Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 29 Jun 2021 · published 21 Sept 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Maureen Su

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    29 Jun 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Maureen Su

  • Postcode verified

    CM1 3ET

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−15Mixedmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedambitiouspositiveconsistentlystrengthsrobusteffectiveconfident
Criticisminconsistenciesweaknessesrequires improvementdisruptionweakerinconsistencynot alwaysstruggle

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings829w−9
  • What needs to improve218w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,047
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 21%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Andrew Parry Headteacher Hylands School Chelmsford Road Writtle Chelmsford Essex CM1 3ET

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Hylands School

Following my visit to your school on 29 June 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Hylands School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Hylands School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the 2020-21 COVID- 19 (coronavirus) pandemic. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Hylands School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Context

Since the previous inspection, three members of the senior leadership team have left. Following this, you restructured the leadership team, and some leaders changed their roles and responsibilities. There is now an ‘extended leadership’ team in place

p.1

PROTECT-INSPECTION

consisting of experienced middle leaders, who were already in post within the school. A new governor has joined the governing body.

p.2

Main findings

Despite the challenges of the pandemic, you have ensured that the focus has been on addressing the areas requiring improvement from the previous section 5 inspection.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders prioritise reading. All pupils, including students in the sixth form, are reading more often. This is ensuring pupils can access all areas of the curriculum. Pupils are encouraged to read a wide range of texts to further extend their understanding of what they read. This is helping pupils learn and remember more complex vocabulary that pupils are beginning to use in their own writing. There is extra support provided for those pupils who struggle with reading. This is helping increase pupils’ confidence to be able to use their reading skills in other curriculum subjects.

p.2

Main findings

You introduced the ‘Hyland Habits’ to raise everyone’s expectations. Pupils and staff report that attitudes towards learning and behaviour in lessons have improved. I observed a positive, calm, and orderly learning environment. Staff understand the reviewed behaviour systems that are now in place. They also appreciate leaders’ support in managing behaviour. Staff are applying the behaviour system more consistently. As a result, there is little disruption to pupils’ learning. Where there is any weaker behaviour this is usually because teachers are not clear enough in their instructions and explanations about what they want pupils to do.

p.2

Main findings

Previously, the curriculum was not challenging enough for pupils. Leaders have reviewed curriculum plans to make sure that there is more challenge for pupils in all subjects. For example, within the history curriculum, teachers expect pupils to understand how to use evidence to make comparisons between different events. Pupils are encouraged to use what they know to explain historical events. This is raising aspirations of pupils. Consequently, an increased number of pupils are now applying for a place at the school’s sixth form.

p.2

Main findings

There were inconsistencies in the quality of education at the time of the previous section 5 inspection. Leaders are closely checking what is happening in lessons. While this work is confirming that inconsistencies have reduced, there are still some teachers who do not routinely check if pupils have remembered the important subject knowledge they have been taught. This results in some pupils struggling to use what they have learned previously to learn new content. Leaders are aware of this and there are plans to provide further training to support staff.

p.2

Main findings

You are ambitious for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Leaders have improved the systems for identifying pupils with SEND and for planning how they will be supported best. Leaders have provided training for

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

staff to help them adapt their planning so pupils with SEND can access all areas of the curriculum. While this is the case, there remains some inconsistency in the quality of support pupils with SEND receive. As a result, when this happens, pupils with SEND do not always achieve as well as they could. The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) is aware of this and there are plans in place to further improve this.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Governors have an accurate view of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. They make sure they know what is happening in the school. Governors provide appropriate support. They also provide robust challenge about the improvements being made in the quality of education.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Your improvement plans are suitable in helping the school to improve. You have accurately identified the actions needed to improve further.

p.3

Additional support

Trust leaders provide effective challenge and support to school leaders. This has helped leaders to improve the curriculum, leadership and check the accuracy of assessment. Teachers value the support from the trust’s teaching and learning coach. Teachers say this is helping them to improve.

p.3

Additional support

Staff value the opportunities to meet and work with other colleagues within the trust. These networks are helping your staff to feel more confident in their work.

p.3

Additional support

The local authority school improvement partner (SIP) knows the school well. Leaders have received support from the SIP. As a result, leaders have refined their systems for checking how well the curriculum is being implemented and this is supporting leaders to improve the quality of education.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with you, other senior leaders, representatives from the trust, pupils, staff, governors, and the local authority SIP to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

I reviewed 45 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and 40 free- texts from parents. I also took account of replies from 33 staff questionnaire responses.

p.3

Evidence

I visited lessons and reviewed a range of documentation, including your evaluation of the school’s provision, improvement plans and minutes of the governing body.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the chief executive officer of the Kemnal Academies Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

director of children's services for Essex. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion