Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Cropredy Church of England Primary School

Inspected 13 Oct 2021 · published 23 Nov 2021 · URN 123090

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Sue Cox (lead), Mineza Maher

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Oct 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Mineza Maher, Sue Cox

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    OX17 1PU

  • Name on report verified

    Cropredy Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    123090

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−7Mixedmore positive than 14% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyconsistentlyknowledgeablecaringenthusiasmfeel safesuccessfuleffective
Criticismnot yetinconsistenciesconcernsweaknessesnot alwaysdisruptconcernnot well planned

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1297w−11
  • Safeguarding104w+6
  • What needs to improve31w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,392
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 56
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

Inspection of Cropredy Church of England Primary School Station Road, Cropredy, Banbury, Oxfordshire OX17 1PU

p.1

Inspection dates: 12 and 13 October 2021

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 12–13 October 2021

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Christian values are the foundation of the school’s ethos. Leaders have placed an emphasis on all staff ‘caring, protecting and guiding’ pupils. Parents are full of praise for the fresh life and enthusiasm the headteacher has brought to the school. They appreciate that improvements are getting underway and like the community feel of the school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel safe at this school. They know that staff are there to help them. Bullying or unkindness happen only very occasionally, and any issues are quickly sorted out.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy school. They especially like playing outside with their friends in other classes. As one pupil commented, ‘It is nice to be friends with the younger children in school.’ Pupils benefit from and enjoy attending the school’s clubs such as netball and choir.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Although pupils behave sensibly in most classes, this is not the case everywhere. Sometimes, pupils are not focused on their learning and disturb others. While pupils experience a varied curriculum, they do not achieve well in all subjects. This is because the curriculum is not planned or taught consistently well enough. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not always get the support they need.

p.2

better?

Since the school’s previous inspection, there has been a succession of interim headteachers and much upheaval. During this time, the school floundered. Since his appointment in April 2020, the headteacher has worked in close partnership with the local authority to stabilise the school. He has started to get things back on course and also addressed many premises and safeguarding matters. Nevertheless, there is still much to do so that pupils benefit from a consistently good-quality education.

p.2

better?

The new phonics programme is bringing about greater consistency in teaching. In the Reception Year, children get off to a good start in reading. Texts are suitably matched to the sounds pupils know so they can practise their reading. Teachers check how pupils are getting on. Extra sessions help pupils who are struggling to keep up. Pupils get to know and enjoy lots of texts during story times and other reading sessions. This helps to broaden their vocabulary and develop their understanding.

p.2

better?

Improvements to the mathematics curriculum have been successful. Curriculum plans map out clearly what pupils will learn. Training has helped to improve staff expertise. There is now a more consistent approach to teaching new concepts.

p.2

better?

The curriculum in key stages 1 and 2 is not coherently planned in subjects other than English and mathematics. Leaders have not considered how pupils will build their knowledge over time. Sometimes, important aspects of the curriculum are 12–13 October 2021

p.2

3

being skipped over. Weaknesses in the curriculum are reflected in how well staff check what pupils have learned and remembered. Consequently, pupils do not achieve well enough in the wider curriculum subjects such as science, history and geography.

p.3

3

In contrast, the early years curriculum is much stronger. Here, leaders have set out a well-considered curriculum. They give particular focus to developing children’s language and communication skills and their personal, social and emotional development. Teaching enables children to build a secure foundation for future learning. Staff are very tuned-in to the needs and interests of children.

p.3

3

There are inconsistencies in teaching in key stages 1 and 2. Sometimes, tasks do not match what teachers want pupils to learn. Some teachers do not take enough account of pupils’ previous learning or needs. This includes the needs of pupils with SEND. Although leaders have identified pupils’ needs, they have not ensured that curriculum plans are adapted to meet pupils’ needs well enough.

p.3

3

Inconsistencies in key stages 1 and 2 are mirrored in teachers’ expectations and pupils’ behaviour. In some classes, pupils conduct themselves sensibly and courteously. However, this is not the case everywhere. In a few classes, some pupils do not settle well to learning. At times, they disrupt the learning for other pupils.

p.3

3

Leaders are committed to ensuring that pupils learn about the importance of diversity and equality. Some pupils told an inspector that it is fine to be different, but that everyone should be treated the same. The school’s personal, social and health curriculum helps pupils learn about keeping healthy and staying safe.

p.3

3

Staff feel supported. Everyone likes the team spirit and the changes the headteacher has brought in. Leaders and governors are keen to build on recent improvements. However, these ambitions are not yet planned out in the school’s strategic plans. Most leaders are relatively new to role and have not yet had training in their areas of responsibly.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Safeguarding has a high profile in this school. Leaders know pupils and families well and are alert to anything that might be a concern. Staff are knowledgeable and confident in following the school’s safeguarding procedures. They ensure that any concerns are swiftly brought to leaders’ attention. Leaders follow up concerns quickly. Record-keeping is systematic and thorough.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders are knowledgeable about the risks that pupils may encounter in the wider community and keep in close contact with local authority safeguarding partners. Governors fulfil their safeguarding responsibilities well and ensure that safeguarding is regularly on the agenda. 12–13 October 2021

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders have not considered carefully enough the needs of pupils with SEND. This means that the curriculum for some of these pupils is not planned well enough to cater for their needs. This is particularly the case for pupils with more complex needs. Leaders need to ensure that they give priority to improving their plans for these pupils.  The school’s curriculum in key stages 1 and 2 is not yet well planned in science and the foundation subjects. Plans for these subjects do not set out clearly the knowledge and concepts that leaders want pupils to learn and remember, or the order in which pupils should learn new content. This means that pupils are not achieving as well as they should. Leaders should ensure that the curriculum is planned coherently for all subjects.  There are inconsistencies in teaching in the school and some teaching is not strong enough. Teachers sometimes plan tasks that are not well matched to what

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

they want pupils to learn or take account of the needs of pupils with SEND. This means that pupils do not achieve well enough. Leaders need to provide training for teachers so that they can implement the school’s curriculum consistently well and meet the needs of all pupils.  Some teachers do not uphold the school’s expectations for behaviour. In a few classes, some pupils do not settle to learning and their conduct disturbs the learning of other pupils. Leaders need to make sure that staff receive training and guidance in managing pupils’ behaviour so that they can implement the school’s behaviour policy consistently well.  Many subject leaders are new to role and have not yet evaluated the curriculum or understand how well pupils are building their knowledge over time. This means that subject leaders do not have the information they need to contribute fully to improving the curriculum. Leaders need to ensure that subject leaders have the

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

training, support and guidance they need to fulfil their roles effectively.  Leaders have not yet put together an improvement plan that sets out how they plan to address the school’s priorities for improvement. This limits how well governors can monitor and hold leaders to account for the progress and impact of their work to improve the school. Leaders need to ensure that improvement plans set out how they plan to improve the quality of education and pupils’ behaviour.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. 12–13 October 2021

p.4

5

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.5

5

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 12–13 October 2021

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10200872 Type of school Primary

p.6

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection 30 and 31 January 2018

p.6

Information about this school

 The school does not currently use alternative provision.  The previous permanent headteacher left the school in December 2018. Since this time, there have been four interim headteachers. The current headteacher was appointed to the school in April 2020.  There have been many changes to the membership of the governing body.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COIVD-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation.  Inspectors met with the headteacher and the leader with responsibility for SEND.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in reading, art and design, mathematics and science. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also 12–13 October 2021

p.6

7

sampled pupils’ work and looked at curriculum plans in other subjects including history and geography.  To inspect safeguarding, inspectors reviewed the school’s record of recruitment checks. The lead inspector met with the designated safeguarding leader (headteacher) and inspectors spoke with pupils and staff. Inspectors also reviewed procedures, records, policies and other safeguarding information.  Inspectors considered the views of staff during meetings with them and took account of the 18 responses to Ofsted’s staff survey.  Inspectors considered the views of parents through the 89 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, and parents’ written comments. An inspector also spoke with parents at the end of the first day of the inspection and on the morning of the second day of the inspection.  The lead inspector met with four members of the governing body including the chair of governors.

p.7

Inspection team

Sue Cox, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Mineza Maher Ofsted Inspector 12–13 October 2021

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion