Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Exeter Royal Academy for Deaf Education

Inspected 23 Sept 2021 · URN SC022216

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    23 Sept 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Justine Hosking, Polly Soper

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    EX8 2AU

  • Name on report verified

    Deaf Academy

  • URN verified

    SC022216

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+44Positivemore positive than 51% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveexcellentnurturingthriveoutstandingrobusteffectivelysafe
Criticismconcernslackinglacknot alwayslimitederrorsout of datenot robust

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1037w+41
  • What needs to improve65w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,097
shorter than usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 43
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 71%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential special school - Deaf Academy 1 Deaf Academy The Deaf Academy, 1 Douglas Avenue, Exmouth, Devon EX8 2AU Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential special school

The Deaf Academy is a non-maintained special school for moderately, severely and profoundly deaf children and young people. The residential provision is located within the school grounds.

p.1

Information about this residential special school

The academy and boarding provision relocated from Exeter to brand new facilities in Exmouth during September 2020.

p.1

Information about this residential special school

Due to COVID-19 (coronavirus), at the request of the Secretary of State, Ofsted suspended all routine inspections of social care providers on 17 March 2020.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The residential special school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Date of previous inspection: 26 June 2019

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: good Inspection report for residential special school - Deaf Academy 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Accommodation is comprised of modern, well-equipped flats, which are furnished with the children and young people’s needs fully considered. Communal areas, such as the garden and common-room area, provide inviting spaces for children and young people to socialise. However, there is a great deal of health and safety signage, and a lack of homely touches, such as wall decoration.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children and young people benefit from nurturing care that is in line with their needs. The individual care provided is also constantly evolving in response to children and young people’s progress and age-appropriate development. Some children and young people were previously limited by their environments. Since moving to the academy, they have gained crucial communication and social skills and access to education, which is supporting them to thrive.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff provide attentive oversight of children and young people with increased support needs. This has had a direct impact in reducing the number of incidents and physical interventions. Children and young people are making significant progress.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The support for children and young people to move on is excellent. In conjunction with education staff, the care team helps children and young people to develop healthy behaviours, keep themselves safe, gain practical life skills and access accommodation.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children and young people love staying at the academy and several spoken with want the judgement from this inspection to be ‘outstanding’. No issues were raised by children and young people regarding the care they receive, and they did not raise any areas for improvement.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The environment throughout the residential area is calm and welcoming. Children and young people were seen to be happy and relaxed, enjoying each other’s company and free time after school. Activities are also available for children and young people to enjoy with the entire academy community.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Support and education for children and young people to understand how to keep themselves safe is thorough and individualised. Children and young people are helped to understand how their bodies work including, the importance of appropriate touch, and how healthy relationships work.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff understand children and young people’s needs well. They address any behavioural issues in a nurturing and respectful way. Young people who are entering adulthood are supported well to take appropriate risks, and this promotes their positive move on to independence. Inspection report for residential special school - Deaf Academy 3 The welfare team is an in-house resource with a wide-ranging skill base. This multi- disciplinary team is promoting the effective sharing and management of safeguarding concerns. Children and young people are confident to access the support and nurture that this team provides. Children and young people were seen to frequent the office during the inspection in a relaxed and informal manner.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Management of allegations is thorough, and appropriate procedures are in place. When there are concerns, action taken is effective. The minimal complaints received have also been well managed. In comparison, compliments highlight the good standard of care provided.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Medication systems require several documents to be reviewed during the administering of medication. This needs to be streamlined to reduce the risk of human error. On a few occasions, medication has not been administered at the correct time. Action taken in response to these errors is robust.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Care-planning documents are child-centred. However, they do not always provide robust guidance for staff to ensure that risk is managed effectively.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Overall, recruitment processes follow good safeguarding practice. However, a robust approach to managing known risk on one application was lacking.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

During the pandemic, leaders and managers ensured that vulnerable children and young people were safe. Staff kept in close contact with children and young people and their families. This ensured that children and young people were able to share any worries or concerns they may have had while away from the academy. Furthermore, leaders and managers sourced satellite accommodation, which enabled vulnerable children and young people to come back to the academy much earlier. Staff also facilitated a full online education timetable and online social forums for all children and young people to prevent them from becoming isolated. The academy has been nominated for several awards, which reflects the significant efforts and creative practice by leaders, managers and staff.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders and managers are tenacious and committed. Their drive to promote best outcomes for children and young people is evident. The entire academy community presents as a large family. Staff know children and young people well and work closely together to provide a good standard of care. The children and young people’s progress and achievement are closely monitored and celebrated.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders and managers are strong advocates for children and young people to ensure that their voice is heard. Admissions are carefully considered, and additional training is facilitated for staff in line with children and young people’s needs. This ensures that staff have the skills and knowledge required to promote the children and young people’s best interests. Inspection report for residential special school - Deaf Academy 4 Leaders and managers have developed their own in-house resources to meet the needs of children and young people. However, numerous education, health and care (EHC) plans are out of timescales. Subsequent challenge to the relevant local authority is lacking. This does not ensure accountability and important external oversight.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Managers have not provided staff with the equipment to communicate with each other. Staff are currently using their own mobile phones to share information about children and young people. This means that information about children and young people is not securely shared. There is a plan to provide staff with work phones.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Shortfalls raised at the last inspection have been addressed and all national minimum standards are met. Inspection report for residential special school - Deaf Academy 5

p.4

Recommendations

 Ensure effective challenge to local authorities when EHC plans are out of date.  Consider further ways to manage medication administration that minimise the risk of error.  Ensure that care-planning documents promote risk management effectively.  Ensure that recruitment processes include clear analysis when known risk is evident.  Ensure that staff have work phones to support secure communication in the accommodation areas.

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school - Deaf Academy 6

p.5

Residential special school details

Social care unique reference number: SC022216

p.6

Residential special school details

Headteacher/teacher in charge: Sylvan Dewing

p.6

Residential special school details

Type of school: Residential Special School

p.6

Residential special school details

Email address: reception@thedeafacademy.ac.uk

p.6

Inspectors

Polly Soper, Social Care Inspector (lead) Justine Hosking, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential special school - Deaf Academy 7 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion