Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
20 Aug 2021
- URN verified
305090
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 295
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 18%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the 'Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage', which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 4 August 2021, we received information that the provider was not meeting some of these requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 6 August 2021, we carried out a regulatory visit. During the visit, we found the premises were, in the main, safe and suitable for children. Parts of the external building were seen to be weathered. These areas were not accessible to the children and the provider had already arranged for necessary repairs to be carried out. However, during the visit, we identified some minor hazards to children, which had not been identified by the provider or staff. There was some debris in the outdoor play area; anti-bacterial cleaners were accessible to children; and a drainpipe in the outdoor play area was overflowing. These hazards posed a small element of risk to children's safety. As a result, we raised an action for the provider to take. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this matter.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n take all reasonable steps to ensure that children are not exposed to risks by implementing effective risk assessment procedures.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare action raised.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion