Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Amber Lodge

Inspected 8 Sept 2021 · published 8 Oct 2021 · URN 1239886

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Amber Family Ltd

  • Inspection date verified

    8 Sept 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Charlie Bamber, Marie Cordingley

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Amber Lodge

  • URN verified

    1239886

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementRI to be good

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−5Mixedmore positive than 9% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositivemake good progresseffectivesafewell supportedenjoystrengthsclear
Criticismnot alwaysseriouspoorerrorsrequires improvementunclearnot clearnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1149w−6
  • What needs to improve679w+11

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,827
about usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 43
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%What needs to improve 31%About the inspection 15%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential family centre: Amber Lodge 1 Amber Lodge Amber Family Ltd Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

This residential family centre provides care and accommodation for four families. The centre provides residential assessments that assist local authorities and courts in making decisions which promote the welfare of children.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and parents, taking into account good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

How well children and parents are helped and protected good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

The residential family centre provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Date of previous inspection: 16 August 2017

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Overall judgement at last inspection: good

p.1

Enforcement action since last inspection:

A monitoring visit took place 19 November 2019 in response to poor safeguarding practice following a serious incident at the residential family centre. Two compliance notices were issued under Regulations 8 and 12 of The Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002. A further monitoring visit took place on 18 December 2019. The compliance notices were deemed to have been met following this visit and no further enforcement action has been taken since this time. Inspection report for residential family centre: Amber Lodge 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

On a day-to-day basis, families have positive experiences while they live in the centre. The environment is welcoming, calm and relaxed. Families present as being comfortable in the centre and at ease with staff. This supports them to make the best use of their time there, while they are being assessed.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Support is provided for parents to make good progress in respect of their parenting skills. Staff genuinely care and want the best outcomes for each family. Direct work and relevant education help parents to understand what their children need and what they need to do to be a good parent. Parents feel that they are making progress. They enjoy having access to activities such as baby massage and baby yoga.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Parenting assessments are of a good standard. Weekly summaries are produced. This helps parents understand their strengths and areas for development. It also helps them to understand and engage in the assessment process. Final assessments have clear outcomes and recommendations. These are in line with the findings throughout the assessment process.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Support and supervision in taking medication is provided where necessary. On one occasion, a parent was not supported in time to order repeat medication. This meant her health needs were not fully met. Errors in recording medication mean that medication administration records are unclear.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Internal placement plans do not fully capture the holistic needs of the family. Nor do they include relevant information from the placing authority, or the intended outcomes of the placement. A requirement is made to reflect this shortfall.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Parents do not always feel fully able to express themselves or their views. One parent reported she had additional learning needs. It was not clear how staff were ensuring that she understood the things communicated to her. Residents’ meetings do not capture parents’ views, wishes and feelings well. The quality of care review also does not embody parents’ feedback. Strengthening these areas would ensure that parents felt listened to and knew that their views, wishes and feelings were important.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

A number of requirements are made which come under the overall progress and experience area. However, this does not detract from the overall positive and beneficial experience parents have while living in the centre for assessment.

p.2

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Risks for parents and children are identified by the placing authority at the pre- placement stage. These risks then populate the centre’s own risk assessments. Risk Inspection report for residential family centre: Amber Lodge 3 assessments identify strategies for reducing and managing risks. The quality of the centre’s risk assessments is good.

p.2

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Risks identified at the point of placement are matched against the risks posed by the families already living there. More in-depth analysis of how risks may have an impact on each family would be beneficial. This would make clearer the matching and risk management process.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Most parents make good progress in relation to risk reduction. The centre uses a red, amber and green risk rating system called a ‘heatmap’. This clearly illustrates the rate at which risks are reducing (or increasing, should this be the case).

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

There is a clear focus on safeguarding running throughout the centre’s operation. Staff observe day-to-day parenting tasks to ensure these are performed safely. Training and education for parents around areas of risk such as co-sleeping, shaken baby syndrome and domestic violence have a positive impact. One parent specifically commented how one piece of work he had done had changed his understanding and behaviour.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Parents are encouraged to get along with each other and avoid conflict. Staff employ effective strategies to manage and diffuse any tensions that arise between families.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Safe recruitment practice is not always followed. Recruitment records are difficult to understand. Managers are not fully appraised of all recruitment checks prior to a member of staff starting to work in the centre. This does not ensure that all staff employed are safe and suitable to work with children and vulnerable adults.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

The manager demonstrated good knowledge and understanding of the families’ individual risks. Her knowledge of the allegations process, however, was less well developed and requires some improvement. Other managers across the company are supporting the manager who is relatively new to the role.

p.3

good

There have been three managers at this centre since the last inspection. The current registered manager is not working here and has not yet cancelled her registration. An acting manager is in post who has yet to apply for registration. There are some shortfalls identified in the leadership and management of the centre. None of these are serious or widespread or have a significant effect on the experiences of the families who access the centre.

p.3

good

Systems for monitoring the quality of care are not fully embedded. For example, some documents had not been reviewed or scrutinised for errors, and families are not routinely consulted about their views about the running of the centre. Reports under regulation 25 have not been submitted to the regulator every month and visits have not always taken place. This hinders the regulator as well as the manager in monitoring the service. Inspection report for residential family centre: Amber Lodge 4 Staff supervision does not always occur with sufficient frequency to evidence that staff are well supported. This is particularly true with staff who are new to the centre and who may only receive supervision every three months.

p.3

good

Local authority placement and care plans, looked after child reviews, placement planning meetings and the court letter of instruction are not held on file for any of the families. These are important documents which should guide the direct work and assessment of families.

p.4

good

More positively, those staff who were spoken to felt well supported. They said that staff morale was high and that they feel valued for the work they do. This helps to retain staff who are skilled and experienced. Staff have good development opportunities within the service and further learning and qualifications are supported and encouraged. Inspection report for residential family centre: Amber Lodge 5

p.4

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.5

Requirement Due date

The registered person shall ensure that all persons employed by him receive appropriate training, supervision and appraisal. (Regulation 17 (5)(a)) 19 October 2021

p.5

Requirement Due date

The registered person shall make arrangements for the recording, handling, safe keeping, safe administration and disposal of medicines received into the residential family centre. (Regulation 11 (2)) 19 October 2021

p.5

Requirement Due date

The registered person shall, before providing a family with accommodation in the residential family centre, or if that is not reasonably practicable, as soon as possible thereafter, draw up in consultation with the placing authority a written plan (in these Regulations referred to as "the placement plan") setting out, in particular—

p.5

Requirement Due date

the facilities and services to be provided during the course of the placement;

p.5

Requirement Due date

the objectives and intended outcome of the placement;

p.5

Requirement Due date

an assessment of the risks, if any, which a resident at the residential family centre may present to their own health, safety and welfare or that of other residents or staff at the centre.

p.5

Requirement Due date

In preparing or reviewing the placement plan the registered person shall, so far as practicable—

p.5

Requirement Due date

seek and take account of the views of the members of the family;

p.5

Requirement Due date

take account of any relevant assessment or other report relating to any member of the family which may be provided by the placing authority. (Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b)(c) (3(a))(b)) 19 October 2021 Inspection report for residential family centre: Amber Lodge 6 The registered person shall not—

p.5

Requirement Due date

employ a person to work at the residential family centre unless that person is fit to work at a residential family centre; or

p.6

Requirement Due date

allow a person to whom paragraph (2) applies, to work at the residential family centre unless that person is fit to work at a residential family centre.

p.6

Requirement Due date

For the purposes of paragraph (1), a person is not fit to work at a residential family centre unless—

p.6

Requirement Due date

full and satisfactory information is available in relation to him in respect of each of the matters specified in Schedule 2. (Regulation 16 (1)(a)(b) (3)(d))

p.6

Requirement Due date

In particular, that no person should start work, shadow shifts or induction training in the centre until the organisation is in receipt of all relevant recruitment checks. 19 October 2021

p.6

Requirement Due date

Where the registered provider is an organisation or a partnership, the residential family centre shall be visited in accordance with this regulation by—

p.6

Requirement Due date

the responsible individual or one of the partners, as the case may be;

p.6

Requirement Due date

another of the directors or other persons responsible for the management of the organisation or partnership; or

p.6

Requirement Due date

an employee of the organisation or partnership who is not directly concerned with the conduct of the residential family centre.

p.6

Requirement Due date

Visits under paragraph (1) or (2) shall take place at least once a month and may be unannounced. (Regulation 25 (2)(a)(b)(c) (3)) 19 October 2021

p.6

Requirement Due date

The registered person shall maintain in respect of each family accommodated in the residential family centre a record which—

p.6

Requirement Due date

includes the information, documents and other records specified in Schedule 3 relating to members of the family. (Regulation 19 (1)(a)) 19 October 2021 Inspection report for residential family centre: Amber Lodge 7 In particular, the records should include placing authority looked after children documents including care and placement plans, statutory meeting minutes, and the terms of any court order under which the family is provided with accommodation at the residential family centre.

p.6

Requirement Due date

The registered person shall establish and maintain a system for—

p.7

Requirement Due date

improving the quality of care provided at the residential family centre.

p.7

Requirement Due date

The system referred to in paragraph (1) shall provide for consultation with residents. (Regulation 23 (1)(a)(b) (3)) 19 October 2021

p.7

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure that placements take into account any disability or special needs. (Residential Family Centres National Minimum Standards, page 10, paragraph 3.1) In particular, where parents express difficulties with communication, reading and writing a detailed plan is implemented to assist them and to ensure that they understand all communications and expectations.

p.7

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and parents using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential family centre: Amber Lodge 8

p.7

Residential family centre details

Registered provider address: K A Farr & Co Chartered Accountants, 6-8 Botanic Road, Southport, Lancashire PR9 7NG

p.8

Inspectors

Charlie Bamber, Social Care Inspector Marie Cordingley, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential family centre: Amber Lodge 9 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion