Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

Little Gruffalos (Hemsworth)

Inspected 16 Aug 2021 · published 10 Sept 2021 · URN EY487726

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Melanie Arnold

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Percy, Emma Claire

  • Group reference verified

    RP515492

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Aug 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Melanie Arnold

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    WF9 4AZ

  • Name on report verified

    Little Gruffalos (Hemsworth)

  • URN verified

    EY487726

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

6% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−18Mixedmore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoysafeeffectivelyeffectivesettledaccuratelypromptly
Criticismnot alwaysweaknessesconcernsharmnot confidentnot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings506w−42
  • Safeguarding124w−11
  • What needs to improve307w+27

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
901
about usual (typical 857)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 53
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 35%Safeguarding 9%What needs to improve 22%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

Inspection of Little Gruffalos (Hemsworth) The Salvation Army Community Centre, Bush Street, Hemsworth, Pontefract, West Yorkshire WF9 4AZ

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

The provision requires improvement

Children remain safe in the care of the staff team. Their behaviour is good overall. Any minor behavioural issues are appropriately managed by staff. Children enjoy taking part in a range of play experiences. Staff engage with children, chatting to them and providing a dialogue as they play. This helps to support children's communication skills. However, planned activities are not always pitched to meet children's individual abilities. For example, children aged from two to nine years are grouped together for an activity. Staff only identify what they want children aged three and four years to learn. The storytelling session does not engage and support all children's learning. This results in some younger children wandering off during the activity. Even though the activity is planned for pre-school children, their interest is also not sustained.

p.2

The provision requires improvement

Since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic, parents no longer enter the setting when dropping off or collecting their children. Staff now welcome children into the setting by greeting them at the main entrance. This enables staff to liaise with parents and share relevant information. The provider confirms that children have adapted well to this new approach. She has also found that most children have settled more effectively into the setting. Parents explain how the setting's online app is also used by staff to share relevant information with them.

p.2

need to do better?

n Staff monitor children's progress. They share observations of children's learning with parents. However, staff do not always plan activities based on what children already know and can do. This means that activities are not adapted to meet the age and stage of development of each child. Furthermore, activities do not provide children with a good level of challenge. For example, children enjoy a planned activity where they make a jelly fish or an octopus. However, staff have not identified what they would like children to learn from this activity. The activity is also overly directed by staff. The resources needed for children to make their models are already prepared. While children enjoy gluing their models, there is little to challenge them. n Following children's return to the setting since the pandemic, the provider recognised that their physical abilities were not as developed. She introduced

p.2

need to do better?

daily physical play sessions to support children to improve their core stability, balance and fine manipulative skills. The provider understands how these sessions will also help to strengthen children's muscles and eventually lead them to develop good pencil control. However, staff do not have this good knowledge. They only explain how these sessions support children's physical skills and balance. n Parents confirm that staff have supported their children's communication and

p.2

need to do better?

16 August 2021 language skills. The provider works with outside agencies to support children who are struggling with their speech and language. She considers children's needs when identifying how to spend additional funding. This helps to prevent children from falling further behind in their development. n Staff are not as confident as the provider in identifying the learning intent of activities. When they do identify what skills and knowledge they want children to learn, they do not always implement these. For example, staff plan for children to make an ice-cream sundae. They explain that they want children to learn how to safely control a knife when cutting up fruit. They also want children to learn about healthy eating. Staff support children to hold the knife and they take turns chopping up a banana. However, the strawberries are already cut up for the children. This prevents them from continuing to practise their cutting skills. Staff

p.2

need to do better?

supervise the children to maintain their safety while they use the knife. However, there are no discussions about how to safely use the knife or about healthy eating. Children enjoy the experience, but their ongoing learning and development are not promoted effectively. n The provider monitors staff practice through supervisions. She accurately evaluates and identifies weaknesses in staff's practice. When the provider identifies weaknesses, she promptly intervenes and models good teaching practice. However, staff are not supported to improve their skills during these interventions. This is because staff have developed an over-reliance on the provider. Staff tend to allow her to take over and lead the activity. They do not use it as an opportunity to strengthen their practice.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff have a suitable understanding of child protection. They can recognise a range of indicators of abuse. The provider and staff know how to make a referral if they have any concerns about a child or an adult. Procedures for the safe collection of children are followed, to keep children safe from harm. When children were not attending the setting during the pandemic, the provider maintained regular contact with all families. Parents explained how this contact supported not only their children's emotional well-being, but their well-being too.

p.3

Due date

16 August 2021 support staff to use information gained from assessments, so that they understand how to sufficiently differentiate planned activities which build on individual children's prior knowledge and skills. 28/09/2021

p.3

should:

n help staff to gain a better understanding of what they want children to learn (the intent), so that all experiences provided become more purposeful, and support children's ongoing learning and development n improve supervision of staff so that they understand that interventions and modelling of good practice, demonstrated by the provider, are there to coach and support their ongoing development.

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number EY487726 Local authority Wakefield Inspection number 10204221 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises

p.5

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Full day care

p.5

inspection

Total number of places 38 Number of children on roll 27 Name of registered person Percy, Emma Claire

p.5

reference number

Telephone number 01977612919 Date of previous inspection 9 August 2016

p.5

Information about this early years setting

Little Gruffalos (Hemsworth) registered in 2015. The nursery employs seven members of childcare staff. Of these, five hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 3 or above, including one with early years professional status. The nursery opens from Monday to Friday all year round, except for bank holidays and two weeks at Christmas. Sessions are from 7am until 4pm. The nursery provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.

p.5

Inspection activities

n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the setting. n The provider and the inspector completed a learning walk where the provider explained the skills and knowledge she wants children to learn. n The inspector spoke with several parents during the inspection and took account of their views. n Discussions were held with the provider, staff and children during the inspection. n The inspector and the provider carried out a joint observation, evaluating the quality of education during a planned activity.

p.6

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Inspection activities

16 August 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion