Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
19 Aug 2021
- URN verified
EY283756
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 382
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 38, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 7 July 2021, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. We found that the provider had failed to notify Ofsted that an allegation had been made against a member of staff. On 23 July 2021, 28 July 2021 and 18 August 2021, we carried out a regulatory telephone call. We found that the provider had failed to notify Ofsted of a significant event, which is a requirement of their registration.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We also found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements and had taken action to put this right. The provider has provided mentoring and training to strengthen staffs understanding of the settings behaviour management procedure when dealing with a child. In addition, they have provided guidance to staff regarding the settings code of conduct while working with children and have demonstrated a responsible attitude as they have recognised this was required. During the regulatory telephone call, we also found that the provider was not meeting an additional requirement and we have issued actions for the provider to take. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
• strengthen the management teams' knowledge and understanding as to what constitutes an allegation and to ensure steps are followed to notify the agencies with statutory responsibilities without delay, including social care services and, in emergencies the police.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 31 August 2021, we received the providers response. The management team has completed safeguarding training and has strengthened their knowledge and understanding of safeguarding practices, roles, and responsibilities. We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare action raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion