Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
1 Jul 2021
- Inspectorssingle source
Lisa Strong
- Postcode verified
RM10 7UR
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Following my visit to your school on 1 July 2021 with Aliki Constantopoulou, Her Majesty’s Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. p.1
- Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection. p.1
- The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received three successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections. p.1
- This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. p.1
- I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation. p.1
- Since the additional remote monitoring inspection in February 2021, further changes have been made to the governing body. p.2
- Currently, there are two acting co-chairs of governors. p.2
- A new chair and vice-chair will be elected in September. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance11
“Systems for behaviour management are clear.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 925
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Paul Campbell Executive Headteacher Eastbrook School Dagenham Road Dagenham Essex RM10 7UR
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Eastbrook School
Following my visit to your school on 1 July 2021 with Aliki Constantopoulou, Her Majesty’s Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Eastbrook School
The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received three successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Eastbrook School
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Eastbrook School
Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
in order for the school to become a good school. The school should take further action to:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
develop the sequencing of the primary curriculum in geography and history so that the key concepts are clear and are revisited, to help pupils remember more and make connections between topics develop secondary pupils’ understanding of how, when and why learning builds on their prior knowledge and relates to what they will be learning next.
p.2
Context
Since the additional remote monitoring inspection in February 2021, further changes have been made to the governing body. Currently, there are two acting co-chairs of governors. A new chair and vice-chair will be elected in September. Elections for parent governors were being held at the time of this inspection.
p.2
Context
Governors have taken the decision to close the sixth form. It will relaunch in September 2022 with a changed post-16 curriculum offer.
p.2
Main findings
Pupils’ behaviour has continued to improve, with a significant reduction in reported low-level disruption. This has enabled more focus to be placed on the pupils who need intensive support with their behaviour. Members of the inclusion team work together to provide personalised support. Systems for behaviour management are clear. You have made sure that all staff understand and use them. The ‘character curriculum’ supports work on behaviour across the primary and secondary phases. This year, greater emphasis has been placed on rewarding pupils for good behaviour through the ‘house’ system.
p.2
Main findings
In the primary school, leaders have remained committed to offering pupils wider opportunities, despite the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, primary school leaders have enabled pupils to take part in virtual experiences to make their learning more memorable. The pandemic has led to fewer opportunities for inter-house competitions. A key priority for next year is to embed the house system in the secondary school.
p.2
Main findings
Before the pandemic, subject leaders in both the primary and secondary schools worked on improving their curriculum plans. They thought about the knowledge and skills they wanted pupils to learn, and matched this to the national curriculum.
p.2
Main findings
In the secondary provision, work on the curriculum continues to evolve. Subject leaders have made some small tweaks to their plans since pupils returned to school after the third national lockdown. However, periods of partial closure have meant that you and your team have not been able to complete planned work on the curriculum. Subject leaders have clear intent for the curriculum and have a rationale for teaching topics in the order they do. However, pupils are not so clear about how new learning is connected to previously learned knowledge. Greater clarity would enable them to better prepare for future learning. In the primary school, the sequence of pupils’ learning in history and geography, including when essential knowledge will be revisited, is not as clearly defined as other subjects.
p.2
Main findings
Through ongoing training, the primary school team has improved staff skills and expertise in the teaching of reading. Leaders have invested in resources for pupils which match the phonics programme. Books match pupils’ decoding levels. Younger pupils take books home with them each week. Pupils in need of extra support take part in additional reading sessions which teachers plan to suit pupils’ needs. These sessions are regular and short, so pupils do not miss out on their learning in other subjects. Older pupils speak with enthusiasm about the specific books and authors they enjoy.
p.3
Main findings
In the secondary school, support for pupils with low attainment in reading has also improved. Teachers provide help with phonics and comprehension. This supports pupils to catch up where they have fallen behind.
p.3
External support
The local authority has provided support for your work on improving behaviour and attendance. It has facilitated links with local schools. This has been particularly helpful with remote teaching and with recent work on the marking of Year 11 assessments. This has been a two-way process. Eastbrook teachers have valued the input of colleagues from other schools, and vice versa.
p.3
Evidence
During the inspection, we held meetings with you and other senior leaders, subject leaders, pupils, staff and representatives of those responsible for governance to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.
p.3
Evidence
We visited a selection of lessons, watched the teaching of phonics, reviewed curriculum plans and looked at school improvement documentation. We also looked at the results of parent and staff surveys.
p.3
Evidence
I am copying this letter to the acting co-chairs of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Barking and Dagenham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website. Yours sincerely
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion