Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 6 Jul 2021 · published 24 Sept 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Samantha Ingram

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    6 Jul 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Samantha Ingram

  • Postcode verified

    NW10 8UT

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 67% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisewell-sequencedambitiousstrongclearimprovedconfidentconsistent
Criticismrequires improvementdisruptiongaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings727w+33
  • What needs to improve112w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
834
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 87%What needs to improve 13%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Sarah Wawn Headteacher Harlesden Primary School Acton Lane London NW10 8UT

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 6 July 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received a judgement of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure that all books that pupils are given when learning to read are matched closely to the sounds they know, so that they can become fluent readers more quickly.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection, two additional assistant headteachers have been appointed, one from within the school. One has since left. The deputy headteacher is moving on in September to take up a headship. From September, one of the current assistant headteachers will take over as deputy headteacher.

p.2

Context

New governors and a new clerk to the governing body have also been appointed since the last inspection.

p.2

Main findings

Since the last inspection, you and senior leaders have supported curriculum leaders in establishing well-sequenced schemes of work. Some commercial programmes have been bought, as a starting point. These have been adapted to meet the needs of pupils. Opportunities for pupils to repeat and practise important skills and knowledge are clear in curriculum plans for history, science, art, and design and technology.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils’ learning is checked during lessons. Opportunities are provided for pupils to recall key facts, so that these become part of their long-term memory. For example, in science, pupils were learning about sound. Before investigating how sound travels using a string telephone, pupils were asked to recall what they already knew about sound waves.

p.2

Main findings

The implementation of these curriculum plans is not as advanced in other subjects. In particular, assessment in art and in design and technology does not fully take into account what pupils have previously learned. You and subject leaders recognise this, and you already have plans in place to embed assessment in these subjects.

p.2

Main findings

Curriculum development has been strengthened further through collaboration with local secondary schools. This has included partnership work with their subject specialists. As a result, subject leaders have grown in confidence. In particular, it has improved their understanding of the key subject knowledge that pupils need to learn.

p.2

Main findings

You are ambitious for pupils to access all learning through being strong, confident and fluent readers. You stated that pupils engaged well with ‘live’ online lessons during lockdown. You also told me that gaps in phonic knowledge are still apparent due to COVID-19 disruption, but you have adapted phonics provision to help pupils catch up quickly.

p.2

Main findings

The approach to teaching phonics is now consistent across the early years and key stage 1. When pupils are given decodable books that match the sounds they know, they demonstrate fluency in their reading. Teachers also use ‘book bands’ to select pupils’ reading books. However, this is not helping pupils to become better readers because teachers do not make sure that these books are closely aligned to pupils’ phonics knowledge.

p.2

Additional support

You have been proactive in seeking support from the local authority representatives, Brent Teaching School Alliance, Brent Schools Partnership and the Harlesden Cluster. You have also made links with local secondary schools. This has meant that your subject leaders are well trained and supported with planning their new curriculum. You reported that this partnership has been valuable. It has supported you to produce clear subject plans. It has also helped you to write a subject leader handbook to further support the work of subject leaders.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with you, the deputy headteacher, assistant heads and subject leaders. I also met with representatives of those responsible for governance and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

In addition, I visited phonics lessons, as well as hearing pupils read in Reception and Year 1. I scrutinised school improvement plans and leaders’ self-evaluation, and reviewed curriculum-planning documents. I also visited lessons and sampled pupils’ books in science, history, art, and design and technology. I considered the views of parents and staff through Ofsted’s surveys.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Brent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion