Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
2 Sept 2021
- URN verified
2515535
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 372
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage (EYFS). If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 28 June 2021, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. The inspection report sets out the actions the provider was required to take to meet the requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 10 August 2021, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting some of the requirements of the EYFS. The provider also notified us. The notification means that the provider met their legal responsibility as set out in the EYFS.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 11 August 2021, we conducted an unannounced visit and found that the provider had made progress toward the actions set at inspection. We found the staff have improved knowledge of local safeguarding procedures and how to identify if a child is at risk of radicalisation.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We also found that some requirements were not being met. We have served a welfare requirements notice. This is a legal notice that requires the provider to take the actions below within the timescales set out. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n train all staff so they have a secure knowledge of wider safeguarding issues, with particular reference to female genital mutilation
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure that all areas young children play in are thoroughly risk assessed.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 1 September 2021 we conducted a visit and found that the provider had taken suitable steps to ensure young children's safety. We also found that staff have a strong knowledge of wider safeguarding matters including, how to report them. The next step will be a full inspection. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion