Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 13 Jul 2021 · published 4 Oct 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Adam Vincent

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    13 Jul 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Adam Vincent

  • Postcode verified

    IG11 0LG

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−7Mixedmore positive than 12% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseenjoywell sequencedwell-plannedrobustsuccessfullypositiveeffectivelyimproving
Criticismgapspoorweaknessesrequires improvementfall behinddelaynot clearnot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings858w−7
  • What needs to improve191w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,046
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 18%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Rachel Anthony Headteacher Thames View Junior School Samuel Ferguson Place Bastable Avenue Barking Essex IG11 0LG

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 13 July 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school received a judgement of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure that curriculum plans identify the key knowledge that leaders want pupils to learn in each subject  strengthen teachers’ subject knowledge across the curriculum  further develop approaches to support pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) so that all pupils can access the full curriculum.

p.2

Context

Since the previous inspection, there have been several changes to the teaching and support staff teams. Leaders have restructured staffing across the school.

p.2

Context

You were appointed as headteacher in 2019 from your previous position as head of school. All other previous members of the senior leadership team have left the school and a new senior leadership team is now in place. A member of staff from the Partnership Learning Trust has joined the school as executive principal.

p.2

Context

Leaders have employed a new special educational needs coordinator. They have supported this member of staff to ensure that he is fully qualified for the role.

p.2

Context

A new chair of the local governing body was elected in July 2021. She is an experienced member of the governing body.

p.2

Main findings

School leaders and members of the multi-academy trust have taken robust action to improve the school. These actions are successfully tackling the areas for improvement that were identified in the previous inspection.

p.2

Main findings

While the COVID-19 restrictions have slowed some of your plans for improvement, you and your team have not used this as a reason to delay making the changes that were needed at the school.

p.2

Main findings

When pupils returned after the national lockdowns, teachers checked what pupils had remembered and what they had forgotten. They used this information to refine subject planning. For example, teachers noted that pupils had forgotten aspects of practical science, so they made sure to provide more opportunities for pupils to revisit their understanding.

p.2

Main findings

You have introduced a new curriculum. Subjects are taught through a thematic approach. This means that pupils learn each theme over several weeks. The themes include subjects such as geography and science. Even though teachers plan activities that pupils enjoy, sometimes teachers are not clear about what they want pupils to know in each subject. Leaders have not considered carefully the subject content within each theme, including the essential knowledge they expect pupils to learn and understand.

p.2

Main findings

You have invested in staff training. This is starting to make a positive difference to how well staff understand the curriculum. Nevertheless, more work needs to be done to ensure that teachers develop their subject-specific knowledge. Some teachers need this additional support to teach all subjects effectively.

p.3

Main findings

Plans for mathematics and English are well sequenced. Leaders know where there are gaps in pupils’ knowledge and understanding. When pupils returned from the periods of partial school closure, you quickly identified where gaps in pupils’ understanding were. You have adapted these subjects so that gaps in knowledge are addressed. For example, teachers found that some pupils in Years 4 and 5 struggled with fractions. Teachers broke this concept down into smaller steps and went back over multiplication and division to strengthen pupils’ understanding.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders have introduced a structured and well-planned system for teaching reading. When pupils join the school, their phonics knowledge is assessed carefully. Pupils who fall behind are given focused teaching to support their reading. Pupils enjoy reading and discuss their favourite books and authors.

p.3

Main findings

Leadership of the provision for pupils with SEND is improving, which in turn is leading to better support for these pupils. However, in some cases, pupils with SEND are not supported effectively to access the full curriculum and learn the same subject content as their peers. Following the COVID-19 restrictions, leaders have focused on ensuring that pupils are able to access support available from outside agencies, such as speech and language therapy, to meet their needs.

p.3

Main findings

You have also been working on improving behaviour in the school. You have introduced new routines and clarified your expectations. Teachers and support staff use the same approach to deal with any poor behaviour. This means that pupils understand what is expected of them. Pupils behave sensibly inside lessons and around the school.

p.3

Additional support

An executive principal has joined the school from the trust. She has been supporting you and other leaders to carry out the plans for school improvement.

p.3

Additional support

The local authority has checked leaders’ evaluation of the school’s work. Local authority officers know the strengths and weaknesses of the school. They understand the barriers that leaders face and have worked with you to overcome them.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with you and the executive principal. I also met with other leaders, staff and pupils. Meetings were also held with a representative of the local authority and a representative of those responsible for governance to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.4

Evidence

I visited lessons, listened to pupils read, spoke with staff and pupils and looked at examples of pupils’ work. I looked at documents and the outcomes of leaders’ monitoring activities.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the chief executive officer of the Partnership Learning Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Barking and Dagenham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion