Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Wiltshire College and University Centre

Inspected 11 Jun 2021 · published 16 Sept 2021 · URN 132779

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Kathryn Rudd

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    11 Jun 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Kathryn Rudd

  • Postcode verified

    SN15 3QD

  • Name on report verified

    Wiltshire College and University Centre

  • URN verified

    132779

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
24
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
8 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 3%About the inspection 97%

Full report text

Wiltshire College and University Centre Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Kathryn Rudd, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: General further education college

p.1

Address:

Cocklebury Road Chippenham Wiltshire SN15 3QD Monitoring visit: Wiltshire College and University Centre, 10–11 June 2021

p.1

Context and focus of visit

This was an announced safeguarding monitoring visit, following concerns that had been reported to Ofsted and that remain under investigation by another agency. The purpose of the visit was to assess whether the safeguarding arrangements at the college are effective. Inspectors’ judgements were informed by actions taken by the provider’s leaders and managers in response to the concerns that had been reported to Ofsted, alongside any other evidence available at the time of the visit.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Wiltshire College and University Centre is a general further education college with campuses in Trowbridge, Chippenham, Salisbury and Lackham. Just over 40% of learners are under 18 years of age. Almost half of all learners study a level 2 programme. Approximately 70% of learners study part time at the college.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The college has 1,877 apprentices studying level 2 to level 5 courses. The college has 11 subcontractors, who all offer courses in the Wiltshire area. One subcontractor provides full-time courses to learners under 18 years of age.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Wiltshire College and University Centre had a short Ofsted inspection in June 2018 and the provider was judged to have remained good. Safeguarding was judged to be effective.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) has been taken into account in the findings and progress judgements below.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders comply with relevant safeguarding requirements for learners and apprentices studying on college premises.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders have responded constructively to the safeguarding concerns raised by local agencies in relation to Wiltshire College and University Centre learners studying with one of their subcontractors. Leaders and managers have worked with this subcontractor to improve its safeguarding policies, procedures and practice. This has resulted in improvements to the subcontractor’s understanding of, and approach to, learner safeguarding and welfare issues. For example, the subcontractor has appointed a full-time safeguarding lead, established new recording systems to clearly Monitoring visit: Wiltshire College and University Centre, 10–11 June 2021 monitor safeguarding concerns and provided additional support for subcontracted learners, such as counselling.

p.2

Reasonable progress

However, college leaders have not ensured that their own policies and procedures clearly articulate their safeguarding responsibilities for their learners who study with a subcontractor.

p.3

Insufficient progress

College leaders and managers have appropriate arrangements in place for safeguarding apprentices studying on college premises. However, leaders have not ensured that safeguarding arrangements for Wiltshire College and University Centre learners who study with the subcontractor are effective, particularly for those learners under 18 years of age and living away from home. Consequently, leaders are not able to assure themselves that these learners are safe.

p.3

Insufficient progress

College leaders and managers do not audit the subcontractors’ safeguarding arrangements to the same standard as the safeguarding arrangements for their own college provision. For example, college managers are not expected to provide senior leaders with information about the subcontractor with sufficient depth, frequency or formality. As a result, senior leaders do not have accurate information about safeguarding issues at the subcontractor or the actions taken by the subcontractor managers. They are therefore unable to identify whether lessons can be learned when safeguarding issues at the subcontractor arise.

p.3

Insufficient progress

College managers do not systematically gather information from their learners who study with the subcontractor about whether they feel safe and are safe. College managers are overly reliant on information produced by the subcontractor to assure themselves that learners are safe, and that learners’ concerns have been resolved appropriately. During the COVID-19 lockdowns, college managers had very little contact with their learners studying at the subcontractor, even with those who were self-isolating and living away from home.

p.3

Insufficient progress

College managers have not clearly defined the subcontractors’ responsibilities to report lower-level safeguarding issues and welfare concerns. The thresholds for reporting these concerns are unclear.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders have not ensured that the subcontractor is meeting its contractual safeguarding obligations. For example, the college’s partnership agreement with the subcontractor specifies that the subcontractor must not provide or recommend accommodation for young learners living away from home. However, inspectors were told by learners that accommodation had been recommended by the subcontractor during their induction and parents believed that the accommodation was endorsed by the subcontractor. Monitoring visit: Wiltshire College and University Centre, 10–11 June 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education

p.3

Insufficient progress

and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Insufficient progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.4

Insufficient progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.4

Insufficient progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.4

Insufficient progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion