Schools & FE · School monitoring visit
Ormiston Denes Academy
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Damian Loneragan
- Postcode verified
NR32 4AH
- Name on report verified
Ormiston Denes Academy
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders recognised that some pupils with SEND are not always getting the help they need to access the school’s curriculum. p.4
- The trust is supporting the school to access the expertise it needs to develop the curriculum and leaders’ skills further. p.4
- Their plans identify accurately what needs to be done. p.3
- Leaders need to ensure these pupils access an effective curriculum more suited to their needs. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment9
“Teachers’ adaptations are not always useful in helping pupils with SEND.” p.4Personal development5
“The PSHE curriculum is planned well and focusses on pupils’ needs.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 1,088
- shorter than usual (typical 1570)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Jim Nixon Interim Headteacher Ormiston Denes Academy Yarmouth Road Lowestoft Suffolk NR32 4AH
p.1
Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Ormiston Denes Academy
Following my visit with Al Mistrano, Maureen Su and Fiona Webb, Her Majesty’s Inspectors (HMI) to your school on 22 and 23 June 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the school's previous monitoring inspection.
p.1
Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Ormiston Denes Academy
The inspection was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses following the section 5 inspection that took place in June 2019. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The monitoring inspection report is attached.
p.1
Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Ormiston Denes Academy
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. We discussed the impact of the pandemic with the you and have taken that into account in our evaluation.
p.1
Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Ormiston Denes Academy
Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Leaders and managers are taking effective action towards the removal of
I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the chief executive officer or equivalent of the Ormiston Academies Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Suffolk. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.1
Context
This was the second monitoring inspection since the school’s section 5 inspection in June 2019. The school’s first monitoring inspection occurred in December 2019 before the COVID-19 pandemic. During the spring term 2021, an additional monitoring visit took place. Inspectors found that the school was taking effective action to provide education in the circumstances.
p.3
Context
You were appointed as the interim headteacher from September 2019. Additional new leaders joined the school, including a vice principal and a temporary assistant principal. Later, with support from the trust, the leadership team was restructured. New roles were created, including a vice principal and several heads of year.
p.3
Context
A new headteacher has been appointed and will join the school from September 2021. Members of the trust are managing the transition in leadership with the support of an executive principal.
p.3
designation
Since the previous monitoring inspection, leaders have continued their drive to make the school better for pupils. Their plans identify accurately what needs to be done. Leaders are determined and know where there is more work to do in order to remove the school’s serious weakness designation.
p.3
designation
As a result of leaders’ actions, many curriculum plans have improved. Where plans are clear, they support teachers to introduce new knowledge step-by-step. The plans are new, and teachers are now learning how best to use them. As a result, not all learning activities are helpful in supporting pupils learn new things or remember what they have been taught. Pupils told us that they wished they could spend more time on really understanding an idea. While there are ‘green shoots’ of improvement, inconsistencies in the curriculum still remain. Leaders have identified clearly where this is happening. With the support of the trust, leaders are now providing teachers with relevant training to help improve the curriculum further.
p.3
designation
Leaders have prioritised the improvement of the personal, social and health education (PSHE) curriculum. Pupils now have more PSHE lessons. There is a stronger focus on providing useful careers’ guidance. The PSHE curriculum is planned well and focusses on pupils’ needs. Teachers support pupils to make well- considered decisions about their next steps. Pupils told inspectors that they really valued PSHE lessons and it made them aware of issues that affect them.
p.3
PROTECT-INSPECTION
The previous inspection in spring 2021 highlighted concerns around the provision for pupils who find reading difficult. As a result of leaders’ actions, weaker readers now access improved support, including phonics lessons, to help them get better at reading. While some pupils are making effective progress others still need further support to catch up quickly. Leaders plans show that improving literacy and oracy remain a priority for the school.
p.4
PROTECT-INSPECTION
Leaders are improving the support for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Leaders have a clear understanding of the emotional and behaviour needs of pupils with SEND. The special educational needs coordinator has now rightly focused on improving the support pupils with SEND are getting in the classroom. Leaders recognised that some pupils with SEND are not always getting the help they need to access the school’s curriculum. Teachers’ adaptations are not always useful in helping pupils with SEND. Work to improve this area is at an early stage and not embedded consistently across all subjects.
p.4
PROTECT-INSPECTION
A small number of pupils attend alternative provision. While leaders keep a close eye on the safety and welfare of these pupils, they do not check pupils’ learning of the curriculum well enough. Leaders do not always have the right strategies to integrate pupils back into the main school curriculum. Governors and the trust have rightly challenged leaders about this issue. Leaders need to ensure these pupils access an effective curriculum more suited to their needs.
p.4
PROTECT-INSPECTION
Leader’s actions continue to improve pupils’ behaviour and welfare. Leaders and staff have a better understanding of the emotional support pupils need. Provision such as ‘Thrive’ are giving leaders a range of tools to keep pupils in school. The number of exclusions and negative behaviour incidents continue to reduce. Pupils, staff and parents told inspectors that behaviour in the school is improving. Inspectors saw courteous behaviour both in and out of the classroom. Against the background of the pandemic, leaders continue their work to improve attendance. Governors have a clear understanding of patterns in attendance and have oversight of the numbers and reasons why pupils are leaving the school.
p.4
PROTECT-INSPECTION
Staff recognise that their workload can be high. They say that leaders help them prioritise their work effectively. Staff told inspectors that they felt they were part of a community that is beginning to make a real difference to pupils’ lives.
p.4
PROTECT-INSPECTION
Leaders, governors and the trust work closely together to improve the school. The governing body has a strong understanding of the journey the school is on and hold leaders to account for their actions.
p.4
Additional support
The trust provides leaders with appropriate challenge. The trust is supporting the school to access the expertise it needs to develop the curriculum and leaders’ skills further. Most recently, for example a national leader of SEND has begun to support
p.4
PROTECT-INSPECTION
the development of the school’s special educational needs coordinator. Additionally, the trust has provided the school with an executive principal to strengthen the school’s leadership.
p.5
Evidence
Inspectors observed the school's work, scrutinised documents and met with the interim headteacher, other senior leaders, pupils, staff, representatives of those responsible for governance and representatives of the Ormiston Academies Trust.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion