Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Ash Church of England Primary School
Summary
Matt Middlemore (lead), Wendy Marriott
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
23 Sept 2021
- Inspectors verified
Matt Middlemore, Wendy Marriott
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
TA12 6NS
- Name on report verified
Ash Church of England Primary School
- URN verified
123814
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Nevertheless, the lack of professional development for curriculum leaders has contributed to a weak curriculum. p.2
- The designated safeguarding lead ensures that staff are well trained in identifying pupils who may be at risk of harm. p.3
- Systems for checking the knowledge pupils have learned are not effective. p.2
- The curriculum for reading in key stage 2 is weak. p.3
- This hinders their ability to identify any areas of weakness and provide leaders with appropriate challenge and support. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This school was last inspected 15 years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. p.1
- This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time. p.1
- From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections. p.1
- Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last inspection. 22 and 23 September 2021 p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics6
“The curriculum for reading in key stage 2 is weak.” p.3Personal development6
“Pupils enjoy the wide range of clubs on offer.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,408
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 18%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Ash Church of England Primary School Main Street, Ash, Martock, Somerset TA12 6NS
p.1
Inspection dates: 22 and 23 September 2021
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
This school was last inspected 15 years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last inspection. 22 and 23 September 2021
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Ash Primary School provides a calm and safe place to learn. Pupils attend regularly and enjoy coming to school. A few parents raised concerns about bullying. However, pupils say that since the arrival of the new headteacher, incidents of bullying have stopped. Pupils trust adults to help them if they have a worry or concern.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils behave well at social times and generally get on well together. They are polite and courteous. However, in some lessons, pupils’ behaviour is not good. This happens when work is not matched closely enough to pupils’ ability. Pupils lose interest in their work and become easily distracted.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
During the pandemic, leaders ensured that pupils could continue to access extra- curricular activities. Pupils enjoy the wide range of clubs on offer. They are proud to represent the school in many local community events.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders’ expectations for what pupils can achieve are not high enough. This is reflected in the curriculum that pupils follow. As a result, pupils do not achieve as well as they could.
p.2
better?
The headteacher is committed to improving the school. Since her appointment, she rightly prioritised work on improving systems to ensure pupils are safe. In addition, she has identified which aspects of the school’s work are not yet good enough.
p.2
better?
To some extent, leaders’ plans for improvement have slowed because of the pandemic. Nevertheless, the lack of professional development for curriculum leaders has contributed to a weak curriculum. Some staff do not yet have the skills required to improve the curriculum. In some subjects, the curriculum is not well planned. Lessons are not well organised. They do not build on what pupils already know. This leads to some pupils not being able to remember key knowledge and skills.
p.2
better?
In subjects such as science, computing and physical education (PE), the curriculum is better planned. In PE, for example, pupils gain the knowledge and skills they need to be successful. This knowledge is well thought out as pupils progress through the school. Over time, pupils have had much success in local sport competitions.
p.2
better?
Teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve are too low, including in the early years. Systems for checking the knowledge pupils have learned are not effective. Consequently, teaching staff do not have accurate information about what pupils already know. This leads to curriculum plans not meeting the needs of pupils, including for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities. As a result, some pupils lose interest in their work and become distracted.
p.2
better?
Leaders have recently introduced a new curriculum for phonics. The early signs are that it is having a positive impact on pupils’ ability to read. Leaders ensure that 22 and 23 September 2021
p.2
3
children in the Nursery class experience a wide range of vocabulary. As soon as they are ready, they start to learn how to read. Children in the Reception class use their new sounds well to write with growing confidence. Leaders have put in place systems to help pupils who struggle with their reading to catch up. Pupils enjoy reading. However, there is no planned curriculum for reading in key stage 2. As a result, some pupils in key stage 2 have gaps in their knowledge.
p.3
3
Leaders have been working on promoting pupils’ personal development. When children join the Nursery class, they settle quickly and enjoy being in school. Children are eager to learn. Leaders have introduced careers fairs to help older pupils gain knowledge of local and national industries. Pupils develop an appropriate awareness of how to respect one another. Nevertheless, some pupils have a limited understanding of fundamental British values. This leads to pupils having confused views of different religions and cultures in modern Britain.
p.3
3
Governors do not have an accurate perception of the quality of education. This is because systems for checking on leaders’ work are not precise enough. In addition, they do not meet their statutory obligations well enough. Governors do not have a sharp enough focus on the impact of additional funding. This lack of oversight has contributed to governors not having an accurate view of the quality of education.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders have improved systems to keep children safe. Recruitment processes for new staff are robust. The designated safeguarding lead ensures that staff are well trained in identifying pupils who may be at risk of harm. Regular checks on staff’s safeguarding knowledge ensure that they remain vigilant. Everyone understands their roles and responsibilities. Staff know what to do if they have a concern about a child. Leaders work closely with pupils and families to understand the risks associated with the internet. Pupils can talk confidently about the different ways to stay safe.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Some subjects are not well organised, including in the early years. This leads to some pupils not knowing and understanding what they should. Leaders need to ensure that the content of all subject plans are well organised, and that teachers’ subject knowledge is of an equally high standard. The curriculum for reading in key stage 2 is weak. Leaders have not considered what they want pupils to achieve by the end of each year group. Because of these issues, pupils have gaps in their knowledge and understanding. Leaders need to ensure that the content of the key stage 2 reading curriculum is well thought out. 22 and 23 September 2021
p.3
4
Teachers’ expectations of what some pupils can achieve, including in the early years, are not high enough. Teachers do not always use what they know about what pupils can already do to plan a suitably ambitious curriculum. This limits what some pupils can achieve. In turn, some pupils lose focus and engage in low- level disruption. Leaders need to ensure that the curriculum is ambitious for all pupils and that teachers have high expectations of pupils. There has been insufficient professional development for curriculum leaders. This has hampered their ability to design and implement an effective curriculum. As a result, in some subjects, pupils have not grasped key ideas. Senior leaders need to ensure that all curriculum leaders have the appropriate professional development they need to improve the quality of the curriculum. Systems for checking what pupils know and remember in some subjects are
p.4
4
weak. This leads to some pupils not knowing the curriculum as well as they should. Leaders need to ensure that systems for checking what pupils know provide teachers with the information they need to support pupils in developing their knowledge and understanding. The curriculum for personal development does not help pupils to fully understand fundamental British values or provide pupils with enough opportunities to learn about different cultures. This means that pupils are not well prepared for some aspects of life in modern Britain. Leaders must ensure that the curriculum enables pupils to develop a secure understanding of British values and different cultures. Governors do not have an accurate view of the quality of education. This hinders their ability to identify any areas of weakness and provide leaders with appropriate challenge and support. Governors’ oversight of the effectiveness of leaders’ work needs to improve.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 22 and 23 September 2021
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10199298 Type of school Primary
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 9 October 2006, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The headteacher joined the school in September 2020. In January 2021, the school opened nursery provision for two-year-olds. The school is designated as having a religious character and received its section 48 inspection in October 2017, when this aspect of the school’s work was graded as good.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, curriculum leaders, the special educational needs coordinator, a representative from the local authority and teaching and support staff. 22 and 23 September 2021
p.5
6
The lead inspector met with the chair of the governing body. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, computing and PE. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to pupils about their learning, looked at samples of pupils’ work and listened to pupils read. Inspectors examined a range of documentation provided by the school, including leaders’ self-evaluation, improvement plans and documentation relating to attendance and behaviour. Inspectors scrutinised safeguarding records, tested staff’s safeguarding knowledge and spoke with pupils. The lead inspector also met with the designated safeguarding leader. Inspectors considered the 62 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View. They also took into consideration the 14 responses to the survey for staff.
p.6
Inspection team
Matt Middlemore, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Wendy Marriott Ofsted Inspector 22 and 23 September 2021
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion