Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Zarina Connolly (lead), Alyson Middlemass

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alyson Middlemass, Zarina Connolly

  • Postcode verified

    M23 9BP

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+27Mostly positivemore positive than 62% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelypositiveambitiouseffectiveloveproudsecureimproving
Criticismweaknesseslacktoo manynot secure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings154w0
  • Leadership1171w+27

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,324
about usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 8
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 11%Leadership 86%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Kevin Green Principal Manchester Health Academy Moor Road Wythenshawe Greater Manchester M23 9BP

p.1

Academy

Following my visit with Zarina Connolly, Ofsted Inspector (OI), Osama Abdul Rahim, OI, and David Woodhouse, OI to your school on 14 and 15 July 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the school's most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Academy

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in March 2020. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Academy

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. We discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in our evaluation of the school.

p.1

Academy

Having considered all the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and managers are taking effective actions towards the removal of

The trust's statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.1

Leaders and managers are taking effective actions towards the removal of

The school's improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.1

PROTECT-INSPECTION

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the chair of the local governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Manchester. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.2

Context

Since the previous section 5 inspection, there has been a considerable number of changes to the senior leadership team. Six new assistant principals have been appointed. This includes an assistant principal with responsibility for special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Several new teaching staff have joined the school. This includes five lead practitioners across a range of subjects, one curriculum leader, and three subject leaders.

p.3

Context

The board of trustees has appointed a new chair of the local governing body (LGB) who began this role in April 2021. In addition, one further governor has also been appointed to the LGB.

p.3

Context

Year 11 pupils left the school at the end of May 2021.

p.3

designation

Following the most recent section 5 inspection, governors have taken effective steps to strengthen the school’s senior leadership team. This has provided much needed stability for pupils and staff. It has also ensured that, collectively, senior leaders have the appropriate expertise to secure further improvements to the quality of education for pupils. Leaders have a suitable improvement plan in place. However, the success criteria identified to measure the impact of leaders’ actions lack precision. Senior leaders, subject leaders and lead practitioners are beginning to raise the expectations that teachers have of pupils.

p.3

designation

Governors are beginning to strengthen their oversight of leaders’ work to improve the school. Recently, they have revised their approach to holding leaders to account. They have introduced appropriate systems to check on leaders’ progress towards the key areas for improvement. Governors use the information that they glean from the new systems to ask more probing questions about the effectiveness of subject curriculums. That said, governors do not have a secure enough understanding of pupils’ attendance or how well those pupils with SEND get the support that they need to access subject curriculums.

p.3

designation

Senior leaders afford teachers several opportunities to benefit from curriculum development training. Leaders also provide time for teachers to work together with subject leaders. These actions are helping to ensure that teachers are suitably well informed about how to construct ambitious subject curriculums. Teachers now give greater consideration in their planning to the essential knowledge that pupils need to learn and the order in which concepts should be taught. This means that subject curriculum plans are increasingly well-thought-out. Now that curriculum plans are in place, leaders are beginning to instigate support for teachers so that they can

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

deliver these plans effectively. However, there remain weaknesses in how well teachers adapt these plans to meet the needs of those pupils with SEND.

p.4

PROTECT-INSPECTION

In most subjects, teachers have developed subject-specific resources to support them to deliver the curriculum. Teachers use these materials to help pupils identify the most important vocabulary and knowledge that they must know and remember. Pupils told inspectors that they appreciate and value these resources. However, in some instances, these resources make it difficult for some pupils to fully demonstrate their understanding of the taught curriculum. This is particularly the case for those pupils with SEND. Leaders and teachers are not complacent. They regularly review and amend these subject resources so that they better meet pupils’ needs.

p.4

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Senior leaders have acted appropriately to overhaul the processes that teachers use to check on how well pupils are learning the curriculum. Leaders are beginning to make better use of the information that they obtain from these checks to amend curriculum plans. That said, there remain some differences in how effectively teachers use assessment during learning to address pupils’ misconceptions and overcome pupils’ missing knowledge. This means that some pupils do not learn the curriculum in the way that leaders intend.

p.4

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Senior leaders and governors have secured improvements to the leadership of SEND with the appointment of a new special educational needs coordinator. This has led to greater precision in identifying the needs of pupils with SEND. Leaders have also started to improve the quality of information available to teachers about this group of pupils.

p.4

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Leaders continue to prioritise their strategy to support pupils with reading. They have plans in place to improve staff’s effectiveness in identifying weaknesses in pupils’ phonics knowledge and reading. Leaders have strengthened staff’s expertise in phonics with the appointment of new staff. Teachers recognise the importance of improving pupils’ knowledge of vocabulary. To this end, leaders plan to train more teachers in vocabulary development and phonics teaching. Pupils continue to benefit from leaders’ strategies to encourage a love of reading across the school.

p.4

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Leaders have worked well to improve pupils’ rates of attendance. Through the appointment of additional attendance officers, leaders have strengthened the attendance team. This is starting to have a positive impact on the proportion of pupils who attend school regularly. While there are several success stories for individual pupils, too many others do not attend school as often as they should. This is particularly the case for pupils with SEND. This has been exacerbated by the issues caused by COVID-19.

p.4

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Since Year 11 left the school at the end of May 2021, staff have continued to provide this group of pupils with online study materials and other resources. This

p.4

PROTECT-INSPECTION

has helped to prepare and support pupils in Year 11 for the next stage of their education, employment, or training.

p.5

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Staff are proud to work at the school. They are positive about the opportunities that leaders provide for their professional development. Most staff feel that leaders have put in place appropriate measures to help staff to manage their workload effectively. Most staff feel that leaders support them well.

p.5

Additional support

Senior leaders value the support they have received from a new school improvement adviser provided by the local authority. Subject leaders are highly positive about how this support is helping them to develop and improve the design and order of subject curriculum plans.

p.5

Evidence

During the inspection, inspectors met with the principal, other senior leaders, teachers, and members of the support staff. The lead inspector met with the chair of the board of trustees and the chair of the LGB. The lead inspector also spoke with a representative of the local authority on the telephone.

p.5

Evidence

Inspectors visited a range of lessons in English, art, ethics, geography, history, photography, science and Spanish. Inspectors reviewed wider samples of pupils’ work and met with pupils from Years 7, 8, 9 and 10 to talk about their learning and other aspects of school life.

p.5

Evidence

Inspectors considered a variety of documentation, including leaders’ improvement plans, subject leaders’ curriculum plans and other documentation relating to the curriculum. Inspectors analysed leaders’ records linked to safeguarding and attendance. Inspectors considered the 72 responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including the 70 comments submitted via the free-text facility. Inspectors also reviewed the 56 responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion