Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 13 Jul 2021 · published 29 Sept 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stefanie Lipinski-Barltrop

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    13 Jul 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Stefanie Lipinski-Barltrop

  • Postcode verified

    CB21 4JB

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−5Mixedmore positive than 14% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrongconsistentlyimprovingwell supportedimprovedfeel saferigorous
Criticismconcernsnot yetnot alwayspoorrequires improvementdisruptionconcernnot consistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1064w−16
  • What needs to improve159w+60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,221
longer than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 87%What needs to improve 13%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Helena Marsh Principal Linton Village College Cambridge Road Linton Cambridge Cambridgeshire CB21 4JB

p.1

College

Following my visit to your school on 13 July 2021 with Damian Loneragan, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

College

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received a judgement of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspection.

p.1

College

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

College

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school. The school should take further action to ensure that leaders:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 embed the new curriculum plans and recent improvements to special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) practice to provide a consistently strong quality of education for all pupils across all year groups  strengthen communication with parents so that they fully understand leaders’ plans for improving the school.

p.2

Context

Linton Village College joined a new multi-academy trust, Anglian Learning, on 1 April 2020. Two new assistant principals, a new director of inclusion and three new subject leaders were appointed in September 2020. A new chair of the local governing body and a new chair of the standards committee were appointed in January 2021.

p.2

Context

The disbanding of the Chilford Hundred Education Trust, and the college’s teaching school, CASSA (the Cambridge & Suffolk Schools Alliance) and associated initiatives have enabled the college’s senior leadership team to focus on school operations and improvements.

p.2

Main findings

The impact of leaders and managers at all levels continues to improve. They are realistic about what still needs to be done. There is a determined approach to building sustainable foundations for the longer term.

p.2

Main findings

Middle leaders are increasingly effective and feel that they have made ‘huge strides forward’. They are well supported by senior leaders. Leaders have thought carefully about the important knowledge that pupils should learn in each of the subject areas and the order in which to teach it. Pupils told us they understood the new knowledge taught in lessons. Pupils could articulate what they were learning and why. They used subject vocabulary well in English and religious studies to explain key concepts. Although improvement is evident, the planned curriculum is not yet delivered consistently across all subject areas.

p.2

Main findings

Provision for pupils with SEND has improved. The special educational needs coordinator provides useful information for teachers, which they include in their planning. The use of learning support assistants to support pupils with SEND is now more effective and consistent. While the communication with parents of pupils with SEND is improving, there is still more work to do. Many strategies are new and have not yet had time to embed.

p.2

Main findings

We spoke with pupils, in all year groups, during the inspection. Almost all told us that they feel safe in the school. Pupils said that bullying was rare and that if it did happen, they would trust staff to sort out their issues. One pupil’s view, that the school ‘is really inclusive and welcoming,’ was representative of others.

p.2

Main findings

School leaders have recently reviewed the school’s behaviour policy and have taken action to increase the consistency with which staff respond to poor behaviour. Pupils say some low-level disruption of lessons remains, but its occurrence is reducing. On the day of the inspection, pupils conducted themselves well in lessons and around the school site.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders have raised the profile of the importance of personal, social and health education (PSHE). Staff are trained well to teach the subject. Pupils say PSHE has helped them understand about relationships, British values and how they can promote their mental and physical well-being. Pupils have access to counselling and other external support agencies. Leaders have consulted with parents about the relationships, sex and health education curriculum and have taken into consideration their feedback.

p.3

Main findings

Pupils learn about their rights and responsibilities in society. They talk about how, in their school, they accept everyone for who they are. Pupils are taught that sexual violence and sexual harassment are not acceptable. They told us they would share any concerns they have with an adult in the school.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders use the safeguarding guidance appropriately. Staff are vigilant at spotting and identifying issues of concern. When concerns are reported to adults, they are recorded suitably. The system for staff to report concerns is thorough. Records are detailed. Leaders review how well they are safeguarding pupils and involve the right statutory agencies at the right time. They have recently reviewed their processes to ensure that they also involve families, where appropriate, at the earliest opportunity.

p.3

Main findings

Governors are determined to provide pupils with the best quality education and care. They know the school well and focus on those areas that need to improve. Governors are now providing more rigorous and searching challenge on the impact of school leaders’ decisions.

p.3

Main findings

Staff are proud to work at the school. They speak positively about the training that they receive from leaders. Most say leaders are considerate of their well-being. They say leaders do help when staff workload is high but do not always consider ‘pinch points’ in workload. While a number of parents are supportive, leaders have not yet gained the full support of parents in what they are trying to achieve. Some parents do not always understand leaders’ intentions. Some parents feel that communication regarding school improvement could be better.

p.3

Additional support

The trust’s support and challenge have been central in helping senior leaders to focus on school improvement. The school has built partnerships with other secondary schools in the trust to share best practice. Membership of trust-wide leadership networks has created opportunities for peer learning and professional development. There is still more to do in order to improve the school. Nonetheless, focused leadership from the top is starting to transform the school for the better.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, we held meetings with the principal, other senior leaders, middle leaders, the deputy chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, pupils, staff and representatives of those responsible for governance to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I held a telephone conversation with a representative of the local authority.

p.4

Evidence

We walked around the school with a senior leader to view how effectively leaders promote good behaviour and carried out visits to lessons. We looked at the safeguarding and child protection policies, improvement plans and leaders’ self- evaluation, alongside other information.

p.4

Evidence

We considered 389 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View. We also considered 70 free-text responses, 81 staff questionnaire responses and one telephone conversation with a parent.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the chief executive officer of the Anglian Learning multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Cambridgeshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion