Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Sir Thomas Boteler Church of England High School
Summary
Rachel Goodwin (lead), Lindy Griffiths, Mark Cocker, Philip Wood
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Oct 2021
- Inspectors verified
Lindy Griffiths, Mark Cocker, Philip Wood, Rachel Goodwin
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
WA4 1JL
- Name on report verified
Sir Thomas Boteler Church of England High School
- URN verified
144799
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Teachers have high expectations of all pupils, including those who are disadvantaged and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). p.2
- Leaders have successfully improved the quality of education for all pupils at Sir Thomas Boteler Church of England High School. p.2
- Leaders and pupils share high expectations of behaviour. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders should roll out their plans to support those pupils who struggle with reading in key stage 4 so that they catch up with their reading and so that they can access the full curriculum. p.4
- Across the curriculum, subject leaders have thought deeply about the essential knowledge that they want pupils to learn, and the order in which they should learn it. p.2
- As a result, most teachers are clear about exactly what pupils must learn to progress through the curriculum. p.2
- Teachers are adept at ensuring that pupils with SEND, including those in the on-site specially resourced provision for pupils with SEND (specially resourced provision), gain the knowledge that they need to progress well through the curriculum. p.3
- As a result, some of these pupils do not access the curriculum as well as they should. p.4
- Leaders should ensure that all subject leaders are trained to check that teachers are delivering the curriculum effectively. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families4
“Parents and carers were overwhelmingly positive about the school.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,112
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Sir Thomas Boteler Church of England High School Grammar School Road, Latchford, Warrington, Cheshire WA4 1JL
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 5 and 6 October 2021
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are immensely proud of their school. They value the sense of belonging that they feel in this tight-knit community. Many pupils told inspectors that they feel part of the ‘Boteler’ family. Pupils were positive about the close relationships that they forge with adults. In lessons and around the school site, pupils behave well.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school community celebrates diversity. Pupils said that the school is a safe space where they can grow, free to be themselves. They are happy. Teachers do not tolerate discrimination of any kind. Pupils are accepting of each other’s differences. They said that bullying of any kind is rare. Teachers resolve any occasional incidents of bullying swiftly.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Teachers have high expectations of all pupils, including those who are disadvantaged and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Teachers support pupils to build a rich foundation of knowledge in each subject. Pupils progress well through the curriculum. They are well prepared for the next stage of their education or training.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils spoke highly of the many opportunities on offer to develop their character and resilience. Pupils in all year groups welcome leadership responsibilities, such as being prefects and anti-bullying ambassadors. Pupils benefit from an extensive extra-curricular programme.
p.2
better?
Leaders have successfully improved the quality of education for all pupils at Sir Thomas Boteler Church of England High School. At key stage 3, pupils follow an appropriately broad and balanced curriculum. At key stage 4, leaders ensure that there is a suitably wide range of subjects that meet pupils’ interests and ambitions. Leaders’ high aspirations for pupils are reflected in the considerable increase in the number of pupils, including those with SEND and those who are disadvantaged, who choose to study a modern foreign language in key stage 4.
p.2
better?
Across the curriculum, subject leaders have thought deeply about the essential knowledge that they want pupils to learn, and the order in which they should learn it. Leaders have detailed and precise curriculum plans in place which carefully outline this knowledge. As a result, most teachers are clear about exactly what pupils must learn to progress through the curriculum. Many pupils acquire a rich body of knowledge and they achieve well.
p.2
better?
Although subject leaders have planned an effective curriculum, in a small number of subjects, leaders do not check how well teachers are delivering the planned curriculum effectively enough. As a result, a small number of teachers do not always choose the most appropriate activities that enable pupils to apply the knowledge that they have learned to different contexts. 5 and 6 October 2021
p.2
3
Across the school, teachers use assessment well to check whether pupils have remembered new learning. When misconceptions arise, teachers are quick to address any errors. Overall, teachers ensure that pupils’ knowledge is secure before they move on to the next steps in learning.
p.3
3
Teachers and leaders are skilled in identifying the specific needs of pupils with SEND. The special educational needs coordinator ensures that teachers are well trained to deliver the curriculum successfully for pupils with SEND. Teachers are adept at ensuring that pupils with SEND, including those in the on-site specially resourced provision for pupils with SEND (specially resourced provision), gain the knowledge that they need to progress well through the curriculum.
p.3
3
Leaders prioritise reading well. They successfully support pupils who are behind with their reading to catch up quickly. By the end of key stage 3, most pupils read with fluency and confidence. However, leaders’ plans to implement reading catch-up strategies in key stage 4 are only just under way. A small number of older pupils have missing reading knowledge, which hinders how well they access the curriculum.
p.3
3
Leaders and pupils share high expectations of behaviour. Pupils behave respectfully. They can learn in lessons without disruption.
p.3
3
Pupils said that they are taught how to eat healthily, maintain an active lifestyle and have healthy relationships. Well-qualified staff deliver high-quality, ongoing careers information, advice and guidance to pupils in all year groups.
p.3
3
Governors and trustees support and challenge leaders well. Parents and carers were overwhelmingly positive about the school. Staff spoke highly about leaders’ support for their workload and well-being.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders ensure that there is a strong culture of safeguarding across the school. This includes the checks that they make to ensure that all adults are safe to work with pupils. All staff have been appropriately trained to identify the risks that pupils may face, including those in the local community. Staff are fully conversant with the processes for reporting concerns. Leaders have secured effective support for vulnerable pupils and their families. They work effectively with outside agencies.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils learn how to keep physically and mentally healthy, including how to stay safe online. They know what to do if they feel worried. Pupils trust staff to support them. 5 and 6 October 2021
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In a minority of subjects, leaders do not check effectively enough how well teachers deliver the curriculum. This means that in some subjects, teachers do not always select the most appropriate activities to enable pupils to deepen their knowledge and understanding of the topics and concepts that they are studying. Leaders should ensure that all subject leaders are trained to check that teachers are delivering the curriculum effectively. Leaders’ plans to develop pupils’ reading knowledge are not fully implemented in key stage 4. As such, a small number of older pupils are behind with their reading. As a result, some of these pupils do not access the curriculum as well as they should. Leaders should roll out their plans to support those pupils who struggle with reading in key stage 4 so that they catch up with their reading and so that they can access the full curriculum.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 5 and 6 October 2021
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10200843 Type of school Secondary
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected.
p.5
Information about this school
Sir Thomas Boteler Church of England High School converted to become an academy school in June 2017. When its predecessor school, Sir Thomas Boteler Church of England High School was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be inadequate. The school uses two alternative providers for a small number of pupils. The school had its most recent section 48 inspection in February 2017. There is a designated specially resourced provision for 20 pupils with learning and cognition difficulties. The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause. This means that pupils in Years 8 to 11 receive information about the full range of education and training options open to them. This includes opportunities for a range of education and training providers to speak to pupils about technical educational qualifications and apprenticeships. 5 and 6 October 2021
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the headteacher, the senior leadership team, middle leaders and a range of teaching and support staff. An inspector spoke with the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust and three members of the local governing body. An inspector also spoke with a representative of the local authority and a representative from the Diocese of Chester. As part of this inspection, inspectors carried out deep dives in English, mathematics, geography, history and music. Inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited some lessons, looked at pupils’ work and spoke with pupils and teachers. Inspectors met with groups of pupils from Year 7 to Year 11. Inspectors also observed
p.6
Information about this inspection
breaktimes and lunchtimes. Inspectors checked the school’s safeguarding procedures and the checks made on staff. Inspectors met with leaders, staff and pupils to evaluate the culture of safeguarding. An inspector also checked the arrangements for pupils attending alternative provision. Inspectors reviewed a range of documentation, including that relating to safeguarding, the school development plans, self-evaluation documents, curriculum plans, minutes from meetings of the governing body and behaviour and attendance records. Inspectors considered the 66 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire for staff and the 113 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire for pupils. Inspectors also considered the views of the 46 parents who responded to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View. This included the 45 comments received via the free-text facility.
p.6
Inspection team
Rachel Goodwin, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Lindy Griffiths Ofsted Inspector 5 and 6 October 2021
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion