Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Manor Farm Community Junior School
Summary
Leah Goulding (lead), Alison Ashcroft
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
13 Oct 2021
- Inspectors verified
Alison Ashcroft, Leah Goulding
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
HP15 7PH
- Name on report verified
Manor Farm Community Junior School
- URN verified
110340
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is because the school’s curriculum is not ambitious enough, and staff expectations are not always high enough. p.2
- This is due to weaknesses in leaders’ approach to safeguarding. p.2
- Consequently, they are not aware of the extent of weaknesses in the curriculum or in arrangements for safeguarding pupils. p.2
- The new headteacher has identified the weaknesses in the curriculum and has begun to address these. p.2
- Therefore, individual plans for these pupils are not effective enough. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- As a result, staff do not understand well enough what information they must report and how to identify when pupils may be at risk of harm. p.3
- Staff need to have a good understanding of the signs that a pupil may be at risk of harm so that they know what information must be reported immediately. p.3
- However, in too many subjects leaders have not been clear enough about what pupils need to know and understand. p.2
- Leaders must ensure that all staff are given detailed safeguarding training as a matter of urgency. p.3
- Leaders must also make sure that all the necessary safeguarding policies and procedures are embedded in practice and their work to safeguard pupils is properly recorded and reported. 12 and 13 October 2021 p.3
- However, pupils do not do as well as they should in their learning. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance27
“This is due to weaknesses in leaders’ approach to safeguarding.” p.2Reading & phonics9
“Leaders have not sequenced the reading curriculum effectively.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,258
- about usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 60, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Manor Farm Community Junior School Rose Avenue, Hazlemere, Manor Farm Community Junior School, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire HP15 7PH
p.1
Inspection dates: 12 and 13 October 2021
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Inadequate Previous inspection grade Good 12 and 13 October 2021
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils love coming to school because it is a friendly, welcoming place to be. They are enthusiastic to learn. Pupils are committed to the school’s ethos of ‘love school, love learning’. They behave well in lessons and around school, following the school rules and routines sensibly. However, pupils do not do as well as they should in their learning. This is because the school’s curriculum is not ambitious enough, and staff expectations are not always high enough.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils know that it is good to be different, and they say that it would be ‘boring if everyone is the same’. Pupils get along well. They are caring and kind to one another. As one pupil said, ‘It is like I have a second family.’
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils told inspectors that bullying is unheard of. They talk confidently about being ‘an upstander, not a bystander’ when someone is being unkind. Pupils know who to talk to if they have any worries. They have full confidence in staff to deal with any problems that do arise. Most pupils feel safe in school. However, the most vulnerable pupils are not supported well enough. This is due to weaknesses in leaders’ approach to safeguarding.
p.2
better?
Leaders make sure that pupils learn the full range of national curriculum subjects. However, in too many subjects leaders have not been clear enough about what pupils need to know and understand. Leaders have not considered the order in which important knowledge will be taught. Teachers do not build well enough on what pupils know and can do. This means that pupils do not achieve as well as they should. Governors have not checked on the effectiveness of the school’s work rigorously enough. Consequently, they are not aware of the extent of weaknesses in the curriculum or in arrangements for safeguarding pupils.
p.2
better?
Leaders have not prioritised the teaching of reading and phonics highly enough. Staff do not have the training they need to teach reading comprehension well. They do not check pupils’ learning precisely enough. Phonics is not taught well for pupils who are in the early stages of learning to read. They are not given books that match the sounds they learn in lessons. This means that most pupils struggle to read new words. Pupils do not learn to read as fluently as they should, or with understanding.
p.2
better?
In writing, leaders have thought more carefully about what pupils will learn. Teachers are well trained in teaching writing. They help pupils develop their use of vocabulary to explain their ideas effectively. Pupils have strong knowledge and understanding of different types of writing.
p.2
better?
The new headteacher has identified the weaknesses in the curriculum and has begun to address these. For example, in modern foreign languages (MFL), leaders have provided staff with a well-sequenced curriculum. Pupils achieve well in this 12 and 13 October 2021
p.2
3
subject. They remember important words and phrases. They are confident to use their growing vocabulary when speaking and writing in French. Pupils’ positive attitudes and good behaviour mean that lessons are not disrupted. However, there is more to do to improve the quality of education.
p.3
3
Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) get extra help in lessons. However, adults do not identify the needs of these pupils clearly. Therefore, individual plans for these pupils are not effective enough. This means that the support pupils receive does not help them learn as much as they should. Furthermore, parents’ views are not considered in pupils’ individual plans. Leaders are in the process of addressing this.
p.3
3
Leaders provide a range of opportunities to promote pupils’ broader development. Pupils enjoy learning in the school’s forest school area. They learn to take calculated risks and develop a range of skills. For example, pupils learn to work as a team and to solve problems collaboratively. Pupils are also proud to take on responsibilities. For example, Year 6 pupils enjoy being ‘buddies’ to Year 3 pupils when they join the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders have failed to create a culture where staff prioritise pupils’ welfare and safety. Leaders have not given staff sufficient training on the signs to look out for in order to keep all pupils safe. As a result, staff do not understand well enough what information they must report and how to identify when pupils may be at risk of harm. The culture of vigilance is weak.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders have not followed rigorously the procedures to keep the most vulnerable pupils safe from harm. Leaders do not record their actions well enough.
p.3
Safeguarding
Through the curriculum, pupils learn how to keep themselves safe. Pupils do not, however, have enough understanding of how to keep themselves safe when online.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school’s culture for safeguarding is not robust. Adults’ understanding of safeguarding is poor because they have not been given sufficient training. Leaders’ procedures for recording and reporting safeguarding issues are not thorough enough. Leaders must ensure that all staff are given detailed safeguarding training as a matter of urgency. Staff need to have a good understanding of the signs that a pupil may be at risk of harm so that they know what information must be reported immediately. Leaders must also make sure that all the necessary safeguarding policies and procedures are embedded in practice and their work to safeguard pupils is properly recorded and reported. 12 and 13 October 2021
p.3
4
Leaders must make sure that the most vulnerable pupils are supported effectively to keep them safe from harm. Leaders must also ensure that pupils develop a good understanding of how to keep themselves safe online. Leaders have not prioritised the teaching of reading highly enough. Leaders have not sequenced the reading curriculum effectively. Teachers do not have strong enough subject knowledge. Leaders should prioritise reading, making sure that pupils’ learning builds cumulatively. Reading books should consistently match the phonics pupils are learning. Leaders must train staff so that they deliver the reading curriculum well and pupils achieve the standards of which they are capable. Overall, the school’s curriculum is not ambitious enough. In too many subjects, leaders have not planned the content pupils will learn, and in which order they will learn it, effectively. Leaders need to structure the curriculum so that pupils’
p.4
4
learning builds cumulatively. This will ensure that pupils achieve as well as they should across the curriculum. Governors do not understand the school’s weaknesses well enough because they have not checked on the school’s work with sufficient rigour. Governors need to ensure that they have the skills and knowledge they need to monitor the work of school leaders effectively and to hold school leaders to account for the quality of education and safeguarding.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 12 and 13 October 2021
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10200181 Type of school Junior
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 5 and 6 October 2016, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The headteacher was appointed in September 2021. The school offers before-school childcare provision through an external provider.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 12 and 13 October 2021
p.5
6
Inspectors met with senior leaders, staff and pupils. Inspectors also met with representatives from the school’s local governing body and representatives from the local authority. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, English, MFL and physical education. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also listened to pupils read. Inspectors also looked at curriculum plans and spoke to leaders about some other subjects. To inspect the school’s safeguarding arrangements, inspectors met with leaders responsible for safeguarding and looked at relevant documentation, staff recruitment checks and training records. The inspectors also talked to a range of staff and pupils. Inspectors met with a range of pupils to discuss their views on the school.
p.6
6
Inspectors spoke to pupils informally during playtime, lunchtime and in lessons. Inspectors spoke to parents and staff to gather their views. Inspectors considered all of the responses to Parent View and all of the responses to the survey for staff.
p.6
Inspection team
Leah Goulding, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Alison Ashcroft Ofsted Inspector 12 and 13 October 2021
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion