Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
Carmel Christian School
Summary
Elizabeth Farr (lead), Julie Carrington
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
17 Jun 2021
- Inspectors verified
Elizabeth Farr, Julie Carrington
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
BS4 5NL
- Name on report verified
Carmel Christian School
- URN verified
132774
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Children enjoy warm and caring relationships with one another and staff. p.2
- – 34(1)(b) fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently; and p.11
- Children’s behaviour is very good, and they rise to the high expectations of them. p.2
- They are enthusiastic and enjoy the activities on offer. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders must ensure that their recruitment procedures comply with the latest national guidance. p.4
- Leaders must ensure that there is a systematic approach to safeguarding recording and reporting and that the appropriate routes p.4
- 18(3) The checks referred to in sub-paragraphs (2)(c) and (except where sub- paragraph (4) applies) (2)(e) must be completed before a person's appointment. p.10
- Staff need to make better use of assessment in order to determine children’s next steps and use every opportunity to cement their learning. p.4
- In interactions, adults need to recognise more clearly when children need to move on in their learning. p.4
- Leaders need to ensure that any risks to children are precisely identified and, where appropriate, mitigated against. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance23
“Leadership capacity is weak, and responsibilities are not shared widely enough.” p.4Staff development8
“Leaders are not always clear about required staffing positions.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,192
- longer than usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Carmel Christian School 817A Bath Road, Brislington, Bristol BS4 5NL
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
Does the school meet the independent school standards?
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Children enjoy warm and caring relationships with one another and staff. However, leaders have not made sure that their safeguarding practices and procedures keep all children safe. Additional support from appropriate agencies is not sought when, from time to time, families require extra help.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Parents and carers describe the school as a welcoming and friendly place to be. They universally say that staff have created a caring environment for their children to learn and develop. Staff help children feel secure and confident.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The classroom is well resourced, and children have opportunities to explore and learn new things across all areas of learning. Staff take care to ensure that planned activities appeal to children’s interests. Books are central to children’s early experiences and are used well to enthuse children about their learning. Adults get the best from the children in their care.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Children happily and industriously go about their work and play. They respond well to adults’ instructions and requests. Children’s behaviour is very good, and they rise to the high expectations of them. Disagreements are rare and are always short- lived. A cheerful, positive atmosphere pervades.
p.2
better?
The proprietorial board, governors and school leaders are not well informed about the requirements of the independent school standards (ISS). For instance, those responsible have not ensured that there are strong systems for dealing with concerns raised about children’s safety and welfare. Members of the proprietorial body do not make a strong enough contribution to ensuring that safeguarding procedures are in line with what is required of schools. The new early years manager has not had leadership experience nor received sufficient training to help her in her role.
p.2
better?
The proprietor has not ensured that standards relating to the welfare, health and safety are met fully. This means that some of the early years foundation stage welfare and safeguarding requirements are also not met. The school’s safeguarding policy is published on its website but does not contain all the required information, such as guidance for staff on the use of mobile phones and cameras. Additionally, the procedures outlined in the school’s policy are not implemented effectively. Leaders do not complete all the necessary checks on some governors before they start work at the school. Sometimes relevant checks are completed after staff take up their appointment. Leaders are not always clear about required staffing positions. For instance, there is no named deputy lead for the early years, as is required in the early years safeguarding and welfare requirements. New staff are reluctant to take on additional responsibilities, such as acting as a deputy designated safeguarding
p.2
better?
lead. This means that the early years manager carries extensive responsibilities with too little support. 15 to 17 June 2021
p.2
3
Leaders have not thought carefully enough about the school’s risk assessments. These are generic and not adapted to the children’s needs or the physical setting. Risks were identified during the inspection, including a broken door lock in the early years classroom and an area that could be accessed by children that stored empty gas canisters. Leaders had not identified the potential risks of these hazards for themselves.
p.3
3
The curriculum provides for suitable and coherent learning opportunities. Staff make good use of the well-resourced classroom to make learning interesting. Since the appointment of the early years manager, children’s experiences across all areas of learning have considerably strengthened. Staff benefit from the sharing of expertise and respond well to the support that they receive. Everyone’s commitment to training and developing their skills underpins the recent improvements in the early years provision. Staff maintain detailed assessment records and document children’s achievements carefully. Nevertheless, staff are not clear when to encourage children to extend their thinking or when to provide additional support by scaffolding children’s learning more closely.
p.3
3
Children’s acquisition of language is strongly promoted, and the teaching of early reading has an appropriate emphasis. Staff encourage children to enjoy books and stories from the very start. Themed activities linked to familiar stories such as ‘The very hungry caterpillar’ enthuse the youngest of learners. Older children read to adults often. Children achieve well, securely acquiring the language skills that they need in readiness for the challenges that lie ahead in key stage 1.
p.3
3
The youngest children gain a secure understanding of number and the number system. Nursery-aged children are able to count to 10 confidently and identify the numeral that matches the word. They can confidently order numbers. Adults promote children’s independence well. For example, children enjoy the responsibility of making decisions about how to approach tasks, for example when choosing which items to collect when making the number eight. This approach taps into children’s enthusiasm and encourages independent choice making.
p.3
3
Children respond well to adults and welcome interaction, including moments of praise. Most are competent at sharing and taking turns, showing a growing awareness of one another’s needs and feelings. Disagreement between children is rare. They are enthusiastic and enjoy the activities on offer. Children listen well to adults and to one another. Very occasionally, when they lose focus or become distracted, staff are adept at settling children back to task. Children’s personal development is promoted well. Critical thinking sessions support children’s tolerance and build their confidence when speaking in front of their peers.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. 15 to 17 June 2021
p.3
4
Leaders have not made it clear who staff refer on to when they have concerns about a child. Sometimes concerns bypass the school’s designated safeguarding lead and are reported directly to members of the proprietor body. There is no clear process and concerns are not logged or tracked in the necessary detail. Pertinent information is not shared with the appropriate agencies. Inspection evidence shows that the school has not passed on serious concerns to the local authority safeguarding team, as is required.
p.4
(Information for the school and proprietor)
Assessment practice is still developing. In interactions, adults need to recognise more clearly when children need to move on in their learning. Staff need to make better use of assessment in order to determine children’s next steps and use every opportunity to cement their learning. Senior leaders do not make all of the necessary recruitment checks prior to staff and governors taking up appointment. They have not maintained accurate records of their recruitment checks. Leaders must ensure that their recruitment procedures comply with the latest national guidance. Leaders' safeguarding record-keeping is not systematic or organised in a chronological way. On occasions, leaders have not accurately identified possible safeguarding concerns to which pupils may be subject or reported them on to the relevant agencies promptly. Leaders must ensure that there is a systematic approach to safeguarding recording and reporting and that the appropriate routes
p.4
(Information for the school and proprietor)
are followed. Leaders’ risk assessments are not tailored to the setting or to children’s needs. This means that risks are not managed well enough. Leaders need to ensure that any risks to children are precisely identified and, where appropriate, mitigated against. Leadership capacity is weak, and responsibilities are not shared widely enough. For instance, the school has not ensured that there is a named deputy early years manager to take charge in the manager’s absence. Leaders need to develop leadership capacity urgently so that the ISS are met consistently.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 15 to 17 June 2021
p.4
5
If you are the provider and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted . 15 to 17 June 2021
p.5
School details
Unique reference number 132774 DfE registration number 801/6021
p.6
School details
Inspection number 10143828 Type of school Other Independent School
p.6
School details
Proprietor Carmel Ministries International
p.6
School details
Annual fees (day pupils) £4.00 per hour or £300 per month
p.6
School details
Email address jcollins@carmelchristianschool.org
p.6
School details
Date of previous inspection 13–15 November 2018 15 to 17 June 2021
p.6
Information about this school
Carmel Christian School is a non-selective independent Christian day school in Bristol, owned by Carmel Ministries International. The school opened in 2000. Since the last standard inspection, the school has undergone significant change. The headteacher and deputy headteacher retired in December 2020. The school’s current headteacher joined in December 2020 and is referred to as the early years manager. At the same time, the school changed its registration status with the Department for Education. The planned admission number reduced from 75 to 26, and the age range of pupils changed from three to 18 years to three to five years. The school is situated on one site and does not use alternative provision. Children in Nursery and Reception are taught in one early years class which caters for children from three years old. Children receive 15 to 30 free funded hours. Currently there are no children who have an education, health and care plan.
p.7
Information about this school
The school was last inspected in November 2018. The school did not meet all of the independent school standards and the overall effectiveness was judged to be inadequate. In October 2019, a progress monitoring inspection took place and reported that the school still did not meet all of the independent school standards. This standard inspection also incorporated a progress monitoring inspection. The school’s stated ethos is to: ‘Promote a Christian ethos and worldview. By example and direct teaching, we [the school] follow and promote the teachings of Jesus, which has respect, love, and honour of all people, regardless of age, gender, race, ability or orientation, at its heart. Accordingly, our early years community is a place where children are encouraged to value and appreciate themselves and others as unique individuals’. Carmel Ministries International proprietorial body consists of the chair and three
p.7
Information about this school
members who act as ‘overseers’. There is an overseer for equipping, for assets and for pastoral care. In addition, there is a small governing body.
p.7
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008. The purpose of the inspection is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school's suitability for continued registration as an independent school.
p.7
Information about this inspection
The school has failed to meet the independent school standards. These are the requirements of the schedule to the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014. 15 to 17 June 2021
p.7
8
Inspectors met with the headteacher and other staff who were present during the inspection. A meeting was held with the chair of the board, from Carmel Ministries International, who acts as the proprietorial body. A meeting was also held with the chair of the governing body. Inspectors checked the school’s compliance with the independent school standards. We did deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, physical development and understanding of the world. Inspectors met with the headteacher who has responsibility for the curriculum, visited lessons, looked at children’s work, talked to children about their work and discussed the school’s approach to curriculum delivery with staff. The school’s safeguarding arrangements were reviewed. Inspectors met with the school’s designated safeguarding lead, and scrutinised the school’s single central register and safeguarding records. The inspection team also considered how well
p.8
8
adults in the school act on emerging concerns about pupils’ welfare. Inspectors observed children during the school day, including at playtimes. A range of documentation was scrutinised. We took account of the nine responses to the Ofsted Parent View survey, and six additional free-text responses. We considered the views of one member of staff who responded to Ofsted’s staff survey.
p.8
The school’s progress in meeting previously failed standards
During this inspection we checked whether the school now meets the independent school standards that it was judged to have failed at its previous inspection.
p.8
The school now meets the previously failed standards
Part 1 - Paragraphs 2(1), 2(1)(a), 2(1)(b), 2(1)(b)(i), 2(2), 2(2)(f), 3, 3(a), 3(c), 3(d), 3(f) and 3(g) The school has reduced its age range so that it now caters solely for early years children. The curriculum is appropriate, and staff plan and assess suitable activities across all areas of learning. Tasks are appropriate for the age of pupils. These standards are now met. Statutory requirements of the early years foundation stage: Safeguarding and welfare requirements, paragraphs 3.21 and 3.22. The new early years leader is fostering a culture of teamwork. Staff are benefiting from a wide range of appropriate training and coaching to improve their skills and expertise. These standards are now met.
p.8
The school now meets the previously failed standards
The school continues to not meet the previously failed standards. Part 3 – Paragraph 16, 16(a) and (b) 15 to 17 June 2021
p.8
9
Leaders have still not ensured that adequate risk assessments are in place. Risk assessments are not personalised to the classroom or the children. Part 8 – Paragraph 34(1), 34(1)(a)–(c) The proprietor has not ensured that there is sufficient capacity to make the much- needed improvements to the quality of leadership. New leaders do not have the experience that is required. Leaders are not familiar with the independent school standards. The standard in this part is not met. Statutory requirements of the early years foundation stage: Safeguarding and welfare requirements, paragraph 3.64 remains unmet. Leaders cannot demonstrate how they are managing risk. Risks assessments do not demonstrate how risks in the classroom will be removed or managed. The outdoor area has not been assessed for risk.
p.9
Inspection team
Elizabeth Farr, lead inspector Her Majesty's Inspector
p.9
Inspection team
Julie Carrington Her Majesty's Inspector 15 to 17 June 2021
p.9
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils
7 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that-
p.10
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils
– 7(a) arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of pupils at the school; and
p.10
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils
– 7(b) such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State.
p.10
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils
16 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that-
p.10
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils
– 16(a) the welfare of pupils at the school is safeguarded and promoted by the drawing up and effective implementation of a written risk assessment policy; and
p.10
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils
– 16(b) appropriate action is taken to reduce risks that are identified.
p.10
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
18(2) The standard in this paragraph is met if-
p.10
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
– 18(2)(b) no such person carries out work, or intends to carry out work, at the school in contravention of a prohibition order, an interim prohibition order, or any direction made under section 128 of the 2008 Act or section 142 of the 2002 Act, or any disqualification, prohibition or restriction which takes effect as if contained in either such direction;
p.10
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
18(3) The checks referred to in sub-paragraphs (2)(c) and (except where sub- paragraph (4) applies) (2)(e) must be completed before a person's appointment.
p.10
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
21(3) The information referred to in this sub-paragraph is-
p.10
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
– 21(3)(a)(iii) a check was made to establish whether S is subject to any direction made under section 128 of the 2008 Act or section 142 of the 2002 Act or any disqualification, prohibition or restriction which takes effect as if contained in such a direction;
p.10
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
– 21(3)(b) in relation to each member of staff ("S"), whether a check was made to establish whether S is subject to a prohibition order or an interim prohibition order, including the date on which such check was completed. 15 to 17 June 2021
p.10
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
34(1) The standard about the quality of leadership and management is met if the proprietor ensures that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school-
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
– 34(1)(a) demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently;
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
– 34(1)(b) fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently; and
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
– 34(1)(c) actively promote the well-being of pupils.
p.11
Early Years Foundation Stage
The proprietor has not ensured that the school meets the safeguarding and welfare requirements of the statutory framework of the early years foundation stage. This is because the same safeguarding failings that are present in the school are also present in the early years. The relevant paragraphs from the statutory framework are 3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 3.23 and 3.64. 15 to 17 June 2021
p.11
12
to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.12
12
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.12
12
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.12
12
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.12
12
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.12
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion