Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
15 Jun 2021
- Inspectorssingle source
Tim Jenner
- Postcode verified
S8 7JG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The Covid-19 (coronavirus) pandemic has affected leaders’ work to improve the school. p.2
- For example, Covid-19 delayed planned improvements in how leaders monitor the quality of teaching. p.2
- Since the previous inspection, the school has appointed a new phonics and early reading leader. p.2
- A senior leader has taken on the role of acting special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) and a new SENCo has been appointed to start in September 2021. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance21
“Leaders and teachers are ambitious for all pupils.” p.2Teaching & assessment11
“However, some inconsistency in the teaching of phonics and early reading remains.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 817
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Lindsay Jones Principal Lowedges Junior Academy Lowedges Road Sheffield South Yorkshire S8 7JG
p.1
Academy
Following my visit to your school on 15 June 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Academy
The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.
p.1
Academy
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the 2020-21 COVID- 19 (coronavirus) pandemic. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in my evaluation.
p.1
Academy
Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
in order for the school to become a good school.
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
The school should take further action to:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
ensure that all staff have suitable expertise in the teaching of phonics and early reading.
p.1
Context
The Covid-19 (coronavirus) pandemic has affected leaders’ work to improve the school. For example, Covid-19 delayed planned improvements in how leaders monitor the quality of teaching.
p.2
Context
Since the previous inspection, the school has appointed a new phonics and early reading leader. A senior leader has taken on the role of acting special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) and a new SENCo has been appointed to start in September 2021.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders have taken effective action to improve the teaching of phonics and early reading. Leaders and teachers prioritise reading. Pupils who need extra practise to catch up get the support they need. The early reading leader is an expert and models effective teaching of phonics to staff. This work is developing greater knowledge and expertise among staff. However, some inconsistency in the teaching of phonics and early reading remains. Some staff do not quickly identify and address pupils’ misconceptions in phonics.
p.2
Main findings
Pupils take home books to practise their reading, which are matched to their phonics knowledge. Leaders have based their approach to early reading on the Department for Education’s (DfE) ‘Letters and Sounds’ strategy. Currently, leaders are reviewing their approach to phonics and early reading. This is to ensure that it provides the right teaching and support for pupils, staff and parents and carers.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders have improved the identification of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). As a result, adults identify pupils’ needs more quickly. Leaders have effective plans in place to support pupils with SEND. Leaders involve parents and carers in the planning process. Leaders have improved how they communicate information about pupils’ needs to staff.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders have taken action to improve the attendance of pupils. They work closely with families. An educational welfare officer from the multi-academy trust (MAT) is now based at the school. The attendance of pupils with SEND has improved. However, this remains a focus of leaders’ actions to improve the school.
p.2
Main findings
The quality of curriculum planning has improved, supported by subject experts from across the MAT. Leaders and teachers are ambitious for all pupils. Curriculum plans clearly identify what pupils need to know and be able to do at each stage in their learning. Training from the MAT has also improved the expertise of subject leaders in evaluating the impact of teaching in their subjects. This work was delayed by Covid-19 but has resumed recently and is being quickly embedded.
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
Governors are knowledgeable about leaders’ actions to improve the school. They hold leaders to account. Governors evaluate the impact of leaders’ actions in meetings and through focused visits to the school.
p.3
Additional support
Support from the MAT has been effective in addressing areas for improvement. Colleagues from across the MAT have worked together to improve the quality of curriculum plans. Training has improved the way subject leaders monitor the quality of education. SEND and inclusion staff have received regular support and training from the MAT. The school has also received external support from a local English hub. This has helped leaders to evaluate the quality of teaching of phonics and early reading.
p.3
Evidence
During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher and other senior leaders, representatives of the MAT, including the chief executive officer and those responsible for governance. I also met with pupils and staff, including the SENCo.
p.3
Evidence
I listened to pupils read and visited lessons and intervention sessions. I reviewed documentation and considered the results of staff and parent surveys.
p.3
Evidence
I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Aston Community Education Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Sheffield. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion