Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Stockton SCITT

Inspected 14 Jun 2021 · published 6 Oct 2021 · URN 70245

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Fiona Manuel (lead), Marcus Newby

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Jun 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Fiona Manuel, Marcus Newby

  • Postcode verified

    TS19 0QD

  • Name on report verified

    Stockton-on-Tees Teacher Training Partnership

  • URN verified

    70245

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+90Very positivemore positive than 93% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseambitiousstrongclearoutstandingwell preparedeffectivehigh-qualitytimely

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
887
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
11 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 59%About the inspection 41%

Full report text

Stockton-on-Tees Teacher Training Partnership The Education Centre @ SSFC, Bishopton Road West, Stockton-on-Tees TS19 0QD

p.1

Inspection judgements

Primary and secondary age-phase combined

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education and training Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE partnership?

Trainees benefit from an ambitious initial teacher education (ITE) curriculum. Leaders weave core ideas, the golden threads, throughout the training programme. Leaders ensure that mentors reinforce centre-based training. The overwhelming majority of trainees value the support of course leaders and mentors.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE partnership?

Trainees acquire the knowledge and skills to teach in their respective phases. Primary- phase trainees benefit from a thorough introduction to foundation subjects. They are taught the importance of a systematic synthetic phonics programme. There remains variance in how some schools supplement this training. In the secondary phase, trainees develop increasing expertise in their subjects. They value the additional insights provided by subject leaders. While trainees could learn more about the traditions behind their subjects, they remain well trained to teach them.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE partnership?

Trainees are well prepared for the classroom. Through focused training and ongoing feedback, they become increasingly adept at managing behaviour. Trainees carry out research that helps them meet the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). They are taught about their safeguarding responsibilities.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE partnership?

Trainees benefit from strong systems of communication between programme leaders and mentors. Programme leaders are quick to address any issues that arise. Senior leaders ensure that trainees’ views are heard and acted on. Leaders are providing additional support in response to the challenges some trainees have experienced this year.

p.1

Information about this ITE partnership

◼ There are currently 55 trainees in the partnership. ◼ The partnership equips trainees to teach in the primary phase and the secondary phase. ◼ The majority of placement schools are in the Stockton area. A small number of placements are offered in schools in other local authority areas. ◼ The partnership offers qualified teacher status (QTS) with a Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE). Sheffield Hallam University is the awarding body for the PGCE part of the course. The partnership offers provision for trainees following the teacher apprenticeship pathway. ◼ The partnership works with 39 schools. Trainees are currently placed in 38 of those schools.

p.2

Information about this inspection

◼ The inspection team consisted of three of Her Majesty’s Inspectors (HMI). ◼ Inspectors spoke with the partnership manager, the deputy partnership manager and an administrative coordinator. Inspectors met the chair of the strategic management board. Members of the inspection team spoke with 22 mentors, five subject leaders and four school-based coordinators. The team met three professional tutors. Inspectors carried out a remote meeting with two representatives from the PGCE partner, Sheffield Hallam University. ◼ Inspectors spoke to nine trainees during placement setting visits and an additional 16 trainees in meetings. ◼ Inspectors held remote conversations with two early career teachers and two recently qualified teachers who had been trained by the partnership. ◼ Inspectors carried out five focused reviews. In the primary phase, inspectors explored early reading, mathematics and foundation subjects. In the secondary phase,

p.2

Information about this inspection

inspectors explored English and geography. ◼ Inspectors visited six placement settings.

p.2

better?

Leaders provide an ambitious curriculum. The curriculum is delivered through a clear, school-based development plan. Centre-based training is carefully aligned with trainees’ learning in their placement schools. Leaders map the curriculum out to enable trainees to meet the relevant professional standards. Leaders give a strong focus to subject knowledge. Primary-phase trainees acquire good knowledge of foundation subjects. Secondary-phase trainees learn the substantive knowledge that pupils need to acquire. The secondary-phase English curriculum helps trainees to teach poetry and Shakespeare. Trainees learn less about the traditions behind their subjects, such as different models of the English curriculum.

p.2

better?

The partnership complies with the core content framework. For example, trainees understand how pupils learn. They develop plans that help pupils to build knowledge over time. Trainees develop strategies to help pupils remember important knowledge. The programme teaches trainees about safeguarding and well-being issues. Trainees learn the importance of professional behaviours. They are well prepared for their early career teacher year by the end of the course.

p.3

better?

Expert colleagues provide a clear focus on early reading. This is introduced from the start of the course. Trainees receive clear insights into systematic synthetic phonics and its central role in helping children to decode. In some schools, centre-based phonics training is not reinforced fully.

p.3

better?

Leaders cultivate high-quality partnership work. The partnership steering group enables all partners to contribute to the ITE curriculum. Centre-based training sets a purposeful context for school-based learning. The partnership’s PGCE modules enable trainees to use research to inform their observations and professional practice.

p.3

better?

Trainees benefit from effective mentoring. All mentors attend centre-based training. Their weekly reviews of trainees’ progress are checked by programme leaders. Programme leaders are quick to intervene where issues occur. Leaders listen and respond to trainees’ views on training and mentoring.

p.3

better?

Leaders provide effective assessment practices. Trainees’ progress against the curriculum is reviewed in weekly meetings with their mentors. Leaders provide a series of formal review points to check how well trainees are learning the intended curriculum. Professional tutors provide external checks on trainees’ learning.

p.3

better?

Leaders commission support from local authority experts. This supports the teaching of early reading and mathematics. Expert teaching and resources support the teaching of foundation subjects. Secondary-phase subject leaders provide trainees with appropriate subject knowledge. Specialists deliver specific sessions to help trainees meet the needs of pupils with SEND. Leaders have a clear awareness of the knowledge and skills that trainees need to acquire.

p.3

better?

Programme leaders have developed considered selection procedures. They provide timely pastoral support. Despite this, an increased number of trainees in the primary phase have withdrawn from the programme this year. Leaders are refining their analysis of trainees’ needs to further customise support for trainees in the future.

p.3

(Information for the partnership and appropriate authority)

Expert colleagues provide a clear focus on early reading. Trainees are taught the importance of a systematic synthetic phonics programme as part of their training. In some cases, this training is not fully reinforced in placement schools. This is in part due to schools reviewing their practice in response to Department for Education (DfE) guidance. Leaders need to work closely with schools so that centre-based training is fully reinforced. Trainees receive good training on the knowledge and skills pupils need to acquire in the subjects trainees teach. In some cases, trainees receive less insight into the traditions and debates surrounding the curriculum in those subjects. Leaders should explore how they can further enhance trainees’ subject knowledge in this area. Despite thoughtful recruitment and pastoral support, an increased number of primary- phase trainees have withdrawn from the programme this year. Leaders should continue to

p.4

(Information for the partnership and appropriate authority)

refine their analysis of trainees’ need to further support trainees with the training programme.

p.4

the ITE compliance criteria?

◼ The partnership meets the DfE statutory compliance criteria.

p.4

ITE partnership details

Unique reference number 70245 Inspection number 10166731

p.5

ITE partnership details

This inspection was carried out by Her Majesty’s Inspectors (HMI) in accordance with the ‘Initial teacher education inspection framework and handbook’. This handbook sets out the statutory basis and framework for initial teacher education (ITE) inspections in England from September 2020.

p.5

ITE partnership details

Type of ITE partnership SCITT Phases provided Primary Secondary Date of previous inspection 47 February 2013

p.5

Inspection team

Malcolm Kirtley, Overall lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Fiona Manuel Her Majesty’s Inspector Marcus Newby Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.5

Annex: Partnership schools

From the full list of partnership schools, inspectors contacted trainees and staff at the following schools, as part of this inspection

p.6

grade

Dyke House Sports and Technology College 139405 Secondary September Good

p.6

grade

Hardwick Green Primary Academy 139392 Primary September Good

p.6

grade

Ingleby Mill Primary School 130256 Primary September Good

p.6

grade

Northfield School and Sports College 111731 Secondary September Good

p.6

grade

Rosebrook Primary School 143145 Primary September Good

p.6

grade

Saint Mark’s Church of England Primary School 144551 Primary September No current grade guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

grade

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-

p.7

grade

government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

grade

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

grade

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion