Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

The Hemel Hempstead School

Inspected 13 Oct 2021 · published 3 Dec 2021 · URN 117500

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Charlie Fordham (lead), Brenda Watson, Damian Loneragan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Oct 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Brenda Watson, Charlie Fordham, Damian Loneragan

  • Postcode verified

    HP1 1TX

  • Name on report verified

    The Hemel Hempstead School

  • URN verified

    117500

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+24Mostly positivemore positive than 19% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh-qualityeffectivelyeffectivehigh expectationsoutstandingwell plannedambitiousstrong
Criticismunsafeconcernsseriousnot alwaysgapsnot rigorousnot happylower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1287w+20
  • Safeguarding57w+54

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,342
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 74%Safeguarding 3%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: The Hemel Hempstead School Heath Lane, The Hemel Hempstead School, Heath Lane, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire HP1 1TX

p.1

Inspection dates: 12 and 13 October 2021

p.1

Outcome

There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of good as a result of this initial (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might not be as high if a full inspection were carried out now. The next inspection will therefore be a full (section 5) inspection.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils at The Hemel Hempstead School get a high-quality education. They develop the knowledge they need to achieve well in all subjects. This is the same for all pupils.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are keen to learn. As a result, they concentrate in lessons. Pupils say that they behave well because they understand what they are learning. Behaviour is also calm around the school site. Most pupils say there is no little or no bullying. Pupils describe the prompt and helpful way staff deal with their concerns. Pupils say this makes them feel safe at the school. Despite this, some pupils use unkind language towards each other, both in school and outside, which leaders do not always know about.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils understand and follow leaders’ vision of the ‘Hemel Hempstead experience’, which provides pupils with many opportunities to improve their personal development. Pupils lead in many areas of school life. For instance, pupils manage the library and the basketball team. All pupils are encouraged to take part in activities. For example, the most disadvantaged pupils get golf lessons and go to the opera.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils say they are happy at the school because their welfare is carefully supported. Parents and staff agree with this.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The curriculum is well planned. Leaders identify the most important knowledge and skills that pupils should learn. Leaders make sure that pupils’ learning builds on what they already know. For example, teachers check what pupils know when they join key stage 3, or the sixth form, and identify and teach to any gaps. Because of this, pupils confidently apply what they know in a range of contexts and situations. For instance, Year 11 history 12 and 13 October 2021

p.1

2

pupils explain how the compromises Elizabeth I made in her religious policies set an example for society today.

p.2

2

Leaders are ambitious to provide a high-quality education for all pupils. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), for example, benefit from these high expectations. Leaders ensure staff know appropriate strategies to help pupils with SEND. Teachers adapt the curriculum effectively if these pupils need help to understand and access it. Consequently, pupils with SEND, like their peers, show that they know more and can do more over time.

p.2

2

Teachers have strong subject knowledge. They show skill in teaching the vocabulary specific to their subject. In the sixth form, teachers carefully help pupils to make links between different areas of their learning. In the few cases where teachers are not subject specialists, leaders ensure they get appropriate training and support.

p.2

2

Leaders prioritise reading. Pupils discuss and evaluate the books they read. When pupils who join the school are behind in their reading, they get the support they need to catch up.

p.2

2

The curriculum is effective in improving pupils’ personal development. Leaders ensure that all pupils are well prepared for their next steps and to be successful in the wider world. During the pandemic, leaders have ensured pupils still get opportunities to widen their experiences. Parents praise the considerable range of opportunities their children receive.

p.2

2

While there are positive aspects to pupils’ behaviour and attitudes, leaders do not carefully check on the nature of behaviour incidents. In particular, leaders do not find out about how some pupils regularly use harassing language. This could have the potential to lead to pupils feeling unsafe. Leaders tell pupils about the harms of this kind of talk, through assemblies and the curriculum. But pupils say that if leaders asked them more about what goes on, then the school would be able to address this better.

p.2

2

Similarly, although safeguarding is effective overall, leaders’ attention to the recording of safeguarding arrangements is not as thorough as it should be. Leaders do not have clear processes in place to ensure that all the information about safeguarding cases is easily shared. Leaders are aware of this and plan to address it.

p.2

2

Staff say that leaders support them in their roles. Staff are grateful for the range of training they get to help them develop. They say leaders consider their workload, and this helps their well-being.

p.2

2

Governors have reviewed their work to ensure they all understand the strategic nature of their role. They have the skills and knowledge they need to hold leaders to account. For example, there have been some examples of how governors have monitored leaders’ work on safeguarding and behaviour effectively. Governors monitor leaders’ work on the curriculum closely. Governors understand the barriers leaders face. They offer both support and challenge appropriately to help leaders overcome these. 12 and 13 October 2021

p.2

3

In discussion with the headteacher, inspectors agreed that the rigour of safeguarding processes, and leaders being proactive in finding out about pupils’ experiences of harsh language, may usefully serve as a focus for the next inspection.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders have trained staff well so that they know how to keep pupils safe. Staff make regular contact with vulnerable pupils if they are studying at home or at alternative provision. Leaders have clear plans for those on part-time timetables so that they return to full-time provision as soon as possible.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders’ attention to the recording of safeguarding arrangements is not rigorous. While this has not led to pupils being unsafe, leaders would have more assurance of their safeguarding with clearer systems and more thorough recording. Leaders need to improve the clarity and rigour of their safeguarding processes.  Leaders do not carefully check on the nature of behaviour incidents. As a result, pupils feel that more could be done to address the harsh and unkind language some pupils use towards their peers. Leaders should put processes in place to find out about the types of language pupils experience, so they can address the issue more effectively.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good or outstanding school, because it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the section 8 inspection as a section 5 inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the third section 8 inspection since we judged the school to be good in March 2011. 12 and 13 October 2021

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 12 and 13 October 2021

p.4

provision

Number of pupils on the school roll 1260

p.5

form

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

form

Date of previous inspection 17 May 2016, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The headteacher has been in role since 1 September 2018.  The school places a small number of pupils in one alternative provider, Dacorum Education Support Centre.

p.5

Information about this inspection

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school leaders, and have taken that into account in their evaluation.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors held meetings with senior leaders, other leaders, staff, pupils and those responsible for governance. 12 and 13 October 2021

p.5

6

 English, science, history, geography and art were considered in detail to evaluate the quality of education. Inspectors carried out meetings with subject leaders, visited lessons, had discussions with staff and pupils and looked at pupils’ work.  Inspectors reviewed a range of school documents, including the school improvement plan, curriculum plans and school policies.  Inspectors reviewed the 144 responses that were submitted by parents to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and also considered the 95 free-text responses from parents. They also considered 90 responses to the Ofsted staff survey and 220 responses to the pupil questionnaire.

p.6

Inspection team

Charlie Fordham, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Damian Loneragan Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Brenda Watson Ofsted Inspector 12 and 13 October 2021

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion