Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Yesodey Hatorah Senior Girls School

Inspected — · published 14 Sept 2021 · URN 133599

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Nasim Butt (lead), Brian Oppenheim

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Brian Oppenheim, Nasim Butt

  • Postcode verified

    N16 6UB

  • Name on report verified

    Yesodey Hatorah Senior Girls’ School

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 81% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongimprovedeffectivelyambitiousimprovingwell behavedpositiveconsistent
Criticismnot yetgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,231
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 47
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
0
typical 8
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 92%About the inspection 8%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Clare Neuberger Acting Headteacher Yesodey Hatorah Senior Girls’ School Egerton Road Stamford Hill London N16 6UB

p.1

School

Following my visit with Lucy Bruce and Nasim Butt, Her Majesty’s Inspectors, to your school on 22 and 23 June 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the school’s previous monitoring inspection.

p.1

School

The inspection was the fourth monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection that took place in March 2018. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The monitoring inspection report is attached.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

The school may appoint newly qualified teachers before the next

monitoring inspection. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Hackney. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.1

Context

Yesodey Hatorah Senior Girls’ School is a smaller-than-average 11 to 16 orthodox Jewish maintained voluntary-aided girls’ secondary school. The school’s intake is exclusively from the Charedi community in Stamford Hill, Hackney.

p.3

Context

There have been no changes to staff since the last monitoring inspection in April 2021.

p.3

Context

In this monitoring inspection, we looked more deeply at English, mathematics, science, art and design, and personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

The school has raised its game considerably since the last full inspection in March 2018. Leaders continue to improve the school’s curriculum. Subject plans have been consolidated and developed further. Leaders have made strong progress with improving the planning and teaching of the curriculum. However, there is more to be done to ensure that the curriculum is giving pupils a thoroughly broad experience. In addition, leaders and governors have not yet ensured that all the protected characteristics, as defined by the Equality Act 2010, are covered fully in the curriculum.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Subject leaders have continued to develop the programmes for biology, careers and PSHE to ensure that the curriculum is both broad and ambitious. Schemes of work in all subjects are well structured to help pupils remember what they have learned and apply their knowledge to more advanced work. In mathematics, for example, the programme is structured to ensure that pupils know the fundamental concepts before tackling more difficult areas such as quadratic equations. Teachers have adjusted the order in which topics are taught so that pupils can take logical, organised steps through their learning.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

The programmes for other subjects, such as English, science and art, are also planned to ensure that pupils progress with their learning. Topics are taught in a coherent sequence and attention is given to ensuring that pupils repeat the essential knowledge so that they recall information quickly. For example, the art curriculum gives pupils the opportunity to practise their drawing skills repeatedly. In English, repetition of key knowledge is used to reinforce reading and writing. This enables pupils to become fluent readers and means they are able to write with greater accuracy and for different audiences.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

In science, much has been done to develop the curriculum so that pupils have a broad experience of all the sciences. For example, biology has been introduced in Year 8 and is to be extended through Years 9, 10 and 11. At present, human reproduction is not included, but leaders intend to introduce this topic to pupils in a way that reflects the values of orthodox Judaism.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Careers education has been greatly improved for all pupils from Year 7 upwards. All pupils in Year 10 receive an individual interview and feedback. In addition, there is a programme of visits to places of work. Although visits have been necessarily curtailed due to the pandemic, pupils have been to a local business as part of an enterprise project. Many are now following this up by running their own small businesses with help from the school.

p.4

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Subject leaders have done much to provide relevant professional development for their teachers. In mathematics, for example, weekly meetings are used to discuss the next week’s programme and how to approach teaching. In addition, subject leaders check teachers’ planning of the curriculum regularly to ensure consistency. Across the school, a relatively high number of staff do not have a teaching qualification. However, senior leaders encourage staff to gain Qualified Teacher Learning and Skills status through local providers. This is helping to extend teachers’ expertise effectively.

p.4

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Despite advances to the way the curriculum is planned and taught, there remain some sticking points. Pupils choose their GCSE subjects in Year 8. For subjects such as art, history, geography and music this means that the key stage 3 course runs for two and not three years. For the most part, subject leaders make every effort to ensure that pupils cover the full scope of the national curriculum for Years 7 to 9. Nevertheless, the reduced time for key stage 3, and taking some GCSEs early in Year 10, restricts some pupils’ opportunities to deepen their learning.

p.4

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

The school’s procedures for assessing pupils’ learning are now consistent. Pupils understand the feedback they get from teachers. In some subjects, quite complex marking procedures are used to calculate an overall grade. Teachers use this information to identify some gaps in pupils’ knowledge. However, the assessments do not check whether pupils are remembering the subject content more broadly. As a result, potential gaps in pupils’ learning are not identified routinely and addressed.

p.4

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Leaders have introduced PSHE since the last full inspection in March 2018. Pupils now learn about different religious beliefs, alongside developing an in-depth knowledge and understanding of Judaism. The course covers British values appropriately and pupils know about the democratic process. However, the PSHE curriculum does not yet include teaching which promotes understanding of all the protected characteristics, as defined by the Equalities Act 2010.

p.4

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

The governing body has improved its work in holding leaders to account and is working to ensure that all legal requirements are met. The principal now reports to the headteacher. Governors are firm in their belief that they have done everything they can to meet the requirements to prepare pupils for life in modern Britain. It is clear that pupils are taught to respect others, regardless of differences. Pupils are well behaved, welcoming to visitors and have positive attitudes to school. However, pupils are not taught about gender identity, or the legal rights given to LGBT people. This means that governors are failing to ensure that the school promotes pupils’ awareness and understanding of all the protected characteristics effectively.

p.4

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

During the inspection, inspectors found some library books that were redacted. Leaders and governors explained that there is a process of replacing these books and provided a list of those that had been removed. Leaders also said that the school does not have the resources to replace all of them at the same time. Nevertheless, by the second day of the inspection, the redacted books had been removed from the library.

p.5

Additional support

Support from the local authority (LA) is strong. The LA has provided expert help in a number of areas, including improving the design and delivery of the curriculum, developing a coherent PSHE programme and governance. Leaders are especially appreciative of the LA’s support and the work of its consultants.

p.5

Evidence

Inspectors spoke to the acting headteacher, the principal, senior and middle leaders, pupils, staff and governors to discuss the work of the school. Inspectors also spoke to a representative of the local authority. The inspection team visited a sample of lessons and checked documentation. There were no responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, or to staff questionnaires.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion