Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Abbot's Way School

Inspected 8 Oct 2021 · published 16 Nov 2021 · URN 148006

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Nathan Kemp (lead), Tracey Reynolds

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    8 Oct 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Nathan Kemp, Tracey Reynolds

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    BA6 9SR

  • Name on report verified

    Abbot’s Way School

  • URN verified

    148006

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+9Mostly positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh-qualityfeel safeenjoythriveknowledgeablepositiveeffectiveindependent
Criticismlacksconcernsweaknesseslackconcerninconsistenciestoo lownot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1113w+20
  • Safeguarding115w−46
  • What needs to improve36w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,232
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 56
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 39%

Full report text

Inspection of Abbot’s Way School St Mary’s Road, Meare, Somerset BA6 9SR

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

Does the school meet the independent school standards?

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Abbot’s Way School provides a calm and nurturing environment for pupils to learn. Pupils feel safe and valued by staff. They enjoy the school’s impressive natural grounds, which stretch back to the River Brue.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Staff want the best for pupils. They know pupils, their families and their interests well. Pupils have settled at the school and attend well. Leaders prioritise making sure that pupils are ready to learn. They have achieved this goal. Pupils are now ready to be challenged and to thrive. However, expectations of what pupils can achieve are not aspirational enough.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils behave well and show respect to their peers and members of staff. Pupils focus well in lessons, and bullying is rare. However, they are less enthusiastic about some subjects than others, particularly when work lacks challenge. Teachers know what they want pupils to achieve, but have not given enough consideration to the smaller steps needed for pupils to reach these goals.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) receive high-quality specialist support. Knowledgeable staff provide therapy sessions that are precisely matched to pupils’ needs. Academic targets are less precise, and teachers use these less well in lessons to tailor the curriculum to individual need.

p.2

better?

Since the school opened, leaders have quickly established a school where pupils feel safe and valued. Leaders have ensured that the independent school standards are met in full.

p.2

better?

Parents and carers overwhelming agree that the school plays a vital role for pupils who attend, particularly as pupils’ prior schooling has often been less successful elsewhere.

p.2

better?

Leaders know the school’s strengths and weaknesses well. However, they acknowledge that pupils achieve more in some subjects compared with others. Leaders recognise that there is more to do to improve the quality of curriculum plans. Leaders have not scrutinised curriculum plans or teaching enough to make sure these support pupils’ progress well.

p.2

better?

Pupils follow a broad and varied curriculum. Curriculum leaders have had autonomy when developing curriculum plans. Where strongest, teaching builds on pupils’ prior learning, and sequences of lessons build toward clear curriculum goals. Pupils can remember what they have learned and know how activities, such as off-site visits to a gurdwara, help deepen their understanding. Where weakest, the curriculum is sequenced less well and does not match what pupils already know well enough. At times, pupils find activities lack purpose because they have already learned and remembered that part of the school’s curriculum. 6 to 8 October 2021 The advisory body, brought in to provide an extra layer of scrutiny of school leaders, has played its part in getting the school to where it is now. Until recently, it has not focused enough on the education provided for pupils.

p.2

better?

The school’s personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) curriculum is still in its infancy. Pupils learn how to lead healthy lives, ranging from healthy eating to understanding the difference between positive and negative relationships. Pupils also identify potential signs of a coercive relationship. The school’s ‘learning for life’ curriculum is beginning to help pupils prepare for life in modern Britain and to understand the importance of fundamental British values. Leaders have ensured that pupils have access to impartial careers guidance to help them think about what they would like to do in the future. The school provides an after-school club, but this does not extend to deliberate development of pupils’ talents.

p.3

better?

Pupils enjoy reading. They read books that broadly match their reading ability. The newly appointed curriculum leader has brought in a coherent reading curriculum, which helps pupils learn about a range of increasingly challenging fiction and non- fiction texts. However, these plans have only just begun to be taught in class. Until recently, leaders prioritised pupils knowing how to read and to have positive attitudes towards reading. This work is paying off. Pupils read regularly and develop their understanding of what they have read well. Pupils who require phonics support receive this by way of interventions.

p.3

better?

The school exclusively educates pupils with SEND. The highly knowledgeable special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) has ensured that closely matched targets are in place to support pupils’ specific needs. However, academic targets are less precise and do not identify gaps in pupils’ knowledge. Pupils have access to high-quality therapies and interventions, such as for speech and language, but curriculum adaptation in lessons does not support pupils’ academic progress as closely. Pupils’ progress against the school’s curriculum is not as strong.

p.3

better?

Pupils behave well both in lessons and around the school. They are polite and courteous. Leaders have taken appropriate steps to ensure that pupils attend well, particularly for pupils who have missed significant schooling in the past. Staff use praise to build pupils’ confidence and self-esteem, which is mostly effective. However, expectations of what pupils can achieve are not high enough. As a result, pupils receive praise for work they have completed, even though it occasionally lacks care.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders carry out the necessary recruitment checks on staff before they commence employment. They store these checks on the school’s single central record, which leaders regularly check to ensure that it is current and free of any gaps. 6 to 8 October 2021 Leaders provide training for staff, so they know their safeguarding responsibilities well. Staff know what to do if they have a concern about pupils’ welfare, passing concerns directly to safeguarding leads and logging these on the school’s record- keeping system. Leaders review concerns and take appropriate action to ensure that pupils are not at further risk. They consult with the local authority and external agencies well.

p.3

(Information for the school and proprietor)

 Senior leaders have given curriculum leaders autonomy to design and implement curriculum plans. These plans vary in quality depending on the expertise of the curriculum leader. Senior leaders need to ensure that curriculum leaders design high-quality curriculum plans, so that inconsistencies across subjects are diminished. Senior leaders and the advisory body will need to ensure that teachers are implementing these curriculum plans well.  Curriculum plans vary in quality from subject to subject. In some subjects, it is not clear how plans consider what pupils already know or how the plans build towards curriculum milestones. The academic targets for pupils with SEND are too vague because of this. Leaders need to make sure that curriculum plans and pupils’ targets support pupils with SEND to know and remember more.  Teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve are often too low. Pupils are praised by staff for work that lacks substance. Leaders need to ensure that staff

p.4

(Information for the school and proprietor)

consistently expect pupils to produce work of good quality.  The recently appointed leader for English has implemented a new reading curriculum. Up to this point, leaders prioritised pupils enjoying reading and being able to read fluently. Leaders need to embed the new curriculum fully, so that pupils read critically, and increasingly understand challenging fiction and non- fiction texts.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the provider and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted . 6 to 8 October 2021

p.4

School details

Type of school Other independent special school

p.5

School details

Headteacher Hellen Lush and Gareth Wright

p.5

School details

Annual fees (day pupils) £18,981 to £23,379

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected 6 to 8 October 2021

p.5

Information about this school

 The two members of the proprietor body are also the joint headteachers of the school. An advisory body has been established to check on the school’s work and its compliance with the independent school standards.  This was the school’s first standard inspection since it opened in December 2020.  Most pupils have an education, health and care (EHC) plan. The school provides specialist education for pupils with: specific learning difficulties; speech, language and communication needs; and sensory and/or physical needs.  The school does not use any alternative provision.

p.6

Information about this inspection

Inspectors carried out this inspection under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008. The purpose of the inspection is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The school meets the independent school standards. These are the requirements set out in the schedule to the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014.

p.6

Information about this inspection

This was the first routine inspection the school had received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders, and have taken that into account in their evaluation.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors carried out deep dives in early reading, mathematics, science, and art and design. Inspectors met with senior leaders and curriculum leaders, considered pupils’ work, visited lessons and spoke with staff and pupils.  Inspectors met with a representative from the advisory body and considered minutes from the advisory body’s meetings.  Inspectors met with the designated safeguarding leads to evaluate the school’s safeguarding procedures and to check safeguarding records, including the school’s single central record.  Meetings were held with leaders to determine how well they support pupils’ personal development, and promote strong attendance and positive behaviour.  Inspectors carried out a range of activities to determine whether the independent school standards are met in full. These activities included: consideration of the site and premises; scrutinising the information the school provide to parents,

p.6

Information about this inspection

including the complaints policy and records; and considering how leaders ensure pupils’ health, safety and welfare are protected.  Inspectors considered responses to the staff survey. They also considered responses to Ofsted’s questionnaire, Parent View. 6 to 8 October 2021  During this visit, inspectors also carried out a material change inspection in respect of the school’s desire to increase its maximum number of pupils on roll from 15 to 23. The school’s proposed change to the maximum number of pupils

p.6

Information about this inspection

The school has applied to the Department for Education (DfE) to make a material change to its registration. At the DfE’s request, inspectors checked whether the school is likely to meet the relevant independent school standards if the DfE decides to approve the change. This part of the inspection was carried out under section 162(4) of the Education Act 2002.

p.7

Information about this inspection

 The outcome of this part of the inspection is: The school is likely to meet the relevant independent school standards if the material change relating to the school provision is implemented.

p.7

Information about this inspection

This is the second time that the proprietor body has requested a material change to increase the number of pupils on the school’s roll from 15 to 23.

p.7

Information about this inspection

In order to accommodate more pupils, leaders intend to use additional premises. These premises are situated just over a mile away from the existing main site. The additional premises are suitable for the proposed increase. School leaders have ensured that the independent school standards are likely to be met if the material change is implemented.

p.7

Inspection team

Nathan Kemp, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Tracey Reynolds Her Majesty’s Inspector 6 to 8 October 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion