum sufficiently well for pupils with SEND. Staff who provide additional support for some pupils with SEND are still developing the knowledge and skills they need to do this consistently well.

p.3

3

Some pupils’ rates of attendance are concerning. This is particularly the case for pupils with SEND and disadvantaged pupils. Leaders and governors have not done enough to stem the decline in pupils’ overall rates of attendance. Leaders have not successfully encouraged pupils to return to school following the restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Pupils’ rates of attendance are worse than they were before March 2020 and they continue to fall.

p.3

3

Leaders have acted to improve pupils’ behaviour, but with varying degrees of success. Some pupils continue to cause low-level disruption, which impacts on the learning of their peers. Added to this, some pupils do not regulate their behaviour sufficiently well during social times.

p.3

3

Very recently, leaders have introduced a well-designed personal, social and health education (PSHE) curriculum for younger pupils. In key stage 3, well-trained staff deliver this curriculum effectively. This includes suitable careers education, information, advice and guidance for pupils. However, leaders are still in the process of developing their PSHE curriculum for older pupils, including students in the sixth form.

p.3

3

Leaders have strengthened their efforts to engage with staff. Most staff acknowledge the recent improvements in how well leaders listen and respond to their concerns. Increasingly, leaders consider what they can do to reduce staff workload and support staff with their well-being. However, some staff do not share this view.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff help pupils to develop a sound understanding of how to keep themselves safe and manage risk. 6 and 7 October 2021

p.3

4

Leaders ensure that staff are knowledgeable about potential risks to pupils at the school. Consequently, staff are appropriately vigilant, and they report any concerns promptly.

p.4

4

Leaders work well with those pupils and their families who need help. Leaders provide well-designed bespoke support for individuals. In doing this, leaders make good use of safeguarding expertise from within school and from their external partners.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders and governors do not have the knowledge and skills to secure the necessary improvements to the quality of education for pupils. This means that pupils have not received the education they deserve for too long. They are hindered in developing their knowledge and skills across the curriculum. Leaders and governors should ensure that they access appropriate support to acquire the knowledge to lead the much-needed improvements to the quality of education that pupils receive.  Leaders are not demonstrating the capacity to halt the decline in pupils’ attendance. This means that too many pupils are regularly absent from school. This is especially the case for disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND. Leaders should take swift action to implement more effective approaches that secure improvements in pupils’ rates of attendance.  Some subject leaders’ curriculum plans lack ambition. They do not support

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

teachers to choose suitable pedagogical approaches or approaches to assessment that focus well enough on whether pupils have learned the knowledge that they need. This means that pupils are prevented from building effectively on earlier learning and achieving well across subjects. Leaders should ensure that subject leaders have the knowledge and expertise they need to strengthen their curriculum plans, and support teachers to deliver ambitious curriculums well.  Leaders do not have a strong enough oversight of the support provided for pupils with SEND. Leaders do not use or share information about these pupils consistently well. Some staff are not skilled enough to support pupils with SEND to access the curriculum. As a result, some pupils with SEND do not receive the support that they need to achieve well. Leaders should ensure that staff have the information and the support that they need to meet the needs of pupils with

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

SEND.  Leaders have not ensured that all pupils benefit from a well-planned set of experiences to benefit their personal development. Older pupils, including students in the sixth form, do not benefit from a coherent PSHE curriculum or a carefully planned programme to help prepare them for the next stage in their education, employment or training. Leaders should ensure that all pupils and students have access to personal development opportunities that are of a consistently high quality. 6 and 7 October 2021

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 6 and 7 October 2021

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10202329 Type of school Secondary comprehensive

p.6

provision

Number of pupils on the school roll 1135

p.6

sixth form

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.6

sixth form

Chair of governing body Elizabeth Furlong

p.6

sixth form

Dates of previous inspection 19 and 20 September 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 Sacred Heart Catholic College has two sites in close proximity. Pupils in Years 7 and 8 are mainly educated at the lower school. Pupils and students in Years 9 to 13 are mainly educated at the upper school.  A small number of pupils are educated at three alternative providers.  Sacred Heart Catholic College is a voluntary-aided Catholic school. It is part of the Archdiocese of Liverpool. The school’s last section 48 inspection took place in February 2018.  The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause. This means that pupils in Years 8 to 13 receive information about the full range of education and training options open to them. This includes opportunities for a range of education and training providers to speak to pupils about technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. 6 and 7 October 2021

p.6

7

 Very shortly before the inspection, the deputy headteacher had begun acting as headteacher.

p.7

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.7

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.

p.7

Information about this inspection

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation.

p.7

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors met with the deputy headteacher and other senior leaders. Inspectors met with representatives of the governing body, the local authority and the Archdiocese of Liverpool.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, science, modern foreign languages and history. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, reviewed curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with some pupils about their learning and considered samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors reviewed the school’s records of employment checks and safeguarding referrals. They met with leaders who have overall responsibility for safeguarding. Inspectors spoke with staff and pupils about the school’s work to keep pupils safe.  Inspectors spoke with leaders responsible for SEND and reading. Inspectors also considered information regarding support for pupils with SEND.

p.7

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in class and around the school site. They also scrutinised behaviour and attendance records.  Inspectors spoke with pupils from all year groups and considered the responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire for pupils.  Inspectors held discussions with staff and considered their responses to Ofsted’s questionnaire for staff.  Inspectors took account of the responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View. This included the free-text comments completed by parents.

p.7

Inspection team

Michael Pennington, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Christine Veitch Ofsted Inspector 6 and 7 October 2021

p.7

8

Dean Logan Ofsted Inspector 6 and 7 October 2021

p.8

9

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

9

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

9

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

9

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

9

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion