Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 23 Sept 2021 · published 22 Oct 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Eve Morris

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    23 Sept 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Eve Morris

  • Postcode verified

    TF3 1FA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+48Positivemore positive than 78% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedhigh expectationseffectiveeffectivelypolitefeel safeclearsensitive
Criticismrequires improvementdeclined

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings545w+64
  • Leadership62w0
  • What needs to improve149w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
756
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 48
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
5
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 72%Leadership 8%What needs to improve 20%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Holly Rigby Headteacher The Telford Park School District Centre Stirchley Telford Shropshire TF3 1FA

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Telford Park School

Following my visit to your school on 23 September 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Telford Park School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Telford Park School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the ongoing impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Telford Park School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action in

order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Context

Since the last full inspection, there have been some significant changes to the structure of the pastoral team in the school. You have allocated a head of year and a student support officer to each year group. The number of pupils on the school’s roll has significantly increased since the previous full inspection.

p.1

Main findings

The work you and staff are doing is bringing about clear and rapid improvements. You have established a sense of pride in the school. This is shared by staff and pupils. There is a can-do attitude. Staff recognise the improvements they have made and are passionate about continuing the improvement journey.

p.2

Main findings

You have thought carefully about how to make sure pupils learn and remember essential knowledge in each subject. You have used this to inform developments in the delivery of the curriculum, including how well teachers check pupils’ understanding of prior learning. Pupils commented that the recall questions in each subject are helping them to remember their learning.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders prioritise reading. They have made sure that pupils read challenging and carefully chosen books. Adults read to pupils each day. Pupils like this as they get to read books which they would not have normally read. Pupils who need additional support to read are identified through effective assessment. This means they get the support they need.

p.2

Main findings

You have high expectations of what pupils can achieve. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) study the same curriculum as other pupils. Teachers adapt their teaching and/or the curriculum to ensure all pupils have the right support when they need it.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have worked effectively to improve pupils’ attitudes to school and learning. You are taking a more informed approach to behaviour. This has helped to promote consistency across the school. Staff think more carefully about their response to pupils’ behaviour because of the system in place. Pupils agree that behaviour has improved significantly since the previous inspection. The number of pupils excluded for a fixed term has declined since the last inspection.

p.2

Main findings

Attendance has also improved. The attendance of disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND has improved. The number of pupils who are regularly off school has decreased significantly.

p.2

Main findings

The school is calm and orderly throughout the day. Pupils are courteous and polite. Pupils with whom I spoke said the new pastoral system has helped them to have adults they can talk to, including about sensitive issues. They feel safe in school.

p.2

Additional support

Your work with the Community Academies Trust has helped to improve teaching and learning. Subject leaders have worked together with other trust schools to develop well- sequenced curriculum plans. You have had bespoke training from the trust that focused on your school priorities. This has helped to ensure consistency across the school. You have valued this support.

p.2

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you, senior leaders, pupils, and staff. I also met with the chair of the board of trustees and the multi-academy trust chief executive officer to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

I visited a range of lessons, accompanied by leaders, and looked at examples of curriculum planning. I checked the single central record and examined behaviour and attendance records.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Community Academies Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Telford and Wrekin. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion