Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Sept 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Marc White (lead), Stefanie Lipinski-Barltrop

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Marc White, Stefanie Lipinski-Barltrop

  • Postcode verified

    LU1 1UP

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−21Mixedmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrongconsistentlywell preparedpositivepreciseimprovingsecure
Criticismconcernsnot effectiveseriousrequires improvementweakernot alwaysconcernnot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings907w−26
  • What needs to improve187w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,091
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
7
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 17%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Rohila Nisar Acting Headteacher Foxdell Junior School Dallow Road Luton Bedfordshire LU1 1UP

p.1

School

Following my visit with Marc White, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), to your school on 15 June 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. We discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in our evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school. The school should take further action to ensure that:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 leaders provide a consistently good quality of education for all pupils across all year groups  curriculum leaders refine subject plans to allow all pupils to develop their knowledge in the right order so that they are well prepared for the next stage of their education  leaders embed a phonics programme which supports pupils who struggle with their reading.

p.2

Context

This was the first monitoring inspection since the school’s section 5 inspection in December 2019. The executive headteacher was absent from school from November 2020, from which time you have been in role as acting headteacher. Since the previous inspection, a new assistant headteacher and a special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) have been appointed. The executive headteacher resigned in June 2021. No teachers have left the school.

p.2

Context

In March 2021, the school received an additional remote monitoring inspection led by two HMIs. Inspectors judged that leaders and those responsible for governance were taking effective action to provide education in the current circumstances. However, safeguarding was not effective.

p.2

Main findings

Following the previous inspection, school improvement slowed due to the impact of COVID-19. You have continued to make improvements since your appointment in November 2020. Expectations around the school have increased. There is a sense of momentum. Leaders have a strong vision for improvement. They know what is working well and have identified the issues that need to be addressed. Improvement plans are detailed and precise. Leaders review the impact of their actions on a regular basis and amend their strategies accordingly. Staff are united in improving the school.

p.2

Main findings

At the previous inspection, teachers did not have a consistently strong knowledge of some subjects and how to teach them. Leaders have developed curriculum overviews for all subjects in the national curriculum. The plans set out the knowledge and the order in which it is taught in each year group. Due to the restrictions of the pandemic, leaders have not been able to check the impact of the new plans on pupils’ progress.

p.2

Main findings

Reading is a priority at the school. Staff have the structures and frameworks they need to plan reading well. The school’s arrangements for the teaching of reading continue to improve. Staff continue to develop their knowledge of phonics and how to teach it well. Leaders plan to introduce a new phonics programme to better support the weaker readers.

p.2

Main findings

The previous inspection identified that leaders were not aware that some classroom provision for pupils with SEND did not always match pupils’ ability levels. The new SENCo has a secure understanding of the needs of individual pupils. Staff now have training to ensure that pupils with SEND can access the curriculum. Staff use what they know about individual pupils’ needs to provide appropriate activities to help them learn. Children who speak English as an additional language are supported well, which gives them more confidence.

p.3

Main findings

Behaviour around the school is positive. Pupils listen respectfully to each other. Pupils say that they like going to school, that bullying is rare, and if it does happen, teachers help them.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders continue to monitor attendance closely with the support of the education welfare officer. They have worked together to develop a detailed understanding of the individual needs of pupils and their families where attendance is an issue. Leaders provide effective individual support to families to help improve their children’s attendance where needed.

p.3

Main findings

The additional monitoring inspection in March 2021 raised serious concerns about safeguarding. Leaders have overhauled their approach to safeguarding. All staff have received safeguarding training and know the signs of abuse and neglect. They know how to report a concern about a pupil. Leaders follow up on concerns about pupils’ welfare in a systematic and organised manner. They work with external support, including the police, to help strengthen their information gathering. This helps when seeking support from the local authority.

p.3

Main findings

The chair of governors works closely with you, providing appropriate support and challenge. Governors now ask more challenging questions to check that improvements are being made.

p.3

Additional support

Leaders are working with Denbigh Primary School to help improve systems and processes at Foxdell Junior School. Since April 2021, the deputy headteacher from the primary school has provided additional capacity four days a week to support teaching and learning, and behaviour.

p.3

Additional support

The school has made effective use of the extensive support provided by the local authority. Notably, the support to improve safeguarding has led to a substantial improvement. Since March 2021, the local authority has provided safeguarding training for all staff, an audit of the single central register and an audit of the school’s systems and processes for safeguarding. The English consultant is working with leaders to develop the curriculum. The school improvement adviser provides a healthy balance of support and challenge.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, we held meetings with you, other senior leaders, pupils, staff, and representatives of those responsible for governance. I held a telephone conversation with a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.4

Evidence

We visited lessons, reviewed a range of documentation and the school’s improvement plans. We reviewed 19 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey, and the 18 written responses. We considered the 15 responses to Ofsted’s staff survey.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Luton. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion