Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 13 Jul 2021 · published 27 Sept 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Kim Hall

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    13 Jul 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Kim Hall

  • Postcode verified

    IP24 3LH

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+26Mostly positivemore positive than 63% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovingrigorouscleareffectivewell preparedimprovedsecureenjoy
Criticismweaknessesrequires improvementdisruptionnot securelacktoo manydeclineabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1087w+33
  • What needs to improve473w−20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,558
longer than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%What needs to improve 30%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Katrina Warren Executive Headteacher The Pinetree School Staniforth Road Thetford Norfolk IP24 3LH

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Pinetree School

Following my visit to your school on 13 July 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Pinetree School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Pinetree School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Pinetree School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 implement a rigorous and systematic approach to the teaching of reading so that pupils gain the knowledge and skills they need to become readers  sharply evaluate the impact of leaders’ actions to sustain improvements for pupils against the most important aspects for school improvement.

p.1

Context

Since the previous section 5 inspection in September 2019, leaders have continued to implement their improvement plans. They have reviewed the curriculum and have made significant improvements in the range of subjects taught. Pupils receive all their education at The Pinetree School. No alternative providers are currently being used. Due to the disruptions of COVID-19, to some extent, the impact of leaders’ actions and changes is still to be fully realised.

p.2

Context

The executive headteacher remains in post, who also leads other specialist provision within Unity Education Trust (the Trust). The assistant headteacher leads the school. An English teacher has returned to the school after a planned period of absence. Recruitment to positions is under way as the school still requires additional staff for the next academic year.

p.2

Context

The school has remained fully open over the months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nearly all pupils travel to the school via taxi. Although pupils were eligible to attend during the period of national lockdowns, many did not. Most pupils participated in remote learning using a combination of live lessons and published online education materials.

p.2

Context

All pupils have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) at this alternative provision free school. The primary need is social, emotional and mental health. Pupils are referred to the school from Norfolk and Suffolk local authorities. Most pupils have an education, health and care (EHC) plan.

p.2

Context

The school is part of Unity Education Trust. Since the previous inspection, a Strategic Improvement Board (SIB) has been formed to oversee the school’s improvement. The board is made up of senior staff and trustees.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have a clear focus on improving the standard of education. They have reviewed what pupils are taught and continue to adapt and refine the curriculum. They have worked with experts from within the Trust and a national leader of education (NLE) to redesign the curriculum to give pupils both subject- and topic- based learning. At Key stage 4, pupils choose their examination courses and are increasingly well prepared for the next stage of their education or employment. The disruption over this year due to the pandemic has meant that the full impact of this work on improving pupils’ outcomes is still to be realised.

p.2

Main findings

There is a focus on providing practical opportunities for pupils to apply their knowledge and skills. Many pupils continue to study practical courses at college, such as catering. Leaders provide appropriate careers guidance and support so that pupils can begin courses or work in areas of interest. This academic year, where work experience has not been possible, leaders have still arranged for visiting speakers to hold virtual meetings to enthuse pupils.

p.2

Main findings

In mathematics, the curriculum has been reviewed and improved. There are now more planned opportunities for pupils to develop their knowledge and skills through real-life situations. Leaders and teachers are fully aware that there is still more to be done to plan for pupils to experience the same quality of teaching across other subjects. Leaders now need to sharply focus on the impact of their actions on improving pupils’ learning and achievement.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders have prioritised improving the quality of teaching of reading. There is now a secure process in place to check pupils’ reading ages when they start at The Pinetree School. Leaders have purchased suitable books for pupils to enjoy. There is an increasing focus on sharing vocabulary in lessons, though this is not secure across all subjects.

p.3

Main findings

Recently, leaders have trained some staff to test out their chosen phonics scheme. This trial is proving effective. Most pupils who have been involved in the test programme are making significant gains in learning to read more fluently. Leaders recognise that they still need to implement a rigorous and systematic whole-school approach to the teaching of reading, so that all pupils are taught to read well. More staff require the necessary training to be effective in teaching pupils with SEND to read. Leaders’ plans for school improvement for the next academic year have the teaching of reading as a priority.

p.3

Main findings

Adults provide a nurturing environment for pupils to rebuild their confidence with learning and attending school. There is a clear sense of pastoral care and a desire to help pupils achieve well. Staff and leaders motivate pupils to attend school and ensure that reasons for lack of attendance are explored.

p.3

Main findings

Attendance is carefully monitored. However, there are still too many pupils who have less than 50% attendance overall, often due to modified timetables. Members of the SIB are holding leaders more rigorously to account for improving attendance and reducing modified timetables. The impact of leaders’ actions to improve attendance continues to be a challenge for leaders to overcome.

p.3

Main findings

The management of behaviour is improving. Staff have received additional training in managing pupils’ behaviour. There is a consistent approach in place based on clear rewards and consequences. Fixed-term exclusions are used but there is evidence to show that these are in decline. Leaders monitor significant behaviour incidents and ensure that staff use appropriate strategies to defuse situations. Leaders check the appropriate use of other spaces or rooms where pupils are helped to reflect before returning to class.

p.3

Main findings

There has been a great deal of progress made to strengthen the provision for pupils with EHC plans. The Trust special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) completed an audit of the provision. Plans are well under way to improve the support that pupils with EHC plans receive. Staff are starting to receive additional training, so that they are better skilled to meet the individual needs of pupils. The systems for reviewing the EHC plans are secure and all plans are reviewed in a timely way.

p.3

Main findings

The SIB provides suitable expertise and experience to hold leaders to account for the improvements to the school. They have a clear understanding of the strengths and remaining weaknesses. Plans for continuous improvement are firmly in place. There is a collective approach to raising the quality of education and standards. Minutes of meetings demonstrate that members of the SIB are asking appropriate questions for leaders to produce evidence of the impact of their work.

p.4

Main findings

Leaders have suitable improvement plans in place. They have identified the right actions needed to improve the quality of education for pupils. Leaders now need to have greater focus on checking the impact and sustainability of their improvement work, especially in reading and attendance.

p.4

Additional support

Staff comment on how much they value the professional support they receive from other colleagues across the Trust. There is a more collegiate approach to curriculum and lesson planning in different subjects.

p.4

Additional support

The Trust provides leadership and oversight of many important aspects of the school’s work. Staff at The Pinetree School have received training in behaviour management from leaders of other schools in the Trust. The sharing of practice and resources has hastened the pace of change at The Pinetree School.

p.4

Additional support

Leaders appreciate the guidance provided by the NLE to design and review the curriculum provision. Leaders are using the advice provided to ensure that the curriculum suits the needs of pupils.

p.4

Additional support

The Trust and leaders work closely with the local authorities who refer pupils to the school. There are regular meetings in place to discuss the quality of education provided.

p.4

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with the executive headteacher, the assistant headteacher, other senior leaders, staff, the academy trust chief executive officer and other trustees, and a representative from Norfolk local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.4

Evidence

I visited lessons, considered work in pupils’ books, and observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons. I evaluated a wide range of documentation, including minutes of SIB meetings, safeguarding information, the record of staff recruitment, school improvement plans and curriculum documents. I took account of seven responses to the staff questionnaire.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chief executive officer of the Unity Education Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the directors of children’s services for Norfolk and Suffolk. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion