Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 15 Jun 2021 · published 13 Sept 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tim Jenner

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    15 Jun 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tim Jenner

  • Postcode verified

    S8 7JG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+40Positivemore positive than 72% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedeffectiveambitiousknowledgeableclearly
Criticismdelayedrequires improvementinconsistency

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings717w+47
  • What needs to improve101w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
817
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 88%What needs to improve 12%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Lindsay Jones Principal Lowedges Junior Academy Lowedges Road Sheffield South Yorkshire S8 7JG

p.1

Academy

Following my visit to your school on 15 June 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Academy

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

Academy

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the 2020-21 COVID- 19 (coronavirus) pandemic. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Academy

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure that all staff have suitable expertise in the teaching of phonics and early reading.

p.1

Context

The Covid-19 (coronavirus) pandemic has affected leaders’ work to improve the school. For example, Covid-19 delayed planned improvements in how leaders monitor the quality of teaching.

p.2

Context

Since the previous inspection, the school has appointed a new phonics and early reading leader. A senior leader has taken on the role of acting special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) and a new SENCo has been appointed to start in September 2021.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have taken effective action to improve the teaching of phonics and early reading. Leaders and teachers prioritise reading. Pupils who need extra practise to catch up get the support they need. The early reading leader is an expert and models effective teaching of phonics to staff. This work is developing greater knowledge and expertise among staff. However, some inconsistency in the teaching of phonics and early reading remains. Some staff do not quickly identify and address pupils’ misconceptions in phonics.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils take home books to practise their reading, which are matched to their phonics knowledge. Leaders have based their approach to early reading on the Department for Education’s (DfE) ‘Letters and Sounds’ strategy. Currently, leaders are reviewing their approach to phonics and early reading. This is to ensure that it provides the right teaching and support for pupils, staff and parents and carers.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have improved the identification of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). As a result, adults identify pupils’ needs more quickly. Leaders have effective plans in place to support pupils with SEND. Leaders involve parents and carers in the planning process. Leaders have improved how they communicate information about pupils’ needs to staff.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have taken action to improve the attendance of pupils. They work closely with families. An educational welfare officer from the multi-academy trust (MAT) is now based at the school. The attendance of pupils with SEND has improved. However, this remains a focus of leaders’ actions to improve the school.

p.2

Main findings

The quality of curriculum planning has improved, supported by subject experts from across the MAT. Leaders and teachers are ambitious for all pupils. Curriculum plans clearly identify what pupils need to know and be able to do at each stage in their learning. Training from the MAT has also improved the expertise of subject leaders in evaluating the impact of teaching in their subjects. This work was delayed by Covid-19 but has resumed recently and is being quickly embedded.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Governors are knowledgeable about leaders’ actions to improve the school. They hold leaders to account. Governors evaluate the impact of leaders’ actions in meetings and through focused visits to the school.

p.3

Additional support

Support from the MAT has been effective in addressing areas for improvement. Colleagues from across the MAT have worked together to improve the quality of curriculum plans. Training has improved the way subject leaders monitor the quality of education. SEND and inclusion staff have received regular support and training from the MAT. The school has also received external support from a local English hub. This has helped leaders to evaluate the quality of teaching of phonics and early reading.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher and other senior leaders, representatives of the MAT, including the chief executive officer and those responsible for governance. I also met with pupils and staff, including the SENCo.

p.3

Evidence

I listened to pupils read and visited lessons and intervention sessions. I reviewed documentation and considered the results of staff and parent surveys.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Aston Community Education Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Sheffield. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion