Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Cold Harbour Church of England School

Inspected 20 Oct 2021 · published 6 Dec 2021 · URN 110404

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

James Broadbridge (lead), Francois Walker, Sue Keeling

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Oct 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Francois Walker, James Broadbridge, Sue Keeling

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    MK3 7PD

  • Name on report verified

    Cold Harbour Church of England School

  • URN verified

    110404

Page 4 of 7
Page 4 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+32Mostly positivemore positive than 67% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongpositiveambitiouscleareffectivelywell-plannedfeel safeenjoy
Criticismlacknot yetnot sufficientlyinconsistenciesnot ambitiousdeclinenot happy

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1067w+24
  • Safeguarding102w+68
  • What needs to improve32w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,166
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 56
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of Cold Harbour Church of England School Highland Close, Bletchley, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire MK3 7PD

p.1

Inspection dates: 19 and 20 October 2021

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 19 and 20 October 2021

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils come first in leaders’ eyes. They are well cared for by staff within the positive, Christian atmosphere of Cold Harbour.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders have established clear rules and routines for pupils’ behaviour. Pupils, staff and parents all agree these are changes for the better. Pupils say they feel safe. They say that adults do not tolerate bullying in or outside of school. Pupils happily eat their lunch and enjoy playing with friends in the well-developed outdoor environment.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Adults recognise how important it is that pupils at Cold Harbour have access to rich experiences. Many pupils have never taken part in these before. School trips, for example, are carefully chosen to develop pupils’ knowledge of the world around them.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders recognise that pupils have not previously had the education they deserve at this school. They are determined to achieve their vision of ‘let your light shine’ for pupils but staff’s expectations of what pupils can achieve are not yet high enough. The work that pupils do is not sufficiently challenging. Reading is a barrier for some pupils. In the past, staff have not taught pupils to read quickly enough.

p.2

better?

Cold Harbour has been through a turbulent period since the last inspection in 2017. Changes in senior leadership and staffing saw standards decline. Since the appointment of the executive headteacher in September 2020, this has been reversed. Despite the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, leaders have introduced sweeping reforms which have made a difference. Momentum is shifting and everyone is committed to creating an ambitious curriculum for all pupils. However, there is still some way to go to ensure pupils acquire the knowledge they need.

p.2

better?

Newly appointed subject leaders have reviewed the content of curriculum plans to check that it is better sequenced. In subjects such as mathematics and science, staff show strong subject knowledge in explaining ideas clearly to pupils. Vocabulary is reviewed regularly to help pupils use words correctly in their work. In other subjects, there is a lack of ambition. The selection of topics in some subjects is not enabling pupils to learn as well as they might. There is a tendency, from early years upwards, to focus on skills and on children doing fun tasks. In some subjects, plans do not break down the knowledge into a logical and sequential order.

p.2

better?

Staff lack expertise in delivering the curriculum in a way that helps pupils to know and remember more. Activities set do not lend themselves to pupils building a well- developed bank of knowledge. The written work pupils produce in different year groups is of varying quality. As a result, some pupils are not making the progress they should. 19 and 20 October 2021

p.2

3

In learning to read, children follow a well-planned and sequenced phonics programme. However, because many staff are not fully trained, there are inconsistencies in its delivery. This includes staff sending home additional reading books that do not match the taught sounds. Consequently, the weakest readers are not getting the support they need to learn to read quickly. Sometimes, staff use resources and unhelpful strategies which are not part of the phonics programme. This is not helping pupils who have not yet mastered basic reading skills to catch up.

p.3

3

In lessons, pupils behave well. They display positive attitudes to their learning and relationships are strong between adults and children. Leaders have clear systems in place to ensure that any pupil who may exhibit emotional needs is well supported and does not disrupt the learning of others.

p.3

3

For pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities, leaders work closely with teachers to identify pupils’ needs early. Leaders have trained support staff to work more effectively with pupils in class. Since the last inspection, leaders have ensured parents feel more closely involved with the provision in place for their children.

p.3

3

Leaders ensure pupils can make a positive contribution to society. During the inspection, as part of the school’s Christian harvest festival, pupils had collected an abundance of produce to support local food banks. In the curriculum, pupils learn about the challenges refugees face when seeking asylum.

p.3

3

The governing body is skilled in challenging leaders as to whether school priorities are having a positive impact on pupils’ learning. Governors carry out their own checks in evaluating the school’s improvement journey. They engage with staff regularly, keeping a check on their workload and general well-being.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

A strong culture of safeguarding ensures leaders keep a forensic eye on all children. Communication channels are clear between adults to discuss any emerging worries. Leaders keep detailed records with a clear timeline of actions.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders are shrewd to what is happening in the local area. The school’s learning mentor engages well with families to provide support. Leaders do what they can to access early help services.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils know how to stay safe online. They recognise the dangers of inappropriate use of technology. They know not to give away personal information. 19 and 20 October 2021

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 There is a lack of fidelity to the school’s chosen phonics programme as leaders and staff have not been fully trained. In addition, staff lack expertise in knowing how to support the weakest readers. Sometimes, staff use alternative reading programmes and strategies that hinder pupils learning to read. Leaders need to ensure all staff are expertly trained to teach pupils to read, particularly those pupils who require extra reading support.  The curriculum is not ambitious enough in some subjects. Subject plans do not break down the taught knowledge into steps that build towards clearly defined end points. As a result, pupils are not making the progress they should. Leaders need to ensure all subjects are ambitious in content and that knowledge is developed coherently from early years to Year 6.  The curriculum is not delivered in a way that helps pupils to transfer key knowledge to long-term memory. Leaders’ approach to teaching the curriculum is

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

not rooted securely in evidence. As a result, some pupils are not knowing and remembering what has been taught. To deliver the curriculum effectively, leaders need to ensure staff’s subject and pedagogical content knowledge is strong.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 19 and 20 October 2021

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 13 and 14 December 2017, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The current executive headteacher joined the school in September 2020 and works part time at the school. She is also the substantive headteacher of a local primary school. Most of the governors are new since the last inspection.  The school is in the process of reducing its published admissions number to become a one-form entry school.  The school is not currently using any alternative provision.  As a Church of England school, Cold Harbour is part of the Diocese of Oxford. The most recent section 48 inspection was in June 2019.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation. 19 and 20 October 2021

p.5

6

 The lead inspector met with the executive headteacher, members of the senior leadership team and the governing body, including the chair. He also met with a school improvement adviser from the local authority and had a telephone conversation with a representative from the diocese.  Inspectors carried out deep dives into these subjects: early reading, mathematics, design and technology, history and science. This involved discussion with leaders about these subjects and the curriculum plans, visits to lessons, scrutiny of pupils’ work and discussions about the subjects with pupils, teachers and teaching assistants from the lessons visited.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspection team spoke with staff and pupils. They met with members of the designated safeguarding team to examine leaders’ knowledge, records and actions. This included reviewing checks on the safer recruitment of staff. Inspectors sampled case files to explore how the

p.6

6

school identifies and supports pupils at risk of harm.  Inspectors spoke to pupils from different year groups. It was not possible for the school to facilitate Ofsted’s online pupil survey during the inspection.  The views of staff, including 21 responses to Ofsted’s online staff survey, were considered.  The 26 responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the same number of written responses, were also taken into account.

p.6

Inspection team

James Broadbridge, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Francois Walker Ofsted Inspector 19 and 20 October 2021

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion