Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
St Augustine's CofE VA Junior and Infant School
Summary
Kirsty Godfrey (lead), Andrea Batley
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
23 Sept 2021
- Inspectors verified
Andrea Batley, Kirsty Godfrey
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Early years verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
HX1 5PG
- Name on report verified
St Augustine’s CofE VA Junior and Infant School
- URN verified
107543
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Early yearsInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationInadequate
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Weaknesses in designing the curriculum mean that teachers are not always clear about the intended learning. p.3
- This is the result of weaknesses in the phonics curriculum and lack of subject expertise of leaders and staff. p.2
- Too many pupils do not secure the basics in early reading and writing and are not ready for the next stage of their education. p.4
- This has led to some poor behaviour for learning. p.2
- Many of the weaknesses identified at the last inspection still exist. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders and governors should urgently address pupils’ under-achievement and poor attendance. p.4
- The school’s early reading curriculum is not effective in making sure that pupils learn to read as soon as they should. p.4
- Teachers have not taught pupils to read as soon as they should. p.2
- they need to urgently catch up with phonics. p.3
- However, subject leaders have not identified the smaller steps of knowledge which pupils need to grasp to succeed in each unit and over time. p.3
- Leaders should ensure that training for leaders and staff is a priority. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,491
- about usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of St Augustine’s CofE VA Junior and Infant School Hanson Lane, Halifax, West Yorkshire HX1 5PG
p.1
Inspection dates: 22 and 23 September 2021
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Inadequate Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 22 and 23 September 2021
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Over time, leaders have not taken the urgent action needed to improve pupils’ achievement. Leaders and staff have not had high enough expectations, especially for the younger pupils in early years and key stage 1. Teachers have not taught pupils to read as soon as they should. This has prevented pupils from learning well in other subjects too. Many pupils struggle to access an age-appropriate curriculum. This has led to some poor behaviour for learning. Pupils’ absence is high. This also affects how well some pupils can learn.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The new headteacher has reached out to the community and has worked with staff and parents in identifying shared values for the school. Parents are positive about these recent changes. Staff say morale has improved since her appointment.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils speak positively about their school. They feel safe and recognise that staff are there to help them. Pupils are confident to report concerns about behaviour or bullying and trust that adults will listen and help them.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders are making sure pupils are respectful of other cultures and develop a sense of responsibility. For example, pupils in Year 6 have recently organised a collection of books, games and toys to donate to a centre which helps refugees in the community.
p.2
better?
There have been significant changes to leadership and governance over the last few years. This has deflected leaders and governors’ attention away from the core business of improving the quality of education. Many of the weaknesses identified at the last inspection still exist.
p.2
better?
Governors are new to post. They joined a newly formed governing body in September 2020. They have appointed a substantive headteacher and have restructured staffing. Governors’ current level of challenge and support is not urgently addressing pupils’ under-achievement. Leaders have an overly generous view of the school’s effectiveness. Their plans for improvement do not recognise the extent of some of the weaknesses which persist.
p.2
better?
Leaders have not ensured that the curriculum for early reading is effective. There is a lack of ambition for the youngest pupils. Pupils are not securing the basics of reading and writing in early years and key stage 1. This means that they struggle to take part in lessons and have difficulty accessing a range of subjects. A very large proportion of pupils throughout school are working well below what is expected for their age. This is the result of weaknesses in the phonics curriculum and lack of subject expertise of leaders and staff.
p.2
better?
The English curriculum does not address the significant gaps in pupils’ reading and writing. For example, struggling readers in key stage 2 do not access the support 22 and 23 September 2021
p.2
3
they need to urgently catch up with phonics. This includes pupils who are new to English or with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).
p.3
3
Leaders introduced a new phonics programme in September 2021. All staff are receiving training. Phonics now begins at the start of Reception. However, it is too early to see the impact of this new approach.
p.3
3
The curriculum for science and most foundation subjects is at an early stage of development. The content reflects the broad expectations of the national curriculum. However, subject leaders have not identified the smaller steps of knowledge which pupils need to grasp to succeed in each unit and over time. Because this has not been defined, assessment is not focused on checking how well important knowledge is remembered. Weaknesses in designing the curriculum mean that teachers are not always clear about the intended learning. This results in activity choices that do not provide sufficient practice of key knowledge. In contrast, in mathematics and personal, social and health education (PSHE), leaders have introduced published schemes of work. These are beginning to provide teachers with more support on precisely what to teach and when.
p.3
3
The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) has a clear strategy for improving provision for pupils with SEND. Pupils’ needs are being more quickly and accurately identified. Outcome plans set out appropriate targets for individual pupils. At present, weaknesses in staff subject expertise limit the impact of support for these pupils.
p.3
3
Staff and pupils report improvements in pupils’ behaviour. However, there is low- level disruption when pupils’ work does not meet their needs. For example, when younger pupils cannot succeed, they avoid the task and find other distractions.
p.3
3
Pupils’ absence is high and too many pupils are regularly absent from school. Leaders have not developed rigorous enough systems to improve this aspect of the school’s work. These weaknesses persist from the previous inspection.
p.3
3
Leaders are beginning to plan for pupils’ personal development more effectively. A new curriculum has recently been introduced for PSHE. Theme weeks, such as black history and world festivals, supplement the curriculum. Pupils only have limited access to opportunities to promote character development and increase their engagement in wider learning opportunities.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
The headteacher has prioritised safeguarding. Staff know how to recognise, and report causes for concern. The headteacher makes sure that staff have regular training which responds to safeguarding issues in the local area. 22 and 23 September 2021
p.3
4
During the pandemic, vulnerable pupils were prioritised for face-to-face education. Leaders also implemented effective systems to make sure that vulnerable pupils accessing learning remotely were safe.
p.4
4
The curriculum supports pupils in knowing how to report concerns and how to stay safe, for example when online. Visits from police community support officers help to reinforce messages that affect pupils in this community.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders and governors’ attention has been diverted away from prioritising the quality of education. Some of the weaknesses identified at the last inspection persist. Leaders and governors should urgently address pupils’ under-achievement and poor attendance. The school’s early reading curriculum is not effective in making sure that pupils learn to read as soon as they should. Leaders and staff do not currently have the expertise needed to improve this aspect of the school’s work. Too many pupils do not secure the basics in early reading and writing and are not ready for the next stage of their education. Leaders should ensure that training for leaders and staff is a priority. They should check that the school’s new programme is being implemented rigorously so that pupils quickly catch up with the expectations of the programme. Struggling readers in key stage 2 need urgent support to make sure they rapidly catch up with their peers.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The English curriculum moves pupils too quickly onto complex writing tasks which they do not have the knowledge to succeed with. For example, pupils are asked to write a conversation when they do not have knowledge such as: the concept of a sentence; phonics knowledge for spelling; or knowledge of pen grip and letter formation to write the words they want to say. This leads to some poor behaviour for learning. Leaders should make sure that curriculum plans identify the individual components of knowledge it is important for pupils to secure. Learning should progress sequentially from early years into key stage 1. Activities should build on what pupils know, providing the practice needed for the intended learning to be performed with ease. Leaders should make sure that leaders and teachers have the necessary expertise to implement these changes effectively. Curriculum leadership is weak. In most subjects, leaders have not identified the
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
precise knowledge which helps pupils to get better and make progress in the subject. Teachers often decide for themselves what to teach but this does not build effectively on pupils’ prior learning. Pupils sometimes struggle to access the intended learning because of significant gaps in prior knowledge. Leaders should make sure that curriculum plans identify key knowledge and that this is carefully sequenced within each unit and over time. Assessment should check that pupils have remembered this knowledge. Leaders should ensure that staff are able to make appropriate pedagogy choices to help pupils secure the intended learning and use ongoing assessment to check that pupils have learned the curriculum. 22 and 23 September 2021
p.4
5
Leaders and those responsible for governance may not appoint early career teachers before the next inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 22 and 23 September 2021
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10200645 Type of school Primary
p.6
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.6
School details
Chair of governing body Anthony Hillyard
p.6
School details
Website www.st-augustines.calderdale.sch.uk
p.6
School details
Date of previous inspection 28 and 29 November 2017, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
There has been a period of turbulence in leadership since the last inspection. An interim executive board took over governance from December 2018 to September 2020. The current headteacher took up post in April 2021. St Augustine’s is a voluntary aided Church of England school. Its last section 48 inspection took place in June 2017. The next section 48 inspection is due by June 2025.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. 22 and 23 September 2021
p.6
7
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation. Inspectors met with the headteacher and other leaders, including the early years leader, learning mentor and the SENCo. Meetings were also held with a representative of the local authority and six governors, including the chair of governors. The lead inspector had a telephone meeting with a representative of the diocese. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, science and history. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors talked to leaders, staff and pupils about safeguarding issues. They
p.7
7
examined safeguarding records, including those related to behaviour and bullying.
p.7
Inspection team
Kirsty Godfrey, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Andrea Batley Her Majesty’s Inspector 22 and 23 September 2021
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion