Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Cambian Dilston College

Inspected 16 Sept 2021 · published 11 Nov 2021 · URN 131868

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Sept 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Angie Fisher, Neil Clark, Rachel Angus, Suzanne Wainwright

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall AI-checked

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    Cambian Dilston College

  • URN verified

    131868

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−49Criticalmore positive than 19% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveambitiousconsistentlyhigh expectationsaccuratelyhigh-qualityenjoysuccessfully
Criticismweaknessesnot effectivenot sufficientlypoortoo manyconcernslackpoorly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionSafeguardingWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1247w−61
  • Safeguarding228w−82
  • What needs to improve267w+21

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,701
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 53
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 6
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 56%Safeguarding 10%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 22%

Full report text

Inspection dates: 14 to 16 September 2021

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Provision for learners with high needs Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Information about this provider

Cambian Dilston College offers day and residential placements of up to 52 weeks a year for young people with a learning disability, autism spectrum disorder or other complex needs. The college is situated on a nine-acre site in rural Northumberland. Learners attend lessons in a range of subjects, including English, mathematics, animal care, art, catering, information and communication technology, and horticulture. As part of their learning programmes, learners care for a number of farm animals, such as sheep, goats and hens. Over recent years, admissions to the college have included an increase in the number of learners with complex and challenging needs and behaviours.

p.1

Information about this provider

The college is owned by the Cambian Group, which specialises in the education of children and young people with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) nationally. At the time of the inspection, 18 young people attended the college, 15 of whom were on programmes that were in scope for the inspection. 14 to 16 September 2021

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Leaders and managers have not maintained a culture that promotes and reinforces positive behaviour and high standards. Learning environments are not routinely calm and orderly. For instance, learners often leave their lessons for extended periods of time, distracting others. A few learners engage in challenging behaviour. This disruption results in learners missing valuable learning. Consequently, learners do not develop the knowledge, skills and behaviours that they need for the next stage of their education, employment or independent living.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Learners do not receive a rich or inclusive curriculum that meets their individual needs and prepares them for adulthood. Leaders and managers do not promote equality of opportunity for learners in all aspects of the curriculum. For example, learners with the most complex needs do not participate in the same learning that their more able peers receive. This includes lessons relating to understanding healthy lifestyles and relationships, including sexual relationships.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Too many learning resources and activities are not age appropriate. For example, learners read ‘The Three Little Pigs’ during ‘story time’ and sang ‘Nellie the Elephant’ and ‘Old MacDonald’ in music therapy sessions. The use of children’s nursery rhymes is not helpful in developing the character of young adults. Resources also include picture cards that are not suitable for adult learners. These resources use cartoon imagery rather than depicting real-life situations that would be more beneficial to older learners.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Leaders and governors do not promote high expectations or ambitions for their learners through their investment in, and care of the campus. A few areas of the college estate are in a poor state of repair. For example, in the horticulture section, the raised beds are unkempt and overgrown and the polytunnels are poorly maintained. Staff use parts of the horticulture area as a rubbish tip. This is not setting industry standards for learners.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Most learners say that they enjoy attending the college. Staff deal with any issues that learners raise quickly and appropriately. For example, when day learners had concerns about college transport, managers ensured that learners felt comfortable with the arrangements for travelling to and from the college.

p.2

better?

Leaders, managers, staff and governors are not ambitious for what learners can achieve. They do not ensure that learners have high enough aspirations for their future. The curriculum lacks cohesion and structure. Learning activities are not sufficiently challenging to keep learners interested in what they are doing. Most activities are not planned in a logical order. Instead, they are a series of events that occupy learners’ time. Consequently, learners do not make the progress of which they are capable. 14 to 16 September 2021 Tutors do not identify learners’ starting points consistently and accurately to plan personalised learning. For example, in numeracy lessons, staff do not know what mathematical skills the learners already have or what skills they need to develop further. All learners complete the same learning. In music and singing sessions, staff are not sufficiently skilled to recognise that certain activities are overstimulating for

p.2

better?

learners. This results in a decline in the behaviour of learners with sensory needs.

p.3

better?

Tutors do not make effective use of assessment information to help them plan or review the curriculum. Assessment strategies lack rigour. They do not help tutors to make an accurate evaluation of what learners have learned or what additional learning they need to fill any gaps in their knowledge, skills and behaviour. In a few instances, tutors move learning on too quickly before checking learners’ understanding.

p.3

better?

Staff do not monitor learners’ progress and achievements consistently. Most learning targets are too generic. They focus on the completion of specific tasks rather than helping learners to develop the knowledge, skills and behaviours that they need for their future. As a result, most learners do not achieve their planned outcomes.

p.3

better?

Tutors and teaching assistants do not receive sufficiently comprehensive training on the craft of teaching. They do not understand how to teach learners who have specific diagnoses and complex needs. As a result, teaching staff do not have the skills that they need to help learners to overcome their barriers to learning relating to their learning difficulty and/or disability. Most tutors and teaching assistants have relevant subject knowledge for the areas in which they teach or support.

p.3

better?

Support for learners is not consistently effective. In a few instances, teaching assistants use appropriate strategies to manage behaviours. This helps to promote the participation of a few learners in learning for short periods of time. However, other learners are overly supported. They do not develop the independence that they need for their next steps.

p.3

better?

Attendance is high for the majority of learners. However, managers do not identify trends in absences to support those learners with poor attendance to attend more regularly. Leaders and staff do not ensure that learners who miss lessons catch up on their learning. There is no expectation for learners to reinforce or practise routinely the skills they learn at college when they are at home or in their residential accommodation.

p.3

better?

Careers information, advice and guidance are not effective. The guidance that learners receive does not directly link to their planned next steps or to what they are capable of achieving. It reinforces the low expectations that leaders and staff have of learners. For example, learners with more complex needs do not receive appropriate careers information. They do not undertake work experience placements that are available to their peers. Consequently, they do not develop the work-related skills, confidence and independence that they are capable of gaining.

p.3

better?

Tutors and teaching assistants do not include British values, promote equality or 14 to 16 September 2021 celebrate diversity sufficiently in lessons. They demonstrate a limited understanding of British values and their importance in helping learners to prepare for life in modern Britain. Staff are unable to articulate clearly how they support learners to be responsible citizens in the community. Consequently, too many learners are unaware of the wider world beyond the college environment or of opportunities in their local communities.

p.3

better?

Leaders, managers and governors do not have an accurate oversight of learners’ progress. Their self-assessment processes are underdeveloped and lack rigour. Leaders’ evaluation of the quality of the curriculum is too positive. All of the weaknesses identified in the previous inspection report remain. The newly appointed principal has recognised that there are weaknesses in the curriculum and safeguarding. However, she has not had sufficient time to implement any significant changes.

p.4

better?

A few more able learners develop their English and mathematical skills successfully over time. They can write simple sentences accurately and read and interpret information from a range of basic texts. These learners carry out simple calculations using whole numbers and identify information in simple charts and graphs.

p.4

better?

A very few of the more able learners develop skills for work that align with their intended job roles. Staff support these learners initially with on-site work experience placements, such as working in a reception area. These placements help learners to gain confidence and an understanding of workplace expectations in a supportive environment.

p.4

better?

Governance arrangements are not effective. Governors do not have the breadth of expertise required to understand or evaluate the quality and effectiveness of the education curriculum at the college. Consequently, they do not hold college leaders to account sufficiently to ensure that the curriculum is meeting learners’ needs.

p.4

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.4

Safeguarding

Leaders, managers, governors and staff do not ensure that they protect learners from potential harm while in the college and the community. Risk assessments are not sufficiently rigorous to demonstrate that learners are always safe during activities both on and off the site. Access to the main building and external access points to the estate are not secure.

p.4

Safeguarding

Leaders, managers and governors do not ensure that staff comply with health and safety requirements. For example, staff working in practical learning environments do not securely store hazardous materials, such as cleaning fluids. They do not complete standard safety checks, such as monitoring daily refrigerator and freezer temperatures. 14 to 16 September 2021 Staff do not monitor the content that a few learners view on their mobile phones. They trust what learners tell them they are watching. Inspectors identified that the firewall on classroom computers is ineffective. It does not protect learners from accessing inappropriate material, including that relating to radicalisation and extremism.

p.4

Safeguarding

Staff do not have sufficient expertise to apply appropriate strategies to manage frequent and challenging behavioural incidents involving learners. Too many staff are regularly injured as a result of learners’ behaviour. In incident debriefs, managers do not identify lessons learned or how staff can improve the future handling of heightened situations.

p.5

Safeguarding

Leaders carry out appropriate pre-employment safeguarding checks on staff.

p.5

What does the provider need to do to improve?

 Take urgent action to rectify swiftly the serious safeguarding concerns identified throughout the inspection.  Put in place an ambitious and inclusive curriculum that meets all learners’ needs, prepares them for adulthood, and promotes positive behaviours and high expectations.  Invest in the care and cleanliness of the campus to promote high standards and industry expectations.  Ensure that tutors assess learners’ starting points accurately and plan a personalised curriculum that includes appropriate and challenging targets.  Introduce a thorough process for assessing what learners know and can do, including their progress over time.  Improve and monitor learners’ attendance both at college and in lessons, and ensure that learners quickly catch up on any learning that they miss.  Provide opportunities for both day and residential learners to practise regularly and reinforce the skills that they learn at college.

p.5

What does the provider need to do to improve?

 Provide tutors and teaching assistants with high-quality and relevant training, including training in British values and equality and diversity, that helps them to teach and support learners with complex needs effectively.  Ensure that all learners receive relevant careers information, advice and guidance so that they can make well-informed decisions about their next steps, either independently or with support.  Improve the rigour and effectiveness of quality improvement processes to identify the strengths and weaknesses in the quality of education and rectify weaknesses swiftly.  Improve governance arrangements to ensure that all governors understand the requirements of an ambitious and inclusive curriculum and that leaders and managers are held to account fully for the quality of learners’ education and support. 14 to 16 September 2021

p.5

Provider details

Address Dilston Hall Corbridge Northumberland NE45 5RJ

p.6

Provider details

Website www.cambiangroup.com/specialist- education/our-colleges/cambian-dilston- college

p.6

Provider details

Provider type Independent specialist college

p.6

Provider details

Date of previous inspection 8 November 2017

p.6

Provider details

Main subcontractors None 14 to 16 September 2021

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspection team was assisted by the principal, as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous inspection report. The inspection was carried out using the further education and skills inspection handbook and took into account all relevant provision at the provider. Inspectors collected a wide range of evidence to inform judgements, including visiting learning sessions, scrutinising learners’ work, seeking the views of learners, staff and other stakeholders, and examining the provider’s documentation and records.

p.7

Inspection team

Suzanne Wainwright, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Rachel Angus Her Majesty’s Inspector Neil Clark Ofsted Inspector Angie Fisher Ofsted Inspector 14 to 16 September 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion