Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 6 Jul 2021 · published 14 Sept 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lee Selby

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    6 Jul 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Lee Selby

  • Postcode verified

    PO10 7NN

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+7Mostly positivemore positive than 53% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositivewell sequencedambitioussuccessfullywell supportedclearrespectfulconsistently
Criticismpoornot yetmissedrequires improvementdecline

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings840w+17
  • What needs to improve301w−40

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,139
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 74%What needs to improve 26%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Josie Payne Headteacher Glenwood School Washington Road Emsworth Hampshire PO10 7NN

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Glenwood School

Following my visit to your school on 6 July 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Glenwood School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Glenwood School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Glenwood School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 reinforce and refine plans to improve the teaching of reading, including phonics, to those pupils who are not yet fluent readers, and ensure that the weakest readers receive regular expert teaching to help them to catch up and access the curriculum  ensure that assessment systems closely match the planned curriculum and clearly identify what pupils are learning and remembering.

p.2

Context

Since the last Section 5 inspection in December 2019, there have been changes to governance, including the appointment of two new co-chairs of the governing body.

p.2

Context

During the periods when the school was only open to some children due to COVID- 19 restrictions, approximately 60% of pupils were educated remotely at home.

p.2

Context

There were no Year 11 pupils in school on the date of this visit. Their last day of school was 11 June 2021.

p.2

Main findings

You have shown real determination, ably supported by your deputy headteacher, to set about making the improvements needed. You have successfully developed a team ethic and consistency of approach. This has been demonstrated most notably in the improvements in behaviour noted by pupils, parents and staff. More recently, you have ensured that there is greater consistency in planning the curriculum and how it is taught and assessed in different subjects. Staff feel incredibly well supported by you and other leaders and are positive about the work taking place to improve the school.

p.2

Main findings

The significant improvements in behaviour are clear to all. The school is calm, organised, friendly and respectful. Every pupil is known and treated as a unique individual. There is a clear decline in the number of incidents of poor behaviour being recorded. Your team’s focus is now deliberately on dealing with any poor behaviour consistently. You have led a definite shift to focus on learning and any missed learning time being made up if pupils make poor behaviour choices.

p.2

Main findings

While your own workload has not slowed, especially while continuing to make improvements and managing a school during a pandemic, you have started to share the load. Middle leaders are now taking a more proactive role. For example, they are checking on the curriculum development in different subjects and leading and monitoring the work to improve the behaviour of individual pupils. You have produced a curriculum that is interesting and well sequenced in most subjects. There are developing strengths in art, personal, social and health education, and science. Your pupils are beginning to know and remember more in these subjects. You and your team have been thinking about the qualifications pupils will work towards or their next steps in education, employment or training. All of the Year 11 pupils who have recently left have suitable college places to go on to in September. You know that you need to check more rigorously that teachers are

p.2

Main findings

always as ambitious as they can be when selecting the most appropriate qualifications for pupils.

p.3

Main findings

Your pupils certainly enjoy the range of subjects available. All national curriculum subjects, apart from a foreign language, are covered at key stage 3. A range of appropriate subject choices are available to pupils in key stage 4 that help them prepare for the next stage of their education.

p.3

Main findings

Together we saw pupils enjoying their lessons in a range of subjects. However, sometimes subject-specific vocabulary is being avoided or missed by teachers who are oversimplifying the work and therefore the expectations on pupils.

p.3

Main findings

We agreed that while assessment is more consistent across subjects, it does not match the planned curriculum exactly. You and your team need to agree why assessments are being carried out and who for. You realise that you need your assessment system to show that pupils are knowing and remembering more of the planned curriculum.

p.3

Main findings

The skills and experience of the governing body have been strengthened. Governors are now looking forward to moving their focus on to monitoring how successful you and your team have been in implementing plans. Governors will do this through visits to the school, in line with their planned monitoring programme.

p.3

Main findings

You understand that reading needs to be prioritised further. Positive work has been completed to raise the profile of reading in the school, with every pupil reading for 20 minutes after lunch each day. However, more work is needed to give your staff the skills to teach the weakest readers well. We discussed how more training is needed, and the importance of an agreed phonics programme being implemented for those pupils who are not yet fluent readers. Teachers need to use assessment better to plan suitable reading activities. You realise that reading books need to match the phonic ability of the weakest readers but also be age-appropriate.

p.3

Additional support

The local authority has provided extensive support and monitored the progress of the school closely. There has been significant input from advisers in a range of subjects and areas of the school. This is helping to make improvements in key areas of the curriculum such as English. However, the school requires more specific support around the teaching of phonics to older pupils who are learning to read.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with you, the deputy headteacher and other staff. I also met with two representatives of those responsible for governance and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.4

Evidence

I also visited a range of lessons and reading sessions with you. I talked to pupils informally in class and at break time. I looked at examples of curriculum planning and assessment and scrutinised the school improvement plan and other documentation.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the co-chairs of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Hampshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion