Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 8 Jul 2021 · published 24 Sept 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Matthew Barnes

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    8 Jul 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Matthew Barnes

  • Postcode verified

    EX31 1RB

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+61Positivemore positive than 87% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrongwell sequencedknowledgeableimprovedloveskilledpositive
Criticismrequires improvementgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings972w+71
  • What needs to improve118w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,088
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 89%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Graham Hill Pilton Community College Chaddiford Lane Barnstaple Devon EX31 1RB

p.1

College

Following my visit to your school on 8 July 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

College

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

College

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the 2020-21 COVID- 19 (coronavirus) pandemic. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

College

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 sharpen planning so that sequences of lessons better enable pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) to learn the curriculum  strengthen the use of assessment so gaps in pupils’ knowledge are more rigorously identified, particularly for those with SEND.

p.1

Context

At the time of the inspection, a ‘bubble’ of 20 pupils from Year 9 were isolating.

p.2

Context

Trustees have not been able to fill the vacant deputy headteacher position with a suitable candidate. As a result, a leadership restructure has taken place and an English specialist has been seconded to the academy.

p.2

Context

Year 11 pupils have now left the academy.

p.2

Main findings

You and other leaders have tackled the areas for improvement from the previous inspection in a systematic and sustained way. With the support of the trust, you have secured knowledgeable leaders in key positions. You have also improved the impact leaders have on provision. For example, performance management is now much more effective. You have done this while maintaining the motivation and commitment of staff. Staff report that they feel valued and you look to prioritise their well-being.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders’ plans, including those from the trust, link carefully to improve provision further. You have sensibly focused on ensuring there is better coordination between the work of senior and subject leaders. This has helped to ensure that all departments are focused on curriculum design and delivery. Subject leaders are clear about what they want pupils to learn and when.

p.2

Main findings

Your work on curriculum planning has helped raise expectations. For example, you rightly recognised that your key stage 3 curriculum lacked ambition. You utilised the chance to review what pupils learn in key stage 2 by visiting primary schools within the same trust. From these visits, you raised the expectations of your staff when planning the key stage 3 curriculum. At the same time, you rightly restructured the curriculum for pupils in Years 7 to 9. As a result, curriculum planning is better organised and increasingly well sequenced. Pupils recognise the curriculum is more interesting than it was in the past.

p.2

Main findings

You are prioritising pupils’ literacy to improve their outcomes. Reading is now a core element of the curriculum. You have introduced a tutor reading programme, which allows teachers to read texts not normally accessible to some pupils. The programme has helped promote pupils’ love of reading and broaden their vocabulary. Trained teaching assistants deliver phonics sessions to pupils who cannot decode. You rightly recognise this work on literacy is just the beginning. You have sensible plans to develop provision further for pupils whose reading and literacy skills and knowledge are significantly behind where they should be.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Leaders’ actions have had the most impact on teaching. Teachers appreciate the ‘Learning at Pilton’ model you have introduced. This has helped build greater consistency in lessons across departments. For example, pupils recognise the chances they get to build vocabulary and recall prior learning in the subjects they study.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

You have rightly identified the need to sharpen how you assess pupils’ progress. Teachers’ checks on how much of the curriculum pupils remember are underdeveloped.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

You have correctly identified the need to improve provision for pupils with SEND across the curriculum. There are pockets of strong practice. For example, the model used in the communication and interaction resource base is effective. However, some teachers are better at making useful adaptions in lessons than others. More work is also needed to support middle leaders and teachers to identify the essential knowledge they want pupils with SEND to know and remember. This will help teachers plan learning that is accessible for pupils with SEND in all subjects across the curriculum.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Actions to improve behaviour are effective. Staff understand and use the behaviour policy with greater consistency. Pupils say it is now rare to see other pupils escalate through the behaviour policy. Pupils are calm and lessons orderly.

p.3

Additional support

You have made strong use of external support. This is often secured through the collaborations established by the trust. For example, skilled staff have been seconded into key positions to focus on and improve literacy. Governance arrangements include useful systems and processes for leaders to report to the board. The level of challenge provided by executive leaders in the trust has supported you to stay sharply focused on improving the academy. Opportunities to work with and share practice alongside other trust schools have had a positive impact on curriculum planning and expectations.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, other senior leaders, the director of school improvement and chief executive officer from the multi-academy trust, a selection of subject leaders and those responsible for governance to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

Together with the headteacher and head of English, I visited a selection of lessons in English, mathematics and modern foreign languages. During these visits, I spoke to pupils and looked through their work. I met with the lead practitioner from the communication and interaction resource base and the SEND lead from the trust. I scrutinised leaders’ evaluations of the academy’s effectiveness, leaders’ plans for

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

improvement and a letter from Devon County Council in relation to the academy’s work with children in care.

p.4

PROTECT-INSPECTION

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the chief executive officer of the Ventrus multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Devon. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion