Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Childminder in Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
20 Oct 2021
- URN verified
2504548
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 362
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 13 September 2021, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate with enforcement. The inspection report sets out the actions the provider was required to take to meet the requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 28 September and 11 October, we carried out regulatory visits to the provider. The focus of the visits was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised at their inspection.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We found that the childminder had improved the use of documentation to ensure this is easily accessible and accurate. This included a clear record of attendance for children and details of the adults caring for them. The childminder demonstrated how she has defined the role of her assistant and gained permission from parents for her assistant to be left in sole charge of children for periods of up to two hours. The childminder and her assistant have introduced a key person system, to help ensure children are supervised adequately at all times. The childminder was able to provide certificates that confirm she has attended paediatric first aid training to
p.1
Summary of outcome
help ensure she can support a child if they are injured or unwell in her care. We found that the childminder and her assistant had improved their knowledge and understanding of child protection procedures and now fully understand their responsibilities.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements. We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion