Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 30 Jun 2021 · published 22 Sept 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jonathan Keay

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    30 Jun 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jonathan Keay

  • Postcode verified

    WS1 4AH

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+24Mostly positivemore positive than 62% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositivehighly effectiveproudpreciseconfidenteffectivelypreciselyclear
Criticismgapsrequires improvementlimitednot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings947w+17
  • What needs to improve193w+29

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,137
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 17%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Angela Hill Executive Headteacher Palfrey Junior School Dale Street Walsall West Midlands WS1 4AH

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 30 June 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 identify the precise content that staff want pupils to remember and draw upon as they progress through each subject curriculum  liaise with colleagues in feeder schools so that leaders can fully appreciate how content fits together and what learning looks like over time  enhance staff expertise in the teaching of phonics and bolster the tracking and assessment of pupils’ progress through the new programme.

p.2

Context

Leaders have risen to the challenges of the last year. Despite the significant impact of COVID-19 on the school and its community, staff remain positive and united. As a result of highly effective support, pupils’ attendance has quickly returned to average levels for the school.

p.2

Context

COVID-19 has significantly interrupted the teaching of reading. Staff have found that a high proportion of pupils joining the school in Year 3 have gaps in their phonics skills. These gaps are being addressed but there is more work to do.

p.2

Context

The staffing structure remains broadly the same since the school’s last inspection. Palfrey continues to benefit from its membership of the Cadmus federation.

p.2

Main findings

The executive headteacher and heads of school are a receptive and capable team. They are aware of the areas requiring further development and have adjusted plans to highlight these priorities. For example, they know that the teaching and monitoring of the new phonics programme must be strengthened.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have continued their development of the curriculum. Subject leaders have devised progression documents that set out the learning challenges they plan for pupils. These documents, along with more detailed plans that explain how learning links from year to year, are helping staff have greater clarity about what it is they want pupils to know. However, leaders acknowledge that these plans could be even more precise. As a result, staff have recently begun to identify what they call ‘sticky knowledge’. This ‘sticky knowledge’ represents the golden nuggets of curriculum content that leaders want pupils to remember as they encounter new learning.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have also strengthened their relationship with feeder schools. This is helping leaders have greater clarity about curriculum content in early years and key stage 1. This is particularly the case for English and mathematics. However, in some curriculum areas, such as history, geography and music, information about what pupils learn before they join the school is not as clear. This can make it more challenging for the staff to explain precisely how content fits together and what learning looks like over time.

p.2

Main findings

Staff have identified that a significant proportion of pupils who are joining the school have gaps in their early reading skills. To respond to this rise in gaps, leaders have adopted a new phonics programme. The books that pupils read in this programme are matched to the sounds that they are learning. The school has invested in a new bank of resources. It is clear that the programme is having a positive impact. In a short time, pupils are already catching up. However, expertise in the teaching of phonics is currently limited to a small number of staff. The demand for expertise in this important curriculum area is likely to continue. Staff expertise will need to match this demand. Furthermore, while leaders know what sounds pupils are confident in, systems for assessing and tracking pupils’ progress through the programme could be better.

p.3

Main findings

Subject leaders are passionate about their respective areas of responsibility. They have begun liaising with other subject leads in the federation, though some of this work has been hampered by COVID-19.

p.3

Main findings

Governors have considerable expertise in industry and the education sector. They have gone to some lengths to continue meeting during the periods of lockdown. Their commitment to the school, ways of working and attention to staff well-being have also been recognised by the local authority. Governors know the school well and are committed to securing further improvements.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders and governors have worked very effectively to manage the challenges of COVID-19. They are rightly proud of the school’s standing in the local community. Parents who responded to Ofsted’s online questionnaire were very positive about school life. Typical comments from parents during the inspection included: ‘Staff are always willing and ready to help if needed’ and ‘I’m proud to be part of the Palfrey Junior School community.’

p.3

Additional support

The school benefits from the wider support of other specialists from across the Cadmus federation. The federation’s chief operating officer knows the school well and has offered ongoing support. Leaders appreciate the support available and hope that it can grow further in the future.

p.3

Additional support

Leaders have found support from the adviser appointed by the local authority helpful. The school’s adviser has continued to conduct remote visits. Visits have included opportunities for leaders to explore the impact of the improvements they have made to the curriculum.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with the executive headteacher and two heads of school, the pastoral leader and subject leaders to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.4

Evidence

I also met with groups of pupils from Years 4, 5 and 6 to talk about their learning. Pupils brought along their books to share recent topic work. I heard a number of pupils from Year 3 read.

p.4

Evidence

I met with five members of the governing body and the chief operating officer of the Cadmus federation. I held a telephone conversation with the adviser appointed by the local authority. I took account of responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View, including 17 free-text responses. School leaders also provided me with findings from their recent staff questionnaire.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Walsall. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion