Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Wisewood Community Pre-School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
7 Oct 2021
- URN verified
EY376090
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- develop knowledge of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006, which includes a duty to make a referral to the Disclosure and Barring Service where a member of staff is dismissed (or would have been, if the person had not left the setting first) because they have harmed a child or put a child at risk of harm. p.1
- The provider has ensured management understand the procedures to follow if a staff member is dismissed, or would have been dismissed, for harming a child or putting them at risk of harm. p.1
- We found that the provider had failed to notify Ofsted of a prior significant event and changes to individuals who are partners in, or a director, secretary or other officer or members of its governing body, which are requirements of their registration. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 516
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 15 July 2021, the provider notified us about a significant event. The notification means that the provider met their legal responsibility as set out in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage to notify Ofsted of any significant event which is likely to affect the suitability of the early years provider or any person who cares for, or is in regular contact with, children on the premises to look after children.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 4 October 2021, we carried out a regulatory visit. We found that the provider had failed to notify Ofsted of a prior significant event and changes to individuals who are partners in, or a director, secretary or other officer or members of its governing body, which are requirements of their registration. We also found that the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We have issued actions for the provider to take. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n develop procedures to review the continued suitability of staff, including being aware of staff taking medication to ensure that there is no adverse effect from the medication on their ability to care for children
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure staff fully understand their roles and responsibilities, including reviewing their knowledge and understanding of the settings policies and procedures
p.1
Summary of outcome
n conduct supervisions of staff and management to review practice and offer relevant support, coaching and training to support continuous improvement
p.1
Summary of outcome
n develop knowledge of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006, which includes a duty to make a referral to the Disclosure and Barring Service where a member of staff is dismissed (or would have been, if the person had not left the setting first) because they have harmed a child or put a child at risk of harm.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 6, 11 and 15 October 2021, the provider responded to the actions set. We found that the provider had reviewed their procedures to assess the continued suitability of staff. They had decided on a clear programme of when supervisions would be undertaken. During these supervisions, the provider plans to review staff's understanding of the settings policies and procedures. The provider has ensured management understand the procedures to follow if a staff member is dismissed, or would have been dismissed, for harming a child or putting them at risk of harm.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion