Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 8 Jul 2021 · published 28 Sept 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jean Watt

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    8 Jul 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jean Watt

  • Postcode verified

    S25 2NZ

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 77% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseambitiouspositiveclearpreciseimprovedconfidentconsistentlyimproving
Criticismweaknessesrequires improvementdelaysdecline

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings968w+41
  • What needs to improve117w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,083
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 89%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Rebecca Staples Principal Dinnington High School Doe Quarry Lane Dinnington Sheffield South Yorkshire S25 2NZ

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 8 July 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure that curriculum plans clearly identify the most important knowledge that pupils should learn in each subject and in each year group  ensure that the curriculum in Years 7 to 9 is at least as broad and ambitious as the national curriculum.

p.1

Context

Since the last section 5 inspection, there have been significant leadership and staff changes. There is a new chair of the governing body and five new governors. The trust has appointed additional leadership roles with the aim of accelerating the school’s improvement. These include three new pastoral leaders and an assistant special educational needs coordinator (SENCo).

p.2

Main findings

Despite some delays as a result of the pandemic, leaders have taken action to improve the school. More recently, the pace of improvement has gathered momentum. You have raised teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve. Leaders and staff share your vision and sense of urgency to improve the school. The impact of this work has been recognised by pupils, parents and staff. Parents who responded to Ofsted’s Parent View survey were overwhelmingly positive. One commented, typical of many: ‘I wouldn’t want my child to go anywhere else, thank you to all the staff.’

p.2

Main findings

At the previous inspection, leaders were asked to ensure that the key stage 3 curriculum is at least as broad and ambitious as the national curriculum. You and other leaders have reviewed the curriculum at key stage 3. Pupils in Years 7 and 8 now study a broader range of subjects. However, pupils in Year 9 study a range of option choice subjects, and across Years 7 to 9 the subject knowledge that pupils learn still does not match the breadth of the national curriculum. You have planned further work to address this priority.

p.2

Main findings

In some subjects, such as science and modern foreign languages (MFL), curriculum leaders have identified the crucial knowledge that they want pupils to know and remember. However, the curriculum is still underdeveloped in some subjects, such as design and technology. There is still more work to do to ensure that teachers have a clear picture of what pupils must learn over time in these subjects. You have plans in place to provide curriculum leaders with additional support to strengthen curriculum planning.

p.2

Main findings

At the previous inspection, you were asked to ensure that all teachers receive precise information about pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The support for pupils with SEND has improved. The SENCo has implemented clear systems so that pupils with SEND are identified swiftly. New ‘pupil passports’ provide teachers with the precise information that they need so that they know how to support pupils with SEND. Pupils with SEND are receiving better support, which is enabling them to access the curriculum.

p.2

Main findings

Since the previous inspection, you have taken action to improve the school’s reading curriculum. Recently, you have implemented a new reading programme to support the weakest readers. Staff who deliver the school’s reading programme are well trained to teach reading. Pupils who need help with reading receive intensive support. The programme is well delivered. As a result, more pupils are becoming more confident readers.

p.2

Main findings

You have ensured that the school’s new behaviour policy is applied more consistently by all staff. You continue to raise staff’s expectations of all pupils. Pupils know what is expected of them and others. Pupils appreciate the changes to the behaviour policy because they can see it is making a difference.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders have placed a greater focus on improving pupils’ attendance. You have increased staffing to the school’s pastoral team. Leaders have introduced a rigorous system for checking and monitoring pupils’ attendance. Staff engage well with parents when pupils’ attendance starts to decline. Relationships with families have strengthened. Pupils’ attendance is improving.

p.3

Main findings

Governors and trust leaders know the strengths and weaknesses of the school. Governors are now much clearer about their roles and responsibilities. They have received a wide range of training. This is helping them to hold school leaders to account. Minutes from governors’ meetings demonstrate that they ask appropriately challenging questions of school leaders. This is contributing to bringing about rapid and sustained improvements.

p.3

Additional support

The trust has brokered the support of a national leader of education and external consultants to develop middle leadership and improve the school’s curriculum. You have used the support from the trust well to bring about the necessary improvements. For example, curriculum leaders for science and MFL have worked successfully with an external consultant to improve their curriculum plans. The trust SEND leader has supported the school’s SENCo to improve the provision for pupils with SEND.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you, other senior leaders, the chief executive officer of the trust, staff, pupils and representatives of those responsible for governance to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

I reviewed the school development plan, the school self-evaluation document, minutes from governors’ meetings and curriculum plans. I also reviewed the checks that are made on the suitability of adults to work with children. I considered 88 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 33 free-text responses, and 53 responses to the Ofsted staff questionnaire.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the chief executive officer of Learner Achievement and Engagement multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Rotherham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion