Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Denmark Road High School
Summary
Lydia Pride (lead), Matthew Collins, Sal Yunus, Teresa Hill
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
14 Oct 2021
- Inspectors verified
Lydia Pride, Matthew Collins, Sal Yunus, Teresa Hill
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
GL1 3JN
- Name on report verified
Denmark Road High School
- URN verified
136666
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils enjoy a rich, stimulating and ambitious curriculum. p.2
- However, Ofsted previously judged High School for Girls to be outstanding, before it converted to academy status in April 2011. p.1
- Most pupils thrive within the school’s culture of high expectation. p.2
- Most pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) follow the curriculum confidently and benefit from supportive teaching. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- As yet, they do not fully have the information they need to support and challenge leaders about the quality of education provided with sufficient rigour. p.3
- Leaders should ensure that pupils with identified additional needs requiring support beyond that of other learners are specifically classified. p.4
- Trustees should continue to work with school leaders so that they can better hold leaders to account for the quality of their work. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,102
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Denmark Road High School Denmark Road, Gloucester, Gloucestershire GL1 3JN
p.1
Inspection dates: 13 and 14 October 2021
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Ofsted has not previously inspected Denmark Road High School under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. However, Ofsted previously judged High School for Girls to be outstanding, before it converted to academy status in April 2011. From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections. The school changed its name to Denmark Road High School in December 2018.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened in High School for Girls’ effectiveness before it closed. Changes in the effectiveness of Denmark Road High School may have happened at any point since it opened. 13 and 14 October 2021
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy a rich, stimulating and ambitious curriculum. They encounter a diverse range of voices and perspectives. Pupils work hard, strive for and achieve success. In lessons, it is typical to see pupils deeply engaged in scholarly discussion.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Teachers get to know pupils and their aspirations well. Most pupils thrive within the school’s culture of high expectation. While some pupils experience this as pressure, demand across the curriculum is appropriate.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
A growing number of pupils report difficulties with their emotional and mental health linked to the COVID-19 pandemic. Leaders support pupils who experience these challenges and have plans to further develop and implement mental health provision.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils have shared with leaders their experiences of discriminatory behaviour. Leaders have listened and worked with pupils and staff to address this. Pupils from minority ethnic groups feel included in the school now more than ever.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Most pupils feel safe in school and have confidence that staff deal with any unkindness or bullying well. Increasingly, pupils identify the ‘Wellbeing Centre’ as a place where they receive supportive pastoral care.
p.2
better?
Through the curriculum, leaders introduce pupils to ‘the best that has been thought and said’. The curriculum is well-structured and implemented. The way in which the curriculum celebrates diversity is a striking feature. Teachers use assessment effectively. As a result, pupils remember and use what they learn confidently. Subject leaders have designed the curriculum to help pupils expand their vocabulary in ambitious ways. This lends finesse to pupils’ writing and helps to deepen their thinking.
p.2
better?
Most pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) follow the curriculum confidently and benefit from supportive teaching. However, in some cases, teachers are not sufficiently clear about the tiers of support in place for pupils with SEND. Leaders are working to ensure that the needs of pupils with SEND are fully met across the curriculum.
p.2
better?
Leaders are proud of the way in which they supported pupils and staff during the national restrictions caused by COVID-19. They have identified a sharp rise in the number of pupils with social, emotional and mental health needs. Leaders are, therefore, increasingly focused on providing support for pupils’ mental health as part of a school-wide strategy. Pupils learn about the importance of achieving a balance between study and leisure activity. They are encouraged to be kind to themselves and to support one another. 13 and 14 October 2021
p.2
3
Most pupils are punctual and attend school well. Some pupils have lower-than-usual attendance, linked to the COVID-19 pandemic. Leaders have established systems to support the attendance of pupils.
p.3
3
Pupils display high levels of self-control and composure in lessons. Their courtesy towards adults is unfailing. However, a few pupils suffer unkindness from their peers. Leaders continue to develop pupils’ respect for each other.
p.3
3
Leaders promote pupils’ personal development through the ‘Learning for Life’ programme. This includes careers education. The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. Pupils, including students in the sixth form, participate in an extensive range of sporting, creative, technical, cultural, and spiritual pursuits. Pupils discuss and debate their views on current and international affairs. They become active citizens who want to improve society.
p.3
3
A new trust board was formed in January 2021. The trustees are a suitably skilled group of leaders. Trustees have begun to think about their vision for the school. They encourage pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds to come to the school and benefit from its ambitious ethos. However, the trustees are in the early stages of understanding the curriculum. As yet, they do not fully have the information they need to support and challenge leaders about the quality of education provided with sufficient rigour.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders use training to develop a culture of vigilance among staff. Staff know how to identify the signs that pupils are at risk of harm. They consider the ways pupils may be affected by sexual harassment and other harmful sexual behaviours.
p.3
Safeguarding
Staff show concern for pupils’ well-being and urge them to report anything that makes them feel uneasy. Pupils are encouraged to talk about their worries with staff in the ‘Wellbeing Centre’.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders ensure that appropriate background checks are carried out on adults working within the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
In recent months, leaders have strengthened their capacity to respond quickly when they become aware of risks to pupils.
p.3
4
There is a lack of clarity about the tiers of support in place for pupils with SEND. This means that leaders do not have clear information on which to base their strategic decisions. Leaders should ensure that pupils with identified additional needs requiring support beyond that of other learners are specifically classified. The trust board is newly formed. This means that trustees are developing their understanding of some aspects of the school’s work. Trustees should continue to work with school leaders so that they can better hold leaders to account for the quality of their work.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 13 and 14 October 2021
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10199284 Type of school Grammar (selective)
p.5
sixth form
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
This is grammar school for girls. The admissions policy is selective. Boys are admitted in the sixth form only. The proportion of pupils with SEND and the proportion of pupils with education, health and care plans are well below the national average for both groups of pupils. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is well below the national average. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is above the national average. The school uses two registered alternative providers. The school changed its name to Denmark Road High School on 31 December 2018. The name of the predecessor school was High School for Girls. 13 and 14 October 2021
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors held discussions with the headteacher, the chair and two co-vice chairs of the trust board, and members of the senior leadership team. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, physical education and science. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, considered curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at examples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also visited lessons, looked at curriculum plans and spoke with leaders and pupils about some other subjects, including the ‘Learning for Life’ curriculum. The lead inspector scrutinised the school’s single central record of adults working within the school. She met with the designated safeguarding lead and the trustee responsible for safeguarding. Inspectors held discussions with single-sex groups of pupils to gather their views
p.6
Information about this inspection
on the culture of the school. Inspectors met with the special educational need coordinator and spoke with pupils with SEND. Inspectors considered 60 responses to the Ofsted survey for staff and 198 responses to the survey for pupils. They also considered 221 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 135 free-text responses from parents.
p.6
Inspection team
Lydia Pride, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Sal Yunus Ofsted Inspector 13 and 14 October 2021
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion