Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 30 Jun 2021 · published 13 Sept 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andrea Bedeau

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    30 Jun 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrea Bedeau

  • Postcode verified

    TW3 1QZ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−18Mixedmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseimprovingimprovedconsistentlyeffectively
Criticismweaknessrequires improvementfall behindstruggle

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings690w−18
  • What needs to improve73w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
761
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 48
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 90%What needs to improve 10%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Laura Khalil Headteacher Hounslow Town Primary School School Road Hounslow TW3 1QZ

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 30 June 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school received a judgement of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Primary School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 make sure pupils build their knowledge of different subjects from the early years into Year 1 and beyond  make sure links between new knowledge and prior learning are made explicit in lessons.

p.1

Context

The work on the new building was completed after the previous inspection. The school moved to the new premises in September 2018.

p.2

Main findings

You and your leadership team have focused on improving the areas of weakness identified in the previous inspection. Leaders researched strategies aimed at improving reading. They selected and adapted an international programme to develop pupils’ reading. Leaders check the progress pupils make. Pupils who fall behind receive additional support from a trained adult, to help them catch up.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders prioritise phonics as soon as children enter the school in the early years foundation stage (EYFS). Leaders frequently check the sounds pupils know and remember. Teachers use this information to target their support. Pupils who are new to the school, or need to improve their ability to decode, also receive extra phonics teaching. Leaders provide books matched to the sounds pupils are learning. Pupils read these in school and at home.

p.2

Main findings

Subject leaders have improved their knowledge and expertise. As a result, they create appropriate subject plans. These plans link to learning in the early years. However, subject leaders should make sure the plans deliberately build on knowledge from the EYFS. Leaders give appropriate advice and support to class teachers. This ensures that teachers implement subject plans consistently. In some subjects, the most important knowledge pupils need to remember is not made explicit. As a result, sometimes pupils struggle to link new knowledge to what they have learned before.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders make sure all pupils can access the curriculum. This includes pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities. Pupils working in the additional resourced provision learn the same topics as their peers. The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) works with subject leaders and teachers to make sure lessons meet pupils’ needs. Specialist practitioners and therapists work with pupils. These experts share their knowledge with staff. This means that staff are increasingly able to support pupils effectively.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders provide a range of support for families who may need help. Some pupils receive packs containing reading books and resources to use at home. Parents value the help and support provided.

p.2

Main findings

Governors work with leaders to find out what needs to improve. Governors carry out subject checks with external experts. As a result, governors are better at challenging and holding leaders to account.

p.2

Additional support

Leaders have worked with different organisations to improve the school. Subject leaders work with subject leaders from other schools. This helps them improve their subject knowledge. They use this knowledge to improve teaching. Leaders benefited from visits and advice from local authority advisers. This helped leaders to focus their improvement work. Governors take part in training from the local authority. This means they better understand their role in supporting and challenging leaders.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with the headteacher, other senior leaders, five subject leaders, the SENCo, staff, pupils, representatives of those responsible for governance and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

I visited a lesson, looked at documentation, examined 69 parent survey responses and 72 staff survey responses.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner, and the director of children’s services for Hounslow. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion