Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 15 Jun 2021 · published 7 Sept 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    15 Jun 2021

  • Postcode verified

    LE9 7PA

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+7Mostly positivemore positive than 53% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconsistentlyeffectivestrengthimprovedimprovingeffectivelyprecisely
Criticismrequires improvementinconsistenciesinconsistencystruggledelayednot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings810w−8
  • What needs to improve250w+54

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,057
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 76%What needs to improve 24%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Debbie Brown Acting headteacher Newlands Community Primary School Belle Vue Road Earl Shilton Leicester LE9 7PA

p.1

Community Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 15 June 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Community Primary School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

Community Primary School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the 2020–21 COVID- 19 (coronavirus) pandemic. I discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Community Primary School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

in order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure that subject leaders complete the work they have started by developing curriculum plans that set out precisely the knowledge that all pupils, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), must learn and the order in which they should learn it  provide staff in all year groups with training in the school’s phonics programme, check that the agreed approach to teaching phonics is consistently delivered and ensure that those pupils who struggle to read receive effective teaching to help them to catch up  ensure that subject leaders have the necessary knowledge and skills to make sure that the school’s curriculum is taught consistently well.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection, there have been significant changes to the school. The headteacher left the school in April 2021. The deputy headteacher and the assistant headteacher are currently leading the school with the local authority’s support. A new chair of the governing body and a new governor have been appointed. Four teachers have been appointed and will start in the Autumn term 2021. Leaders have dealt with significant staff absences.

p.2

Context

COVID-19 has significantly affected attendance. On the day of the inspection, one ‘bubble’ of year 3 pupils was closed, and pupils were sent home to isolate.

p.2

Context

More recently, leaders have accelerated their actions to improve the school. The pandemic has not affected the urgency with which leaders have acted to improve the provision.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have taken significant steps to improve the teaching pupils receive. However, there are still inconsistencies, which mean that some pupils do not learn as well as they could. Leaders have provided training to help teachers improve their teaching.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders are reviewing the school’s curriculum to make sure that it meets the needs of all pupils. Leaders are checking that all subjects include the knowledge they want pupils to know. Some subject curriculums, such as science, are more developed. Senior leaders know that subject leaders need further training to develop their expertise and leadership skills to develop the curriculum and check on its delivery. Leaders have plans in place to provide this training. Some training has been delayed due to COVID-19. Some subject leaders have been unable to make checks on their subject areas because of the safety restrictions the pandemic has created. This has slowed development of the curriculum in some subjects.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders continue to prioritise reading. They have changed the phonics programme to make sure that pupils can learn all the knowledge they need to sound out and read words. Teachers regularly check the sounds that pupils have remembered. Pupils with SEND receive extra help with their reading and phonics. They have ensured that reading books in the early years, and Years 1 and 2 are well matched to pupils’ needs.

p.2

Main findings

The teaching of phonics in the early years is a strength. However, in other year groups there is inconsistency in the teaching of early reading. Some staff do not have the knowledge they need to be able to teach phonics well. Some pupils who need extra help with their reading do not learn to read quickly enough. Leaders have not ensured that pupils who are the furthest behind in learning to read receive the most effective teaching to help them to catch up with their reading.

p.3

Main findings

The school’s SEND coordinator is helping teachers understand how they can best support pupils with SEND. Leaders are beginning to check that pupils with SEND are getting the right support in lessons. However, they have not yet considered how to adapt curriculum plans to support SEND pupils in different subjects.

p.3

Main findings

Governance has improved significantly since the last inspection. Governors have ensured that they have had appropriate training to help them to challenge leaders. They understand the school’s priorities. Governors make sure that leaders are now improving the school rapidly. Governors understand the need to make careful checks as the reviewed curriculum is implemented, particularly in mathematics. They know that subject leaders will need support to fulfil their roles effectively. They also understand that recruiting a new headteacher is a priority.

p.3

Main findings

Plans for improvement show the actions for the school to become good. Leaders have recently adapted these plans to include support for disadvantaged pupils. Governors are using these plans to check the leaders’ work.

p.3

Additional support

More recently, leaders have used support from the local authority to bring about swift improvements. This support has included improving teachers’ quality of questioning and teaching and providing support for subject leaders, particularly for English and mathematics.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you, other senior and subject leaders, pupils, staff, governors and representatives of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.3

Evidence

I visited mathematics and phonics lessons. I observed pupils reading to a member of staff. I reviewed 62 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 58 free-text responses and 18 staff survey responses. I reviewed the school’s improvement plans, curriculum plans, minutes of governors’ meetings and reports from the local authority. I reviewed the single central record. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Leicestershire County Council. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion